You are here

Home » Content

EDİNSEL MANDIBULAR DEFEKTLER VE PROTETİK TEDAVİLERİ

PROSTHETIC REHABILITATION OF ACQUIRED MANDIBULAR DEFECTS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The defects those accomplished by the resection of a malign or a benign neoplasm in mandible are called acquired mandibular defects. The management of malignant tumors associated with the tongue, floor of the mouth, mandible and adjacent structures represent a difficult challenge for the surgeon, radiation oncologist and prosthodontist relative to both control of the primary disease and rehabilitation following treatment. Follow up of the patient starting from the preoperative phase with interdisciplinary cooperation obtains more successful prosthetic applications.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Maııdibulada oluşan habis ya da selim bir neoplazmanm cerrahi olarak çıkarılması (rezeksiyonu) sonucu oluşan defektlere edinsel mandibular defektler adı verilmektedir. Dil, ağız tabanı, mandibula ve çevre dokuların habis tümörlerinin kontrol altına alınarak tedavisi ve tedavi sonrası hastanın rehabilitasyonu cerrah, radyoterapisi ve prostodontistlerin sorumluluğunda ekip çalışması yapılmasını gerektirir. Hastanın operasyon öncesi dönemden başlayarak disiplinler arası İşbirliği içinde takip edilmesi daha başarılı protetik uygulamalar yapılmasını sağlar.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-edinsel-mandibular-defektler-protetik-tedavileri.pdf
  • 1-2
37
42
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Beumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT.
Maxillofacial Rehabilitation (Prosthodontic
and Surgical Considerations) In: Ishiyaku
EuroAmerica, Inc. StLouis Tokyo; 1996:
113-16
2. Silverman S Jr, Gorsky M . Epiedomiologic
and demogrphic update in oral cancer:
California and national data 1973 to 1985. I
Amer Dent Assoc 1990; 120:495-6
3. Walton L, Silverman S Ir, Costa CR.
Epidemiology and demographic update in
oral cancer: California 1973-1990. Calif
Dent Assoc J 1991; 19:17-19
4. Mahbobi E. The epidemiology of oral
cavity, pharyngeal and esophageal cancer
outside of North America and Western
Europe. Cancer 1977; 40:1879-80
5. Albert S, Child M . Familial cancer in the
general population. Cancer 1977; 30:1674 -
75
6. Berg JW, Schottenfeld D, Ritter F. Incidence
of multiple primary cancers.III. Cancers of
the respiratory and upper digestive system as
multiple primary cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst
1970; 44:263-265
7. Day GL, Blot WJ. Second primary tumors İn
patients with oral cancer. Cancer 1992;
70:14-15
8. Spitz MR, Fueger IT, Goepfert H, ET al.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the upper
aerodigestive tract. A case comparison
analysis. Cancer 1988; 61:203-206
9. Fu K K , Lichter A, Galante M. Carcinoma of
the floor of the mouth : An analysts of
treatment results and the sites and cause of
failures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1976;
1:829-32
10. Benowitz NL. Drug Therapy.
Pharmacological aspects of cigarette
smoking and nicotine addiction. New Engl J
Medl988; 319:1318-19
11. Ernster VL. Trends in smoking, cancer risk,
and cigarette promotion. Current priorities
for reducing tobacco exposure. Cancer 1988;
62:1702-6
12. Silverman S Jr, Gorsky M , Greenspan D.
Tobacco usage in patients with head and
neck carcinomas: A follow-up study on habit
changes and second primary
oral/oropharyngeal cancers. J Amer Dent
Assoc 1983; 106:33-34
13. Squer CA. The nature of smokeless tobacco
and patterns of us.CA 1988; 38:226-27
14. Creath CJ, Shelton WO, Wright JT, et al.
The prevalance of smokeless tobacco use
among adolescent male athletes. J Amer
Dent Assoc 1988; 116:43-45
15. Winn DM. Smokeless tobacco and cancer:
The epidemiologic evidence. CA 1988;
38:236-7
16. Keller EE, Desjardins RP, Eckert SE,
Tolman DE. Composite bone grafts and
titanium implants in mandibular
discontinuity reconstruction. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3:261-2
17. Keller EE. Mandibular discontinuity
reconstruction with composite grafts: Free
autogenous iliac bone, titanium mesh trays,
and titanium endosseous implants. Oral
Maxillofac Surg Clin Nor Amer 1991;
3:877-78
18. Habal MB, Rasmussen RA. Osseointegrated
Implants in Cranial Bone Grafts for
Mandibular Reconstruction. J Craiofac Surg
1993; 4:51
19. Roumans E, Markowitz B, Lorant J, et al.
Reconstructed mandible defects: Fibula free
flaps and osseointegrated
implants.(Submitted to Plast Reconst Surg
İN 1995.)
20. Keskin H, Özdemir T. Çene Yüz Protezleri.
İstanbul Üniversitesi Basım evi. 1995.
42
21. Aramany M, Myers E. Dental occlusion and arch relationship in segmental resection of the mandible. In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face and neck : proceedings of the second international symposium. Sisson GA, Tandy ME. Eds. New York. 1977; Grune-Stratton, Inc.
22. Robinson J, Rubright W. Use of a guide plane for maintaining the residual fragment in a partial or hemimandibulectomy. J Prosthet Dent 1964; 14:992
23. Cantor R, Curtis TA. Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. Part ILClinical procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 25:546
Gülümser EVLİOĞLU, Ayşen AZAK
24. Cantor R, Curtis TA. Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. Part III:Clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 25:670
25. Beumer J, Lewis S. The Branemark Implant System: Clinical and Laboratory Procedures. St Louis . Mo. 1989; Ishiyaku EuroAmerica. Inc.
26. Beresin VE,Scheisser FJ. The neutral zone in complete dentures,St. Louis , 1978; The C.V. Mosby Co.
27. Swoope C. Prosthetic management of resected edentulous mandibles. J Prosthet Dent 1969; 21:197

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com