You are here

LAZER DİAGNOSTİK SİSTEMİ İLE FARKLI DOLGU MADDELERİNİN FLORESANS YAYILIM DERECELERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

EVALUATION OF FLUORESCENCE DEGREE OF DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS USING LASER DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
İn this study, the evaluation of fluoresence of various restorative materials and different colors of the two restorative materials by using Laser Fluorescence Diagnostic System was aimed. Cavities were prepared on the occlusal surfaces of the uneruptcd third human molars. Glass ionomer cements, compomer, and resin composite materials were placed and laser fluoresence was measured by Kavo DİAGNOdent laser device. Data were statistically analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test. Darkest shade of Valux resin composite (A3.5) and Dyract compomer (C2. C3, A4) were found to have less fluoresence than the lighter shades. These differences are similar to obtained from sound tooth structures and decay. It will be better if fluoresence laser diagnostic device is not used alone for examination of restored teeth by esthetic restorative materials.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmada, iki restoratif materyalin farklı renklerinin ve farklı yapıdaki çeşitli restoratif materyallerin, floresans lazer diagnostik sistemi ile floresans derecelerinin ölçülerek karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gömük yirmi yaş dişlerinde açılan kavitelere, farklı tipte geleneksel cam iyonomer simanı, canı sermet simanı, kompomer ve kompozit reçine materyalleri yerleştirilmiş ve Kavo DİAGNOdent Lazer cihazı ile floresans yaydım dereceleri ölçülmüştür ve veriler, Kıııskal-VVallis Testi ile istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Valux kompozit reçinenin kullanılan en koyu renginin (A 3.5) ve Dyract kompomer materyalinin koyu renklerinin (C 2, C 3. A 4), açık renklere göre daha az Floresans yaydım derecesine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen farklı flurcsans dereceleri, sağlıklı diş dokuları ile çürük diş dokuları arasındaki farka benzer bir durum ortaya koymaktadır. Bu nedenle çürük teşhisi sırasında, lazer floresans tanı cihazının, özellikle restorasyon taşıyan dişlerde tek başına kullanımı yanıltıcı olabilir.
39
44

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Eggertsson H, Analoui M. van der Veen M. Gonzales- Cabezas C, Eckert G. Stookey GK. Detection of early interproximal caries in vitro using laser fluoresence, enhanced laser fluoresence and direct visual examination. Caries Res 1999: 33: 227-33.
2. Hall AF. De Schepper E, Ando M, Stookey GK. In vitro studies of laser flurosence for detection and quantification of mineral loss from dental caries. Adv Dent Res 1997: 11: 507-14.
3. Ferreira Zandona AG, Analoui M, Schemehorn BR, Eckert GJ, Stookey GK. Laser fluoresence detection of demineralization in artificial occlusal fissures. Caries Res 1998: 32: 31-40.
4. Ferreira Zandona AG, Analoui M, Beiswanger BB, Isaacs RL, Kafrawy AH, Stookey GK. An in vitro comparison between laser fluoresence
and visual examination detection of demineralization in occlusal pits and fissures. Caries Res 1998: 32: 210-8.
5. al-Khateeb S, ten Cate JM, Angmar-Mansson B, Oliveby A. Quantification of formation and rcmineralization of artificial enamel lesions new portable fluoresence device. Adv Dent Res 1997: 11: 502-6.
6. Lussi A, Imwinkeireid S. Pitts N, Longbottom C, Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser flurosence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999: 33: 261-6.
7. Ross G. Caries diagnosis with the DİAGNOdent Laser. A user's product evaluation. Ont Dent 1999: 76: 214
8. Reich E, Al Marrawi F, Longbottom C. Lussi A. Fluoresence of different dental materias in Laser Diagnostic System. J Dent Res 1998: 77: 821 (Special Issue# 1527).
9. van der Veen MH, de Josselin De Jong E. Application of quantitative light-induced fluoresence for assessing early caries lesions. Monogr Oral Sci 2000: 17: 144-62.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com