You are here

Home » Content

IMPLANT CERRAHİSİN İ KISITLAYAN DURUMLAR VE CERRAHİ KOMPLİKASYONLAR

SURGICAL LIMITATIONS AND COMPLICATIONS IN IMPLANT DENTISTRY

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Adequate bone quality and quantity is a definite prerequisites for implant surgery. Bone grafts and/or guided tissue regeneration procedures are used in order to overcome difficulties which may possibly arise from insufficient bony structure. Not regarding anatomical structures, lack of surgical technique or improper pre-surgical planing may result in complications in dental implant applications.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Dental implant uygulanacak bölgenin belirli miktarda ve kalitede kemik dokusu barındırması gerekir. Kemik dokusunun yetersiz olduğu durumlarda kemik greftleri ve/veya yönlendirilmiş doku rejenerasyonu prosedürleri uygulanmaktadır. İmplant uygulaması sırasında anatomik yapılara özen göstermemek, dikkatsiz veya eksik cerrahi uygulamalar ve planlama hataları komplikasyonlara yol açabilmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-implant-cerrahisin-i-kisitlayan-durumlar-cerrahi-komplikasyonlar.pdf
  • 1-2
1
6
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Van den Bergh JPA, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Tuinzing DB. Preimplant surgery of the bony tissues. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1998: 80: 175-83.
2. Sina Uckan, Firdevs Veziroglu, Emre Dayangac. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation: Technique, complications, and implant survival rates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod
2008
; 106: 511-5.
3. Eratalay K, Demiralp B, Akincibay H, Tozum TF: Localized edentulous ridge augmentation with upside down osteotomy prior to implant placement. Dent Traumatol 20: 300, 2004.
4. Bernstein S, Cooke J, Fotek P, Wang HL: Vertical bone augmentation: where are we
now? Implant Dent 15: 219, 2006.
5. Petrungaro PS, Amar S: Localized ridge augmentation with allogenic block grafts prior to implant placement: case reports and histologic evaluations. Implant Dent 14: 139,
2005.
6. Reinert S, Konig S, Bremerich A, Eufinger H, Krimmel M: Stability of bone grafting and
placemen
t of implants in the severely atrophic maxilla. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41: 249,
2003.
7. Chiapasco M, Consolo U, Bianchi A, Ronchi P: Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a multicenter prospective study on humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:
399, 2004.
8. Amir LR, Becking AG, Jovanovic A, Perdijk FB, Everts V, Bronckers AL: Vertical distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible: A prospective morphometric study.
Clin Oral Implants Res 17: 417, 2006.
9. Laster Z, Rachmiel A, Jensen OT. Alveolar width distraction osteogenesis for early implant placement. Journal of Oral and MaxillofacialSurgery, 2005: 63: 1724-30.
10. Oda T ve ark. Horizontal alveolar distraction of the narrow maxillary ridge for implant placement. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery, 2004: 62: 1530-34.
11. Davo R, Malevez C, Rojas J. Immediate function in the atrophic maxilla using zygoma
implants: A preliminary study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2007: 97: 44-51.
12. Woo I, Le BT: Maxillary sinus floor elevation: Review of anatomy and two techniques. Implant Dent 13: 28, 2004.
13. Morrison A, Chiarot M, Kirby S. Mental nerve function after inferior alveolar nerve transposition for placement of dental implants. Journal of Canadian Dental
Association, 2002: 68: 46-50.
14. Jensen OT. Alveolar segmental 'sandwich' osteotomies for posterior edentulous mandibular sites for dental implants. Journal of Oral and MaxillofacialSurgery, 2006: 64: 471-75.
15. Proussaefs P, Lozada J. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: Clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation. J Oral
Implantol 32: 237, 1999.
16. Liang H, Fredriksen NL, Benson BW. Lingual vascular canals of the interforaminal region of the mandible: evaluation with conventional tomography. Dento Maxillo
Facial Radiology, 2004: 33: 340-41.
17. Lamas-Pelayo J, Penarrocha-Diago M, Marti-Bowen E, Penarrocha- Diago M. Intraoperative complications during oral implantology. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Aprl; 13 (4): E239-43.
18. Isaacson TJ. Sublingual hematoma formation during immediate placement of mandibular endosseous implants. Journal of the American Dental Association, 2004: 135: 168-72.
19. Kraut RA, Chahal O. Management of patients with trigeminal nevre injuries after mandibular implant placement. Journal of the American Dental Association, 2002: 133:
1351-54.
20. Kim SG. Implant-related damage to an adjacent tooth: a case report. Implant Dent.
2000; 9 (3): 278-80.
21. Raghoebar GM ve ark. Etiology and management of mandibular fractures associated with endosteal implants in the atrophic mandible. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology
and Endodontics, 2000: 89: 533-39.
22. Jung JH ve ark. A retrospective study of the effects on sinus complications of exposing dental implants to the maxillary sinus cavity.
6
Büyükakyüz
N. , Darwish A.
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endontics 2007: 103:
623-25.
23. Tehemar SH. Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jan-Feb; 14 (1): 127-36.
24. Felisati G, Lozza P, Chiapasco M, Borloni R. Endoscopic removal of an unusual foreign
body in the sphenoid sinus: an oral implant. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 18, 2007; 776-780.
25. Fields RT, Schow SR. Aspiration and ingestion of foreign bodies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A review of the literature and report of five cases. Journal of Oral and MaxillofacialSurgery, 1998: 56:
1091-98.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com