You are here

Home » Content

PROTETIK TEDAVİDE YAŞAM KALİTESİ DEĞERLENDİRME YÖNTEMLERİ

EVALUATION METHODS OF ORAL HEALTH QUALITY OF LIFE IN PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Traditional measures of health outcomes do not capture the full impact of treatment on health status. The patient's point of view regarding satisfaction with care and health-related quality of life is increasingly recognized as an important outcome of care. This has led to the development of tools that are relevant in measuring these concepts. In Dentistry, as in other branches of Medicine, it has been recognised that objective measures of disease provide little insight into the impact of oral disorders on daily living and quality of life. This paper reviews the literature regarding the development and use of these oral health related QoL measures and includes an appraisal of future research needs in this area.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sağlık verilerinin geleneksel değerlendirme yöntemleri tedavinin sağlık durumu üzerine etkilerini ölçmede tam anlamıyla yeterli değildir. Hasta memnuniyeti ve hastanın sağlığa bağlı yaşam kalitesi ile ilgili görüşü tedavi açısından giderek önem kazanmaktadır. Bu durum, ölçüm yapacak araçların geliştirilmesini sağlamıştır. Tıbbın diğer disiplinlerinde olduğu gibi diş hekimliğinde de hastalığın objektif ölçütleri, ağız rahatsızlıklarının günlük yaşam ve yaşam kalitesi hakkında fikir vermektedir. Bu çalışma da ağız sağlığının, yaşam kalitesi değerlendirme metotları ile ilgili literatürlerin bir derlemesidir ve gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalara ışık tutacaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-protetik-tedavide-yasam-kalitesi-degerlendirme-yontemleri.pdf
  • 1-2
59
65
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Arslantaş D, Metintaş S, Ünsal A, Kalyoncu C. Eskişehir Mahmudiye ilçesi yaşlılarında yaşam kalitesi. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, 2006: 28: 81¬9.
2.
Avcı K, Pala K. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesinde Çalışan Araştırma Görevlisi ve Uzman Doktorların Yaşam Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp
Fakültesi Dergisi, 2004: 30: 81-5.
64
Aktaş B., Ceylan G., Mumcu E., Aksüzek Ö., Ünalan F.
3. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. J Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 1997: 25 (4): 284-90.
4. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health, 1994: 11 (1): 3-11.
5. Allen PF. Assessment of oral health related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2003, 1:40:10.1186/1477-7525-1-40.
6. Nuttall NM, Steele JG, Pine CM, White D, Pitts NB. The impact of oral health on people in the UK in 1998. Br Dent J, 2001: 190 (3): 121-6.
7. McGrath C, Bedi R. A national study of the importance of oral health to life quality to inform scales of oral health related quality of
life. Qual Life Res, 2004: 13 (4): 813-8.
8. McGrath C, Bedi R. Measuring the impact of oral health on quality of life in Britain using
OHQoL-UK(W). J Public Health Dent, 2003: 63 (2): 73-7.
9. McGrath C, Bedi R. Population based norming of the UK oral health related quality of life
measure (OHQoL-UK). Br Dent J, 2002: 193
(9): 521-4.
10. Tubert-Jeannin S, Riordan PJ, Morel-Papernot A, Porcheray S, Saby-Collet S. Validation of an oral health quality of life index (GOHAI) in France. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol,
2003: 31: 275-84.
11. Heydecke G, Tedesco LA, Kowalski C, Inglehart MR. Complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life-do coping styles matter? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol,
2004: 32(4): 297-306.
12. Robinson PG, Gibson B, Khan FA, Birnbaum W. A comparison of OHIP and OIDP as interviews and questionnaires. Community Dent Health, 2001: 18 (3): 144-9.
13. Kressine NR, Reisine S, Spiro III A, Jones JA. Is negative affectivity associated with oral quality of life? Community Dent Oral
Epidemiol, 2001: 29: 412-23.
14. Allen PF, McMillan AS. A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2003: 14 (2): 173-9.
15. Awad MA, Locker D, Korner-Bitensky N, Feine JS. Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality
of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial.
J Dent Res, 2007: 79 (9): 1659-63.
16. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont, 2003: 16 (2): 117-22.
17. Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D,
Klemetti E, Chehade A. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Int J Prosthodont, 2003: 16 (4): 390-6.
18. Yoshida M, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Hiasa K. Correlation Between Quality of Life and Denture Satisfaction in Elderly Complete Denture Wearers. Int J Prosthodont, 2001: 14: 77-80.
19. Knezovic-Zlatric D, Celebic A, Valentic-Peruzovic M, Jerolimov V, Celic R, Filipovic-Zore I, Alajbeg I. Patients' satisfaction with partial denture therapy. Acta Stomat Croat,
2000: 373-378.
20. Heydecke G, Klemetti E, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses. Int J
Prosthodont, 2003: 16: 307-312.
21. de Baat C, van Aken AA, Mulder J, Kalk W.
''Prosthetic condition'' and patients' judgment of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent, 1997:
78: 472-478.
22. Wolff A, Gadre A, Begleiter A, Moskana D, Cardash H. Correlation between patient satisfaction with complete dentures and denture quality, oral condition, and flow rate of submandibular/sublingual salivary glands. Int J
Prosthodont, 2003: 16: 45-48.
23. Sutton AF, Worthington HV, McCord JF. RCT
Comparing Posterior Occlusal Forms for Complete Dentures. J Dent Res, 2007: 86: 651¬655.
24. Sutton AF, Glenny AM, McCord JF. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: denture chewing surface designs in edentulous people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD004941. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004941. pub2.
25. Sutton AF, Worthington HV, McCord JF. A
randomized clinical trial comparing anatomic, lingualized, and zero-degree posterior occlusal
Protetik Tedavide
Yaşam
Kalitesi
Değerlendirme Yöntemleri
forms for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent,
2007: 97: 292-8.
26. Heydecke G, Vogeler M, Wolkewitz
M
, Türp JC, Strub JR. Simplified versus comprehensive fabrication of complete dentures: Patient ratings of denture satisfaction from a randomized crossover trial. Quintessence Int, 2008: 39: 107¬116.
27. Rehmann P, Balkenhol
M
, Ferger P, Wöstmann B. Influence of the Occlusal Consept of Complete Dentures on Patient Satisfaction in the Initial Phase After Fitting: Bilateral Balanced Occlusion vs Canine Guidance. Int J Prosthodont, 2008: 21: 60-61.
28. Roessler DM. Complete denture success for patients and dentists. Int Dent J, 2003: 53: 340¬5.
65
29. Al Quran F, Clifford T, Cooper C, Lamey P-J. İnfluence of psychological factors on the acceptance of complete dentures, The Gerodontology Association 2001, volume 18. No.1.
30. Fenlon MR, Sherriff M, Newton JT. The
influence of personality on patients' satisfaction with existing and new complete dentures. Journal of Dentistry, 2007: 35: 744-48.
31. M.T. John, W. Micheelis, J.G. Steele. Depression as a risk factor for denture dissatisfaction. Journal of Dental Research, 2007: 86, 9; Career and Technical Education pg. 852.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com