You are here

Home » Content

KEMO-MEKANIK ÇURUK UZAKLAŞTIRMA SİSTEMİNİN (CARISOLV) DENTİN BAĞLAYICI AJANLARIN HİBRİDİZASYONUNA ETKİSİ

THE EFFECT OF CHEMO-MECHANICAL CARIES REMOVAL SYSTEM (CARISOLV) ON HYBRIDISATION OF DENTIN BONDING AGENTS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The objective of this study was to investigate of the resin-dentin interface of different dentin adhesive systems (self-etching and total-etching adhesive systems) bonded to caries-affected dentin, exposed using with a chemo-mechanical caries removal system (Carisolv). Ten extracted upper and lower 1th and 2nd molar teeth with occlusal caries lesions and four sound teeth for the control were used. Occlusal caries depth standardized with DIAGNOdent and mm-measurement bite-wing radiographs were selected for the study. After the teeth were sectioned mesio-distal plan. After the treatment with Carisolv of the carious and sound dentin surfaces of the teeth, one self-etching and one total-etching dentin bonding systems were applied to the dentin surfaces according to the manufacturer's instructions and composite resin was built up onto it. Resin-dentin interfaces of the specimens were examined under a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The resin tag formation created in caries affected dentin exposed after Carisolv treatment was shorter than the sound dentin. The total-etch dentin bonding system produced more resin tag formation than the self-etch dentin bonding system in caries affected dentin. Both dentin adhesives created longer resin tag formation in sound dentin when compared to caries affected dentin.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmamızda kemo-mekanik çürük uzaklaştırma sistemi Carisolv'ün, çürükten etkilenmiş dentin yüzeyine uygulanan farklı yapıdaki dentin bağlayıcı ajanların adezyonuna etkisinin SEM ile incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çekimine karar verilmiş, milimetrik ölçekli ısırma radyografileri ve DIAGNOdent ölçümleri ile lezyon derinliklerinin benzer olduğu saptanan 10 adet oklüzal çürüklü ve kontrol amacıyla 4 adet sağlam 1. ve 2. büyük azı dişleri toplanmıştır. Toplanan dişler daha sonra mesio-distal planda kesilmiştir. Çürüklü ve sağlam örnek yüzeylerine Carisolv uygulanmasından sonra birisi self-etch ve diğeride de total-etch dentin adeziv olan dentin bağlayıcı materyalleri uygulanmıştır. Restorasyonlar daha sonra bir hibrit kompozit materyali uygulanarak tamamlanmış ve örnekler gerekli hazırlama aşamalarından sonra SEM'de incelenmiştir. Yapılan SEM incelemesinde Carisolv ile çürüğün uzaklaştırılmasından sonra çürükten etkilenmiş dentinde, sağlam dentin örneklerine göre daha kısa reçine uzantılarının oluştuğu gözlenmiştir. Total-etch adeziv sistem, self-etch adeziv sisteme göre çürükten etkilenmiş dentinde daha fazla sayıda reçine uzantıları oluşturmuştur. Her iki adeziv sistemde, sağlam dentin örneklerinde çürükten etkilenmiş dentin örneklerine oranla daha uzun reçine uzantıları sergilenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kemo-mekanik-curuk-uzaklastirma-sisteminin-carisolv-dentin-baglayici-ajanlarin-hibridizasyonuna-etkisi.pdf
  • 1
7
14
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentin: diagnosis and treatment. Oper Dent. 1979; 4:
63-70.
2. Banerjee A, Kidd EAM, Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentin excavation. Caries Res. 2000; 34: 144-150.
3. Fusayama T. Clinical guide for removing caries using a caries detecting solution. Quintessence Int. 1988; 19: 397-401.
4. Berggren U & Meynert G. Dental fear and avoidance: Causes, symptoms, and consequences. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984; 109: 247-251.
5. Green RM, Green A. Adult attidudes to dentistry among dental attenders in south Wales. Br Dent J. 1985; 159: 157-160.
6. Shovelton DS. The maintenance of pulp vitality. Br Dent J. 1972; 133: 95-101.
7. Stanley HR, Swedlow H. Biological effects of various cutting methods in cavity preparation: The part pressure plays in pulpal response. J
Am Dent Assoc. 1960; 61: 450-456.
8. Habib CM, Kronman JH, Goldman M. A
chemical evaluation of collogen and hydroxyproline after treatment with GK-101 (N-Choloroglycine). Pharmacol Ther Dent.
1975; 2: 245-248.
9. Beeley JA, Yip HK, Stevenson AG. Chemomechanical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments. Br
Dent J. 2000; 188: 427-430.
10. Ericson D, Zimmerman
M
, Raber H, Götrik B, Bornstein R, Thorell J. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. Caries
Res. 1999; 33: 171-177.
11. Inaba D, Ruben J, Takagi O, Arends J. Effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment on
Erdemir U., Yıldız E., Yüce14
remineralization of human dentine in vitro.
Caries Res. 1996; 30: 218-224.
12. Nakamura H, Asai K, Fujita H, Nakazato H, Nishimura Y, Feruse Y Sahashi E. The solvent action os sodium hypochlorite on bovine tendon collogen, bovine pulp and bovine gingival. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol. 1985; 60: 322-326.
13. Davies J, Horwitz D, Davies K. Potential roles of hypochlorous acid and N-chloramines in collogen breakdown by phagocytic cells in synovitis. Free Radic Biol Med. 1993; 15:
637-643.
14. Darle C, Bornstein R. Chemomechanical caries removal, 1st ed., Sweden: Mediteam;
2000.
15. Berlotti C. Conditioning dentine. Oper Dent.
Suppl 1992; 5: 131.
16. Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ. Does chemomechanical caries removal affect
dentine adhesion? Eur J Oral Sci. 2000; 108: 449-455.
17. Harada N, Sonoda H, Shimada Y, Inai N, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Effect of chemo-mechanical caries removal on dentin bonding.
J Dent Res. 2000; 79: 372 abstract #1832.
18. Suda S, Maseki T, Nara Y, Tanaka H.
Bonding of resin adhesive system to dentine treated with the chemo-mechanical caries removal system Carisolv. J Dent Res. 2000; 79: 372 Abstract #1829.
19. Hashimoto K, Tonami K, Shimizu K, et al. The surface of the cavity floor dentine by Carisolv. The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry 1999; 42: 619-622.
20. Schutzbank SG, Galaini J, Kronman JH,
Goldman M, Clark RE. A comparative in vitro study of GK-101 and GK-101E in caries
removal. J Dent Res. 1978; 57: 861-864.
21. Splieth C, Rosin M, Gellissen B. Determination of residuel dentine caries after conventional mechanical and chemomechani-cal caries removal with Carisolv. Clin Oral
Invest. 2001; 5: 250-253.
22. Wennerberg A, Sawase T, Kultje C. The influence of Carisolv on enamel and dentine surface topography. Eur J Oral Sci. 1999; 107:
297-306.
23. Tandon S, Silas A. Caridex: Dentine topography and bond strength evaluation.
Indian J Dent Res. 1992; 3: 76-82.
24.
Çehrel
i ZC, Yazıcı AR, Akca T, Ozgünaltay G. A morphological and micro-tensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected human dentine after four different caries removal techniques. J Dent.
2003; 31: 429-435.
25. Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Gendusa NJ. Dentin adhesion of modified 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater.
1992; 8: 259-64.
26. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Interfacial micromorphology of three adhesive systems created in caries-affected dentine. Am J Dent. 2003; 16: 202-206.
27. Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J et al. Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious
dentin. J Dent Res. 2002; 81: 556-560.
28. Nakajima M, Ogata M, Okuda M, Tagami J Sano H, Pashley DH. Bonding to caries-affected dentine using self-etching primers.
Am J Dent. 1999; 12: 309-314.
29. Haller B. Recent developments in dentin
bonding. Am J Dent. 2000; 13: 44-50.
30. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM,
Itthagaruna A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002; 30: 371¬382.
31. Noort RV. Enamel and Dentine bonding. Introduction to dental materials 2nd ed. Mosby
2002.
32. B Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. In: Advanced adhesive dentistry 3rd International Kuraray
Symposium, 1999. First Edition, Italy. 2000: 130-148.
33. Toledano M, Osorio R, Leonardi GD, Leal
JIR, Ceballos L, Vilchez MAC. Influence of
self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentine. Am J Dent. 2001; 14:
205-210.
34. Croll TP. Self-etching adhesive system for
resin bonding. J Dent Child. 2000; 67: 176¬181.
35. Yazıcı AR, Akca T, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. Bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system to caries-affected dentine. Oper Dent.
2004; 29: 176-181.
36. Hosoya Y, Kawashita GW, Marshall Jr, Goto G. Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to
KKğtno-Mekanik Çürük Uzaklaştırma Sisteminin (Carisolv) Dentin Bağlayıcı Ajanların Hibridizasyonuna Etkisi
sound human primary dentin and young
permanen
t dentin. J Dent. 2001; 29: 163-171.
37. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent. Suppl
2001; 6: 119-144.
38. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M,
Meerbeek BV. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 118-132.
39. Banerjee A, Kidd EAM, Watson TF. Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation. J
Dent. 2000; 28: 179-186.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com