You are here

Home » Content

ALT ÇENE KAYNAKLI İSKELETSEL SINIF II OLGULARDA YÜZ DERİNLİĞİNİN SEFALOMETRİK OLARAK DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

THE CEPHALOMETRIC ASSESMENT OF THE FACIAL DEPTH IN SKELETALLY SINIF II INDIVIDUALS WITH MANDIBULAR DEFICIENCY

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to investigate facial depth of patients with Class II malocclusion combined mandibular deficiency and to evaluate the relationship between the facial depth distance and anterior facial height. For this purpose, the distance between the projections of condylion and Nasion points on Frankfort horizontal plane was defined as facial depth (Co'-N') and this variable was compared with anterior facial height to identify a facial proportion.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, alt çene kaynaklı iskeletsel Sınıf II maloklüzyon gösteren hastalarda ortalama yüz derinliği tespit edilerek, bu mesafe ile ön yüz yüksekliği arasındaki ilişki araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla condylion noktası ile nasion noktasının Frankfort Horizontal düzlemindeki (FH) izdüşümleri arasındaki mesafe Yüz Derinlik Mesafesi (Co'-N') olarak tanımlanmış ve bu mesafe ile ön yüz yüksekliği karşılaştırılarak belirli bir oran saptanmaya çalışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-alt-cene-kaynakli-iskeletsel-sinif-ii-olgularda-yuz-derinliginin-sefalometrik-olarak-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 3
13
22
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Coben SE. The sphenooccipital synchondrosis: the missing link between the profession's concept of craniofacial growth and orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114: 709-712.
2. Kuroe K, Rosas A, Molleson T. Variation in the cranial base orientation and facial skeleton in dry skulls sampled from three major populations. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 201-207.
3. Dhopatkar A, Bhatia SN, Rock P. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2002; 72: 456-463.
4. Anderson D, Popovich F. Relation of the cranial base form and mandibular position. Am JPhys Anthrop 1983; 61: 181-187.
5. Dibbets JM. Morphological associations between the Angle classes. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18: 111-118.
6. Bastir M, Rosas A, Kuroe K. Petrosal orientation and mandibular ramus breadth: evidence for an integrated petroso-mandibular developmental unit. Am J Phys Anthrop 2004; 123: 340-350.
7. Bastir M, Rosas A. Correlated variation between the lateral basicranium and the face: a
geometric morphometric study in different human groups. Arch Oral Biol 2006; 51: 814¬824.
8. Ricketts, R.M. A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1960, 46, 330-57.
9. Harvold, E,P, The Activator in Interceptive Orthodontics, C.V., Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
10. McNamara, J.A. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Needham press michigan chapter 28, 2001.
11. Steiner, C.C. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1953, 39, 729-755.
12. Schulholf, J. Manual R.M.D.S computerized cephalometrics, Revised edition, Rocky mountain data system Inc, Sherman Oaks, California, 1973.
13. Pancherz, H., Gokbuget, K. The reliability of the Frankfort Horizontal in Roentgenogratic cephalometry. Euro J Orthod 1996, 18, 4, 367¬372.
14.
Özen, C, Sözen, H. Adli Tıp ve Toksikoloji, İstanbul Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Basımevi, 1971.
15. Enlow, DH., Harris, DB. A study of postnatal growth of the human mandible. Am. J Orthod 1964, 50, 25-49.
16. Enlow, DH, Hans, MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company 1996, 1-110.
17.
Harorli, AB., Akgül, MH., Dağistan, S. Diş hekimliği radyolojisi. Erzurum: Eser ofset, 2006, 359-375.
18. Nagasawa, T., Yanbin, X., Tsuga, K., Abe, Y. Sex difference of eleetromyogram of masticatory muscles and mandibular movement during chewing of food. J Oral Rehabil 1997, 24, 605-609.
19. Zivko-Babic, J., Panduric ,J., Jerolimov ,V., Mioc, M., Pizeta, L., Jakovac, M. Bite force in subjects with complete dentition. Coll. Antropol 2002, 26, 293-302.
20. Wylie, W.L. The assessment of anteroposterior dyspiasia. Angle Orthod 1947, 17, 97-109.
21. Burstone, CI, James, RB., Legan, HL., Murphy, GA., Norton, LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978, 36, 269-77.
22. McNamara, J.A. A method of cephalometric evaluation, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1984, 86, 449-69.
22
Fidan Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, Osman Bengi, Hüseyin Ölmez
23. Başçiftci, F.A, Uysal, T., Büyükerkmen, A. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004, 125, 3, 366-72.
24. Nanda, R.S. The rates of growth of several facial components measured from serial
cephalometric roentgenograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1955, 41, 658-673.
25. Bjork, A. Cranial base development. Am J Orthod 1955, 41, 198-225.
26.
Duyar, I. Ergenlik çağındaki çocuklarda yüz ve alt çene büyümesi: kesitsel bir araştırmanın sonuçları. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi 1998, 11, 13¬19.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com