You are here

Home » Content

ALT ÇENE ÖN BÖLGEYE YERLEŞTİRİLEN İMPLANTLARIN REZONANS FREKANS ANALİZİ DEĞERLERİ İLE KEMİK TİPLERİNİN İLİŞKİSİ

The Assessment of the Stability of Implants Placed in the Mandibular Interforaminal Region in Relation to Bone Quality

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The purpose of Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) is to assess the stability of dental implants in bone. It is expected that one of the factors influencing the RFA results is the bone quality, thus the aim of this study was to examine the relation between subjectively scored bone quality and implant stability. Material and Methods: 27 patients with 54 same sized implants placed in the mandibular interforaminal region by the same surgeon were included in the study. The surgeon has scored the bone quality according to the resistance felt during bone drilling. Additionally, the stability of the placed implants were measured with the Osstell™ mentor via Smartpeg™'s and the ISQ scores recorded. Results: While there was no type IV bone case among the patients, there were 4 cases of type I bone, 17 type II and 6 type III bones. No statistically significant differences were detected between the ISQ values of the bilaterally placed implants in relation to bone qualtiy types (p>0.05). Conclusion: According to the results of this study it is not advisable to relate the RFA scores with the bone quality type.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Rezonans frekans analizinin (RFA) amacı implantların kemik içindeki stabilitesini ölçmektir. Bu stabiliteyi etkileyebilecek faktörlerden birinin kemik yoğunluğu olduğu beklenebileceği için, bu çalışmada klinik olarak tedavi sırasında hastalardaki kemik yoğunluğu ile ölçülen RFA değerlerinin arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 27 hastada 54 implant alt çene interforaminal bölgede 33 ve 43 nolu bölgelere aynı hekim tarafından her birinin çap ve boyu 4,5/13 mm olacak şekilde yerleştirilmiştir. Operasyon sırasında, cerrahi işlemleri gerçekleştiren hekim tarafından yuva açtığı sırada hissettiği direnci değerlendirmek suretiyle kemik sınıflaması yapılmış ve kaydedilmiştir. Ayrıca Osstell™ mentor cihazı ile Smartpeg™'lere 90° açı yapacak şekilde uygulanarak 2 farklı yönde iki ölçüm gerçekleştirilmiş ve bunların aritmetik ortalaması alınarak tek bir ISQ skoru olarak kaydedilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan hastaların alt çene kemik tipleri 4 bireyde Tip 1, 17 bireyde Tip 2, 6 bireyde de Tip 3 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bireylerin hiçbirinde Tip 4 kemiğe rastlanmamıştır. Kemik tipine göre hastalardan alınan ISQ değerlerinde, gerek 33 nolu implantlarda gerekse de 43 nolu imp-lantlarda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmamıştır (p>0.05). Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına dayanarak, sadece RFA değerlerine dayanarak kemik tipi sınıflaması yapılmasının güvenilir bir yöntem olmadığı iddia edilebilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-alt-cene-bolgeye-yerlestirilen-implantlarin-rezonans-frekans-analizi-degerleri-ile-kemik-tiplerinin-iliskisi.pdf
  • 1
24
31
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Branemark
PI
. Introduction to osseo-integration. İçinde: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editörler. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Pub Co Inc, 1985; p. 11-14.
2.
Albrektsso
n T, Wennerberg A. The impact of oral implants - past and future, 1966-2042. J Can Dent Assoc, 2005; 71(5): 327.
3.
Hob
o S, Ichida E, Garcia LT. Osseointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation. Tokyo: Quintessence Pub, 1990.
4.
Meredit
h N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996; 7(3): 261-67.
5.
Meredit
h N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on im¬plants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1997; 8(3):
226-33.
6. Nedir
R
, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res,
2004; 15(5): 520-28.
7.
Sennerb
y L, Roos J. Surgical deter-
O. Geçkili, H. Bilhan
minants of clinical success of osseointegrat-ed oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont, 1998; 11(5): 408-20.
8.
Lioubavina-Hac
k N, Lang NP, Kar¬ring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin
Oral Implants Res, 2006; 17(3): 244-50.
9.
O'Sulliva
n D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res,
2004; 15(4): 474-80.
10.
O'Sulliva
n D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial sta¬bility of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent
Relat Res, 2000; 2(2): 85-92.
11.
Moll
y L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral
Implants Res, 2006; 17(2): 124-35.
12.
Lekhol
m U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. İçinde:Brânemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editörler. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985, p. 199-209.
13.
Aparici
o C, Lang NP, Rangert B. Validity and clinical significance of biome-chanical testing of implant/bone interface.
Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006; 17(2): 2-7.
14.
Meredit
h N, Shafie HR. Clinical applications for the measurement of implant stability using OsstellTM Mentor. İçinde Shafie HR, editör. Clinical and Laboratory manual of implant overdentures. Oxford:
Blackwell, 2007, p. 206-209
15.
Friber
g B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical res¬onance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999; 28(4): 266-72.
16.
Glause
r R, Sennerby L, Meredith
30
Alt Çene Ön Bölgeye Yerleştirilen İmplantların Rezonans Frekans Analizi Değerleri ile Kemik
Tiplerinin İlişkisi
N, Ree
A
, Lundgren A, Gottlow J ve ark. Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing im¬plants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004; 15(4):
428-34.
17. Özbey F. Titanyum Dioksit İle Pürüzlendirilmiş ve Titanyum Dioksit İle Pürüzlendirilip Flor İle Modifiye Edilmiş İmplant Yüzeylerinin Kemik İçi Stabilitel-erinin Rezonans Frekans Analizi Yöntemi İle Karşılaştırılması. Master Tezi, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, 2005.
18.
Rasmusso
n L, Meredith N, Senne-rby L. Measurements of stability changes of titanium implants with exposed threads subjected to barrier membrane induced bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1997; 8(4): 316-22.
19.
Elia
s JJ, Brunski JB, Scarton HA. A dynamic modal testing technique for noninvasive assessment of bone-dental implant interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1996; 11(6): 728-34.
20.
Iye
r S, Weiss C, Mehta A. Effects of drill speed on heat production and quality of bone formation in dental implant oste¬otomies. Part II: relationship between drill speed and healing. Int J Prosthodont, 1997; 10(6): 536-40.
21. Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. A re¬moval torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1991; 2(1): 24-29.
22.
Rasmusso
n L, Kahnberg KE, Tan A. Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability: an experimental study in the dog mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2001; 3(1): 2-8.
23.
Won
g M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R,
Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res, 1995; 29(12): 1567-75.
24.
Huan
g HM, Lee SY, Yeh CY, Lin CT. Resonance frequency assessment of dental implant stability with various bone qualities: a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002; 13(1): 65-74.
25.
Balsh
i SF, Allen FD, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. A resonance frequency analysis assessment of maxillary and mandibular immediately loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxil-
lofac Implants, 2005; 20(4): 584-94.
26.
Barewa
l RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003; 18(5): 641-51.
27.
Friber
g B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999; 28(4): 297-303.
28. Löpez
A
B , Diago MP, Cortissoz OM, Martinez IM. Resonance frequency analysis after the placement of 133 dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2006; 11(3): 272-76.
29.
O'Sulliva
n D, Sennerby L, Jagger D, Meredith N. A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clin
Implant Dent Relat Res, 2004; 6(1):48-57.
30. Östman
PO
, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont, 2006; 19(1): 77-83.
31. Türkyılmaz I, Tümer
C
, Özbek EN, Tözüm TF. Relations between the bone den¬sity values from computerized tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical
31
O. Geçkili, H. Bilhan
study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clin Periodontal, 2007; 34(8): 716-22.
32. Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003; 18(5): 641-51.
33. Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Boss¬hardt DD, Salvi GE, Lang NP. Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res,
2007; 18(3): 275-80.
34. Zix J, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Stability measurements of 1-stage implants in the maxilla by means of resonance frequency analysis: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005; 20(5):
747-52.
35. Valderrama P, Oates TW, Jones AA, Simpson J, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability: a clinical trial. J Periodontol, 2007; 78(2): 262-72.
36. Handelsman M. Surgical guidelines for dental implant placement. Br Dent J, 2006; 201(3): 139-52.
37. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Mumcu E, Boz-dag E, Sunbuloglu E, Kutay O. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone. J Oral Rehabil, 2010; 37(12): 900-907.
38. Trisi P, Rao W. Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1999; 10(1): 1-7.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com