You are here

KOMPOZİT REÇİNELERİN FARKLI ADEZİV ESASLI BAĞLAYICI AJANLAR İLE ONARIMINDA MİKRO-MAKASLAMA KUVVETLERİNİN BAĞLANMA DAYANIMINA ETKİSİ

Effect of Different Adhesive Systems on Repair Bond Strength of Resin Composites

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: Purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different adhesive systems on repair bond strength of a resin composite. Material and Methods: 60 composite discs were build. Half of the discs were subjected to thermal aging. Aged and non-aged specimens were repaired with resin composite using three different adhesive systems; then subjected to micro-shear forces. data were analyzed statistically (p<0,05). Results: Adhesive systems and aging affected the bond strengths (p<0,001). In non-aged groups; there was no statistical difference between groups bonded with 2 step self-etch and 1 step total-etch adhesive. Other groups were statistically different (p<0,05). In aged groups; there were statistical difference between groups bonded with 2 step self-etch and 1 step self-etch adhesive. Other groups were not statistically different (p<0,05). Conclusion: 2 step self-etch and 1 step total-etch adhesives exhibited higher micro shear bond stregth values of aged composites.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı yaşlandırılmış kompozit reçinelerin farklı adeziv ajanlar kullanılarak yapılan onarımlarında ilgili materyallerin bağlanma dayanımlarında mikromakaslama kuvvetlerinin etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kompozit reçine esaslı 8x5 mm boyutlarında 60 adet disk şeklinde örnek hazırlandı. Örneklerin bağlanma dayanımları mikromakaslama test cihazında ölçüldü ve elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi (p<0,05). Bulgular: Adeziv ajanın ve yaşlandırma yönteminin sonuçlar üzerinde istatistiksel olarak etkinliği saptandı (p<0,001). Yaşlandırma işlemi uygulanmayan gruplardan 2 aşamalı self-etch adeziv ajan grubuyla tek aşamalı total-etch adeziv ajan grubu arasında fark bulunamazken diğer gruplar arasında istatistiksel fark bulunmaktadır (p<0,05). Yaşlandırma yapılan gruplardan 2 aşamalı self-etch adeziv ajan grubuyla tek aşamalı self-etch adeziv ajan grubu arasında farklılık bulunmaktayken (p<0,05); diğer gruplar arasında istatistiksel fark bulunmamaktadır. Sonuç: Yaşlanmış kompozit reçinelerin onarımları mikromakaslama kuvvetlerine dayanım açısından değerlendirildiğinde, iki aşamalı self-etch ve total-etch adeziv ajanlar, tek aşamalı self-etch adeziv ajanlara göre daha yüksek bağlanma dayanım değerleri göstermiştir.
17
27

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Moncada G, Martin J, Fernandez E,
Hempel MC, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Sealing,
refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class
II defective restorations: a three-year clinical
trial. J Am Dent Assoc, 2009; 140: 425-32.
2. Gordan VV, Shen C, Riley III J, Mjor
IA. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair
versus replacement of composite restorations.
J Esthet Restor Dent, 2006; 18: 144-53.
3. Foitzik M, Attin T. Filling revision
- possibilities and execution. Schweiz
Monatsschr Zahnmed, 2004; 114: 1003-11.
4. Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Blaser PK,
Mondragon E, Mjor IA. A long-term evaluation
of alternative treatments to replacement
Ö. Irmak
25
of resin-based composite restorations: results
of a seven-year study. J Am Dent Assoc,
2009; 140: 1476- 84.
5. Blum IR, Jagger DC, Newton JT, Wilson
NH. The opinions of manufacturers of
resin-based composite materials towards the
repair of failing composite restorations. Prim
Dent Care, 2009; 16: 149-53.
6. Moncada G, Fernandez E, Martin J,
Arancibia C, Mjor IA, Gordan VV, et al.
Increasing the longevity of restorations by
minimal intervention: a two-year clinical
trial. Oper Dent, 2008; 33: 258-64.
7. Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair,
refurbishing and longevity of restorations.
Oper Dent, 2002; 27: 528-34.
8. Blum IR, Schriever A, Heidemann D,
Mjör IA, Wilson NH. Repair versus replacement
of defective direct composite restorations
in teaching programmes in United
Kingdom and Irish dental schools. Eur J
Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2002; 10: 151-55.
9. Gordan VV, Shen C, Riley J 3rd, Mjör
IA. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair
versus replacement of composite restorations.
J Esthet Restor Dent, 2006; 18: 144-53.
10. Lastumaki TM, Kallio TT, Vallittu
PK. The bond strength of light-curing composite
resin to finally polymerized and aged
glass fiber-reinforced composite substrate.
Biomater, 2002; 23: 4533-39.
11. Soderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables
influencing the repair strength of dental composites.
Scand J Dent Res, 1991; 99: 173-80.
12. Söderholm KJM, Zigan M, Ragan
M, Fischlschweiger W, Berghman M. Hydrolytic
degradation of dental composites.
J Dent Res, 1984; 63: 1248-59.
13. Dall’Oca S, Papacchini F, Goracci
C, Cury AH, Suh BI, Tay FR, Polimeni
A, Ferrari M. Effect of oxygen inhibition
on composite repair strength over time. J
Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2007;
81: 493-98.
14. Burtscher P. Stability of radicals in
cured composite materials. Dent Mater,
1993; 9: 218-22.
15. Soderholm KJ. Flexure strength of
repaired dental composites. Scand J Dent
Res, 1986; 94: 364-69.
16. Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an
aged, contaminated indirect composite resin
with a direct, visible light-cured composite
resin. Oper Dent, 1993; 18: 187-94.
17. Ferracane JL, Marker VA. Solvent
degradation and reduced fracture toughness
in aged composites. J Dent Res, 1992; 71:
13-19.
18. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond
strength of repaired anterior composite
resins: an in vitro study. J Dent, 1998; 26:
685-94.
19. Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell
S, Brunson D, Roberson TM. Bonding to
resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater,
1989; 5: 417-24.
20. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW.
Build-up and repair of light-cured composites:
bond strength. J Dent Res, 1984; 63:
1241-44.
21. Brendeke J, Ozcan M. Effect of
physicochemical aging conditions on the
composite-composite repair bond strength.
J Adhes Dent, 2007; 9: 399-406.
22. Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK.
Composite-composite repair bond strength:
effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent,
2003; 31: 521-55.
23. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM,
Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface
conditioning methods on the microtensile
bond strength of resin composite to composite
after aging conditions. Dent Mater,
2007; 23: 1276-82.
24. Papacchini F, Toledano M, Monticelli
F, Osorio R, Radovic I, Polimeni A, et al. HyKompozit
Reçinelerin Farklı Adeziv Esaslı Bağlayıcı Ajanlar İle Onarımında Mikro-Makaslama
Kuvvetlerinin Bağlanma Dayanımına Etkisi
26
drolytic stability of composite repair bond.
European J Oral Sci, 2007; 115: 417-24.
25. Passos SP, Ozcan M, Vanderlei AD,
Leite FPP, Kimpara ET, Bottino MA. Bond
strength durability of direct and indirect composite
systems following surface conditioning
for repair. J Adhes Dent, 2007; 9: 443-47.
26. Kupiec KA, Barkmeier WW. Laboratory
evaluation of surface treatments for
composite repair. Oper Dent, 1996; 21: 59-
62.
27. Brosch T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein
R. Effect of combinations of surface
treatments and bonding agents on the bond
strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet
Dent, 1997; 77: 122-26.
28. Yap AU, Quek CE, Kau CH. Repair
of new-generation tooth-colored restoratives:
methods of surface conditioning to achieve
bonding. Oper Dent, 1998; 23: 173-78.
29. Yap AU, Sau CW, Lye KW. Effects of
aging on repair bond strengths of a polyacidmodified
composite resin. Oper Dent, 1999;
24: 371-76.
30. Lucena-Martın C, Gonzalez-Lopez
S, Navajas-Rodrıguez de Mondelo JM. The
effect of various surface treatments and
bonding agents on the repaired strength of
heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent,
2001; 86: 481-88.
31. Oztas N, Alacam A, Bardakcı Y. The
effect of air abrasion with two new bonding
agents on composite repair. Oper Dent, 2003;
28: 149-54.
32. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo
J Jr., Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair
pro-tocols applied to aged composite resin.
J Adhes Dent, 2005; 7: 41-49.
33. Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris
AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface
treatments and bonding agents on the
bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet
Restor Dent, 2007; 19: 90-99.
34. Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi
N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al.
Composite-to-composite microtensile bond
strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid
resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen
inhibition. J Adhes Dent, 2007; 9: 25-31.
35. Papacchini F, Monticelli F, Radovic
I, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Tay FR, et al. The
application of hydrogen peroxide in composite
repair. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl
Biomater, 2007; 82: 298-304.
36. Dall’oca S, Papacchini F, Radovic I,
Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Repair potential of
a laboratory-processed nano-hybrid resin
composite. J Oral Sci, 2008; 50: 403-12.
37. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect
of different surface treatments on the
composite-composite repair bond strength.
Clin Oral Invest, 2009; 13: 317-23.
38. Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M,
Ulker M. Initial repair bond strength of a
nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface
treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor
Dent, 2009; 21: 251-61.
39. Costa TR, Ferreira SQ, Klein-Junior
CA, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of
surface treatments and intermediate agents
used for repair of a polished composite. Oper
Dent, 2010; 35: 231-37.
40. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters
FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC,
et al. Is there one optimal repair technique
for all composites? Dent Mater, 2011; 27:
701-09.
41. Shen C, Mondragon E, Gordan VV,
Mjör IA. The effect of mechanical undercuts
on the strength of composite repair. J Am
Dent Assoc, 2004; 135: 1406-12.
42. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA.
Effect of surface treatments on the tensile
bond strength of repaired wateraged anterior
restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite.
J Dent, 2008; 36: 969-76.
Ö. Irmak
27
43. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Opdam
NJ, Roeters FJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC,
et al. Surface roughness of etched composite
resin in light of composite repair. J Dent,
2011; 39: 499-505.
44. Trajtenberg CP, Powers JM. Effect of
hydrofluoric acid on repair bond strength of
a laboratory composite. Am J Dent, 2004;
17: 173-76.
45. Pounder B, Gregory WA, Powers JM.
Bond strengths of repaired composite resins.
Oper Dent, 1987; 12: 127-31.
46. Teixeira EC, Bayne SC, Thompson
JY, et al. Shear bond strength of self-etching
bonding systems in combination with various
composites used for repairing aged
composites. J Adhes Dent, 2005; 7: 159-64.
47. Gregory WA, Pounder B, Bakus E.
Bond strengths of chemically dissimilar repaired
composite resins. J Prosthet Dent,
1990; 64: 664-68.
48. Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas
MA. Surface treatment techniques for
resin composite repair. Am J Dent, 1997;
10(6): 279-83.
49. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R,
et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance
of functional monomers. J Dent Res,
2004; 83: 454-58.
50. Celik EU, Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, Ercan
UK Tensile bond strength of an aged
resin composite repaired with different protocols.
J Adhes Dent, 2011; 13(4): 359-66.
51. Hasani Tabatabaei M, Alizade Y, Taalim
S. Effect of various surface treatment
on repair strength of composite resin J Dent
(Tehran), 2004; 1(4): 5-11.
52. Puckett AD, Holder R, O’Hara JW.
Strength of posterior composite repairs using
different composite/ bonding agent combinations.
Oper Dent, 1991; 16(4): 136-40.
53. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A,
Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano
Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging
and stability of the bonded interface. Dent
Mater, 2008; 24: 90-101.
54. Carvalho, Ricardo M, Adriana P Manso,
Saulo Geraldeli, Franklin R Tay, David
H Pashley. Durability of bonds and clinical
success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater,
2012; 28: 72-86.
55. Chee B, Rickman LJ, Satterthwaite,
JD. Adhesives for the restoration of noncarious
cervical lesions: a systematic review.
J Dent, 2012; 40: 443-52.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com