You are here

Home » Content

ANTİBAKTERİYEL İÇEREN GELENEKSEL YAPIŞTIRICI SİMANLARIN SU EMİLİMİ

Water Sorption of Conventional Luting Cements Containing Antibacterial Agents

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the water sorption of the polycarboxylate, and glass ionomer cement containing a mixture of 5% chlorhexidine diacetate/ cetrimide. Material and Methods: Seven cement discs from each material were manufactured. Antibacterial agents with a concentration of 5% were added to the powders of the cements. Specimens were subjected to water sorption test. The data were measured at day 1, week 1, month 1, and months 6. Values were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD test (p<0.05). Results: The water sorption values of polycarboxylate cement was higher than glass ionomer. While the sorption values of polycarboxylate cement with anti-bacterial agent were lower than its control, except for day 1, this situation is contrary for glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: While the addition of chlorhexidine diacetate/ cetrimide mixture decreased the water sorption of polycarboxylate cement, increased the water sorption of glass ionomer cement.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı %5 oranında klorheksidin diasetat/ cetrimide karışımını içeren polikarboksilat ve cam iyonomer simanların su emilimini incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Her materyalden 7 adet disk şeklinde örnekler hazırlanmıştır. Antibakteriyel ajan %5 oranında simanların tozuna eklenmiştir. Örnekler su emilim testine tabi tutulmuştur. Veriler 1.gün, 1. hafta, 1. ve 6. ayda değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar tek-yönlü ANOVA ve Fisher’in LSD testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir (p<0.05). Bulgular: Polikarboksilat simanın su emilimi cam iyonomerden daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Antibakteriyel ajan ilave edilmiş polikarboksilat simanın su emilimi 1. gün hariç kendi kontrolünden daha düşük iken, cam iyonomer siman için bu durum tersidir. Sonuç: Klorheksidin diasetat/ cetrimide karışımı polikarboksilat simanın su emilimini azaltırken, cam iyonomer simanın su emilimini artırmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-antibakteriyel-iceren-geleneksel-yapistirici-simanlarin-su-emilimi.pdf
  • 2
11
19
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. O’Brien WJ. Dental materials and their
selection. 3rd ed., Canada: Quintessence,
2002, p.132-54.
2. Ghanim A. Water sorption and solubility
of different commercialy available dental
cements: an in vitro study. Med J Babylon,
2010; 7(4-3): 410-21.
3. Keyf F, Tuna SH, Şen M, Safrany A.
Water sorption and solubility of different
luting and restorative dental cements. Turk
J Med Sci, 2007; 37(1): 47-55.
4. Yoshida K, Tanagawa M, Atsuta M.
In-vitro solubility of three types of resin and
conventional luting cements. J Oral Rehabil,
1998; 25(4): 285-91.
5. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ.
Dental luting agents: a review of the current
literature. J Prosthet Dent, 1998; 80(3): 280-
301.
6. Hassan AK. Antibacterial activity of
dental luting cement. J Minim Interv Dent,
2009; 2(4): 220-22.
7. Tüzüner T, Kuşgöz A, Er K, Taşdemir
T, Buruk K, Kemer B. Antibacterial activity
and physical properties of conventional
glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine
diacetate/cetrimide mixtures. J Esthet
Restor Dent, 2011; 23(1): 46-55.
8. Lewinstein I, Chweidan H, Matalon S,
Pilo R. Retention and marginal leakage of
provisional crowns cemented with provisional
cements enriched with chlorhexidine diacetate.
J Prosthet Dent, 2007; 98(5): 373-78.
9. Uludamar A, Yıldız C, Ozkan YK. Sabit
protetik restorasyonlarda kullanılan yapıştırma
simanları ve çözünürlük özellikleri.
7tepe Klinik, 2012; 3(3): 72-82.
10. Wong RH, Palamara JE, Wilson PR,
Reynolds EC, Burrow MF. Effect of CPPACP
addition on physical properties of zinc
Antibakteriyel İçeren Geleneksel Yapıştırıcı Simanların Su Emilimi
18
oxide non-eugenol temporary cements. Dent
Mater, 2011; 27(4): 329-38.
11. Sanders BJ, Gregory RL, Moore K,
Avery DR. Antibacterial and physical properties
of resin modified glass-ionomers combined
with chlorhexidine. J Oral Rehabil,
2002; 29(6): 553-58.
12. Jedrychowski JR, Caputo AA, Kerper
S. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of
restorative materials combined with chlorhexidines.
J Oral Rehabil, 1983; 10(5): 373-81.
13. Takahashi Y, Imazoto S, Kaneshiro
AV, Ebisu S, Frencken JE, Tay FR. Antibacterial
effects and physical properties of glassionomers
cements containing chlorhexidine
for the ART approach. Dent Mater, 2006;
22(7): 647-52.
14. Ali MN, Edwards M, Nicholson JW.
Zinc polycarboxylate dental cement for the
controlled release of an active organic substance:
proof of concept. J Mater Sci Mater
Med, 2010; 21(4): 1249-53.
15. Turkun LS, Turkun M, Ertugrul F,
Ateş M, Brugger S. Long-term antibacterial
effects and physical properties of a chlorhexidine-
containing glass ionomer cement. J
Esthet Restor Dent, 2008; 20(1): 29-44.
16. Tüzüner T, Ulusu T. Effect of antibacterial
agents on the surface hardness of a
conventional glass-ionomer cement. J Appl
Oral Sci, 2012; 20(1): 45-49.
17. Küçükeşmen HC, Öztaş D, Küçükeşmen
Ç, Kaplan R. Farklı tiplerdeki geleneksel
ve rezin-modifiye cam iyonomer
simanların su emilimi ve suda çözünürlüğü.
A.Ü. Diş Hek Fak Derg, 2005; 32(1): 25-34.
18. Yilmaz B, Gökay O. Farklı üç restorative
dolgu materyalinin su emilimi ve
suda çözünürlük değerleri: in vitro çalışma.
Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci, 1999; 5(1):
60-65.
19. Sevilmiş HH, Bulucu B. Adeziv materyallerin
su emilimi özellikleri. Hacettepe
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2007;
31(2): 16-21.
20. Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Rüttermann
S.Water sorption and solubility of
contemporary resin-based filling materials. J
Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2007;
82(2): 545-51.
21. Hiraishi N, Yiu CK, King NM, Tay
FR, Pashley DH. Chlorhexidine release and
water sorption characteristics of chlorhexidine-
incorporated hydrophobic/hydrophilic
resins. Dent Mater, 2008; 24(10): 1391-99.
22. Yanikoglu N, Duymus YZ. Evalution
of the solubility of dental cements in artificial
saliva of different pH values. Dent Mat J,
2007; 26(1): 62-67.
23. Swartz ML, Sears C, Phillips RW.
Solubility of cement as related to time of
exposure in water. J Prosthet Dent, 1971;
26(5): 501-05.
24. Nomoto R, McCabe JF. A simple asid
erosion test for dental water-based cements.
Dent Mat, 2001; 17(1): 53-59.
25. Um CM, Oilo G. The effect of early
water contact on glass-ionomer cements.
Quintessence Int, 1992; 23(3): 209-14.
26. Cattani-Lorente MA, Godin C, Meyer
JM. Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer
cements affected by long-term storage in
water. Dent Mater, 1994; 10(1): 37-44.
27. Mesu FP. Degradation of luting cements
mesasured in vitro. J Dent Res, 1982;
61(5): 665-72.
28. Shen C, Grimaudo N. Effect of hydration
on the biaxial flexural strength of a glass
ionomer cement. Dent Mater, 1994; 10(3):
190-95.
29. Hersek NE, Canay S. Invivo solubility
of three types of luting cement. Quintessence
Int, 1996; 27(3): 211-16.
30. International Organization for StanF.
M. Korkmaz , T. Tüzüner, B. Bağış, Ö. Baygın, S. Turgut
19
dardization. ISO 4049: 2000: Dentistrypolymer-
based filling restorative and luting
materials. Geneva: ISO, 2000. (Çevrimiçi)
http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prods-services/
ISOstore/store.html, Erişim Tarihi: 10 Nisan
2013.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com