You are here

Home » Content

KARL POPPER IN YANLIŞLAMA KURALI, HİPOTEZ TESTLERİ ve İKTİSAT

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this article Karl Popper's deductive methodology and its several criticisms are reviewed. In particular the possibilities of application of the falsification rule to economics are discussed. The relationship between the falsification rule and statistical hypothesis testing is examined within the framework of the thoughts of different statistics schools.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makalede Popper 'in tümdengelimci yöntemi ve bu yöntemin çeşitli eleştirileri gözden geçirildi, özelinde yanhşlama kuralının iktisatta uygulanma olanakları tartışıldı. Çeşitli istatistik okulların bakışları çerçevesinde yanhşlama kuralı ile istatistiksel hipotez testinin ilişkisi incelendi.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-karl-popper-yanlislama-kurali-hipotez-testleri-iktisat.pdf
  • 2
47-60
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Albert, M. (2002), Resolving Neyman's Paradox, British Society for The Phİlososphy of Science, s.69-76.
Althusser, L. (1984), Felsefe ve Bilim Adamlarının Kendiliğinden Felsefesi, Birey ve Toplum Yayıncılık, s.27-31.
Blaug, M. (1978), Economic Theory İn Retrospect, 3d. Ed., Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, s.714.
Blaug, M. (1992), The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, s.23.
Boland, L.A. (1990), Understanding The Popperian Legacy in Economics, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 7, s.273-284.
Cohen, J. (1962), The Statistical Power of Abnormal-Social Psychological Research, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, s. 145-153.
Crother, I.B. (2002), Is Karl Popper 's Philosophy of Science All Things To All People, Cladistics, 18, s.445.
Davİes, E.B. (2003), The Newtonian Myth, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 34, s.763-780.
de Quetroz, K., Poe, S. (2001), Philosophy and Phylogenetic Inference: A Comparison of Likelihood and Parsimony Methods in the Context of Karl Popper's Writings on Corroboration, Syst. Biol., 50, s.305-321.
Densmore, D. (1995), Newton 's Prmcipia, The Central Argument : Translation, Notes and Expanded Proofs (W.H. Donahue Trans.), Santa Fe, NM : Green Lion Press
Fisher, R. (1935), The Design of Experiments, Edinburgh : Oliver and Boyd, s.6-7.
Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., Krüger, L. (1989), The Empire of Chance, Cambridge University Press, s.93-94, s.106-107.
Hull, L.D. (1999), The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper, Biology and Philosophy, 14, s.481-504.
Magee, B. (1982), Karl Popper 'in Bİlİm Felsefesi ve Siyaset Kuramı, Remzi Kitabevi, s. 19.
Newton-Smith, W.H. (1981), The Rationality of Science , London : Routledge and Kegan Paul, s.52.
Popper, K.R. (1972), Objective Knowledge : An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford University Press, s.145.
Popper, K.R. (1960), The Poverty of Historicism, 2d Ed., London : Routledge and Kegan Paul, s.60.
Popper, K.R. (1974), Karl Popper: Replies to My Critics, In Schilpp, s. 1192-1193.
Popper, K.R. (2003), Bilimsel Araştırmanın Mantığı, Yapı ve Kredi Yayınları, s.429, s,573.
Redman, D.A. (1993), Economics and the Philosophy of Science, Oxford University, s.32-34, s.116.
Redman , D.A. (1994) , Karl Popper's Theory of Science and Econometrics : The Rise and Decline of Social Engineering, Journal of Economic Issues, 28, s.73.
Salsburg, S.D. (2002), The Lady Tasting Tea : How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century, Owl Books, s.300.
Smith, G.E. (2001), The Newtonian Style in Book II of The Principia, In J.Z. Buchwald & I.B. Cohen (Eds.), Isaac Newton's Natural Philosophy, Cambridge MA : MIT Press, s.249-298.
Worrall, J. (2000), The Scope, Limits and Distinctiveness of The Method of Deduction From The Phenomena : Some lessons From Newton's Demonstrations in Optics, British Journal of the History of Science, 51, s.45-80.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com