TAQIYYA (DISSIMULATION) AND ITS BEING FUNDAMENTAL BELIEF IN SHI'A SECT
Journal Name:
- İstanbul Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Key Words:
Keywords (Original Language):
| Author Name | University of Author | Faculty of Author |
|---|---|---|
Abstract (2. Language):
The purpose of the article is to resarch the meaning of the taqiyah or dissimulation (a religious obligation to conceal one's true religious identity in the face of danger) and its practices by Islamic sects in the history. 1 discussed its literally meanings and practices according to the Shi'ite. I studied the blicves in taqiyah according to the other Islamic sects like Ahlus Sunnah, Hawarij and Mu'tazilah. It is appeared that the question of taqiyah was discussed among the Islamic sects in the early centuries after Muhammad had died. And it was explained that if is a part of the Shi'ite theology as a doctrine and has many writings by the virtue of taqiyah. It is enlightened thai the Sunnis' blicf in Shi'ites' taqiyah as pure hypocrisy and a lack of faith in this article. Furthermore, Hawarij declared in which there was no taqiyah as a doctrine in Islamic believes. In the end, it İs claimed that besides Islamic sources, Turkish religious tradition has no permission of taqiyah as a doctrine.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language):
Bu makalenin amacı iakiyye kelimesinin tarih içerisinde kazandığı anlamlan ve çeşitli İslam mezhepleri tarafından uygulanış şekillerini tespit etmektir. Bu nedenle Şîa, Ehl-i sünnet, Havâric ve yeri geldikçe de Mutezilenin iakiyye inançları söz konusu edilmiştir. İslam peygamberinden hemen sonra tartışma konusu haline gelen iakiyye kavramının özellikle şîa tarafından bir inanç prensibi ve doktrin haline getirilmesi şîî kaynaklardan hareketle tahlil edilmiştir. Bu arada Ehl-i sünnetin takiyyeye bakı ve onun, yalanla ilişkiİerıdirilmcsi tartışılmıştır. Bu konuda en azından başlangıçla kesin olarak olumsuz bir tavır sergileyen Haricîlerin konuyla ilgili tutumları da İncelenmiştir. Sonuçta bu davranış şeklinin Türk dini gelenek ve göreneklerine uymadığı vurgulanmıştır.
- 1
183-217