You are here

Home » Content

Bilgi yönetiminde bilgi dönüştürme ve SECI Modeli: Hizmet sektöründe bir alan araştırması

Knowledge conversion at the knowledge management and SECI Model: a field study in services sector

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The fundamental objective of this study is to explain the SECI Model as a knowledge conversation method and to set forth the effects of its four sub-dimensions over the knowledge management performance. The research has been conducted on services sector based on data collected from eight different companies in Istanbul. Two scales which measure the sub-dimensions of SECI Model and the perceptions of employee’s knowledge management performance were used. These sub-dimensions of SECI Model and the effects of dimensions on knowledge management performance were analyzed and explained. As a result of this research, the performance of workers’ on the four different aspects of knowledge conversation has been revealed. Besides, it is detected that three of these four aspects are influential on the knowledge management performance. However, the study could not figure out any meaningful relationship between the fourth dimension of SECI (which is tacit to tacit knowledge conversion) and knowledge management performance
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, bir bilgi dönüştürme modeli olan SECI Modeli’nin açıklanması ve modeli oluşturan dört alt boyutun bilgi yönetimi performansı üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Bu çalışma kapsamında gerçekleştirilen araştırma, hizmet sektöründe faaliyet gösteren sekiz farklı firmada çalışanlar arasından seçilen örneklem ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu araştırma kapsamında SECI Modeli’nin alt boyutlarını ve çalışanların bilgi yönetimi performans algılarını ölçen iki farklı ölçek kullanılmıştır. Ölçek yardımı ile elde edilen veriler kullanılarak SECI Model’inin alt boyutları ayrı ayrı analiz edilmiştir. Aynı zamanda boyutların bilgi yönetimi performansı üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilerek açıklanmıştır. Yürütülen araştırma sonucunda hizmet sektöründe çalışan iş görenlerin bilgi dönüştürmenin dört farklı boyutunda gösterdikleri performans ortaya koyulmuş; ayrıca söz konusu boyutların üç tanesinin bilgi yönetimi performansı üzerinde etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. SECI Modeli’nin alt boyutlarından biri olan bilginin birleştirilmesi boyutu ile bilgi yönetimi performansı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-bilgi-yonetiminde-bilgi-donusturme-seci-modeli-hizmet-sektorunde-bir-alan-arastirmasi.pdf
  • 1
1-12
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] A. Tiwana, Bilginin Yönetimi. çev. Günhan Günay, ed. Murat Ermert, New York:
Dışbank Kitapları, (2002).
[2] J.M.T.B. Tiago, J.P.A. Couto, F.G. Tiago and J.A.C. Vieira, Knowledge management
An Overview of European Reality. Management Research News, 30, 2, 100-114,
(2007).
[3] M.E. Porter, Competitive Advantage. The Free Press, New York, (1998).
[4] I. Goll, N.B. Johnson, A.A. Rasheed, Knowledge Capability, Strategic Change, and
Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of the Environment. Management Decision,
45, 2, 161-17, (2007).
[5] G.V. Krogh, I. Nonaka, M. Aben, Making the Most of Your Company’s Knowledge: A
Strategic Framework. Long Range Planning, 34, 421-439, (2001).
[6] M.E. Jennex, Knowledge Management in Modern Organizations. Hershey, Idea
Group Publishing, (2007).
[7] M.D. Lytras, A. Pouloudi and A. Poulymenakou, Knowledge Management
Convergence-Expanding Learning Frontiers. The Journal of Knowledge
Management, 6, 1, (2002).
[8] G.D. Bhatt, Knowledege Management in Organization: Examining The Interaction
between Technologies, Techniques, and People. The Journal of Knowledge
Management, 5, 1, (2001).
[9] M. Helao-Calad, M. P. Arango-Fonnegra, Concept Maps as a Strategy to Convert
Knowledge in Knowledge Management. The Journal of Information and Knowledge
Management Systems, 37, 1, (2007).
[10] H. Zaim, Bilginin Artan Önemi ve Bilgi Yönetimi. İstanbul, İşaret, (2005).
[11] E. Geisler, A Typology of Knowledge Management: Strategic Groups and Role
Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 1, 84-96,
(2007).
[12] T.H. Davenport, L. Prusak, Working Knowledge. Boston, Harvard Business School
Press, (1998).
[13] M. Kazemi, M.Z. Allahyari, Defining a Knowledge Management Conceptual Model by
Using MADM. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 6, 872-890, (2010).
[14] J.C.Y. Lee and M. Nissen, Accelerating Acculturation through Tacit Knowledge
Flows: Refining a Grounded Theory Model. The Journal of Information and
Knowledge Systems, 40, 3/4, 312-325, (2003).
[15] M. Stover, Making Tacit Knowledge Explicit: the Ready Reference Database as
Codified Knowledge. Reference Services Review, 32, 2, (2004).H. Zaim, G. Seçgin/ İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 41, 1, (2012) 1-12 © 2012
11
[16] Elearn, Information and Knowledge Management: Management Extra.
Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford, UK, (2005).
[17] W. Vool, Knowledge Management Repositories: Supporting Knowledge Work and
Activity in Organizations, Dissertation, Graduate School, The State University of
New Jersey, (2007).
[18] R. Lubit, The Keys to Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Organizational Dynamics,
29, 4, (2001).
[19] I. Nonaka, The Knowledge Creating Company. Harvard Business Review On
Knowledge Management, Harvard, Business School Press, U.S.A, (1998).
[20] M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension. The University of Chicago Press, London, (1966).
[21] A. Chua, Taxonomy of Organizational Knowledge. Singapore Management Review,
24, 2, (2002).
[22] N. Dixon, Common Knowledge. Harward Business School Press, Boston, (2000).
[23] C.P. Pathirage, D.G. Amaratunga and R.P. Haigh, Tacit Knowledge and
Organizational Performance: Construction Industry Perspective. Journal of
Knowledge Management, 11, 1, 115-126, (2007).
[24] T.R. Groff, T. Jones, Introduction to Knowledge Management. Burlington,
Butterworth Heinemann, (2003).
[25] T.H. Herrgard, Difficulties in Diffusion of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. Journal
of Intellectual Capital, 1, 4, 357-365, (2000).
[26] H. Soo Lee, Yung-Ho Suh, Knowledge Conversion with Information Technology of
Korean Companies. Business Process Management Journal, 9, 3, (2003).
[27] C. Bratianu, A Critical Analysis of Nonaka’s Model of Knowledge Dynamics. The
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 2, 181-266, (2010).
[28] I. Nonaka, R. Toyama and N. Konno, SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of
Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, 33, (2000).
[29] M. Glisby and N. Holden, Contextual Constraints in Knowledge Management Theory:
The Cultural Embeddedness of Nonaka’s Knowledge-creating Company. Knowledge
and Process Management, 10, 1, 29-36, (2003).
[30] W.R. King, Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. 4, New York,
Springer, 136, (2009).
[31] Y.W. Dai Senoo and R.M. Watanabe, Diagnosis for Organizational Knowledge
Creation: an Ontological Shift SECI Model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14,
6, 791-810, (2010).
[32] M. Mayfield, Tacit Knowledge Sharing: Techniques for Putting a Powerful Tool in
Practice. Development and Learning in Organizations, 24, 1, 24-26, (2010).
[33] R. Herschel, H. Nemati, D. Steiger, Tacit to Explicit Knowledge Conversion:
Knowledge Exchange Protocols. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 1, 107-115,
(2001).
[34] P. Byosiere and D.J. Luethge, Knowledge domains and knowledge conversion: an
empirical investigation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 2, 67-78, (2008).
[35] I. Nonaka, Gurus on Managing People, Thorogood. 101-110, (2004).
[36] H. Floren, Collaborative Approaches to Management Learning in Small Firms.
Journal of Workplace Learning, 15, 5, 203-216, (2003). H. Zaim, G. Seçgin/ İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 41, 1, (2012) 1-12 © 2012
12
[37] A. de Geus, The Living Company. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, (1997).
[38] H. Zaim, S. Zaim, The Impacts of Tacit Knowledge on Organizations' Performance.
6'th International Congress on Knowledge, Management and Economy, İstanbul,
Turkey, Dec. (2007).
[39] D.A. Lind, W.G. Marchal and S.A. Wathen, Statistical Techniques In Business and
Economics. McGraw – Hill Companies, Newyork, p.510-512 (2010).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com