You are here

Başarı hedef yönelimleri ve iş özelliklerinin çalışmaya tutkunluk üzerindeki katkıları

The contributions of achievement goal orientations and job characteristics on work engagement

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this research is to investigate the contributions of achievement goal orientations (mastery, performance-prove, performance-avoid) and job characteristics (skill variety and autonomy) on work engagement. The data were collected from 296 employees working in organizations functioning in the service sector. The regression analysis indicated that mastery goal orientation is a more powerful predictor of work engagement than performance-prove goal orientation. Performance-avoid goal orientation, on the other hand, was found unrelated to work engagement. The hierarchical regression analyses, applied to examine the interactional contributions of achievement goal orientations and job characteristics on work engagement, indicated that the interactions of autonomy with both mastery and performance-prove goals have significant contributions on work engagement. Skill variety, on the other hand, was found as a variable directly contributing to work engagement.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın amacı, başarı hedef yönelimleri (ustalaşma, ispatlama ve kaçınma) ile iş özelliklerinin (beceri çeşitliliği ve özerklik) çalışmaya tutkunluk üzerindeki katkılarını incelemektir. Hizmet sektöründe faaliyet gösteren kurumlarda çalışan toplam 296 kişiden elde edilen veriler, ustalaşma hedefinin çalışmaya tutkunluğu, ispatlama hedefine kıyasla daha güçlü bir şekilde açıkladığını, kaçınma hedefinin ise çalışmaya tutkunluk ile bir ilişkisinin olmadığını göstermiştir. Başarı hedefleri ile iş özellikleri arasındaki etkileşimin çalışmaya tutkunluk üzerindeki katkısını test etmeye dair yapılan hiyerarşik regresyon analizleri, özerkliğin hem ustalaşma hem de ispatlama hedefi ile etkileşime girerek çalışmaya tutkunluk puanlarında değişime katkıda bulunduğuna işaret etmiştir. Beceri çeşitliliğinin ise hiçbir başarı hedef yönelimi ile etkileşim halinde olmadığı, ancak çalışmaya tutkunluk üzerinde doğrudan pozitif katkıya sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
1-25

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] A.M. Saks, Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600-619 (2006).
[2] W.B. Schaufeli, A.B. Bakker, Job Demands, Job Resources, and Their Relationship with Burnout and Engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315 (2004).
[3] W.B. Schaufeli, A.B. Bakker, W. VanRhenen, How Changes in Job Demands and Resources Predict Burnout, Work Engagement, and Sickness Absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 893–917 (2009).
[4] A. Durán, N. Extremera, L. Rey, Self-Reported Emotional Intelligence, Burnout and Engagement Among Staff in Services for People with Intellectual Disabilities. Psychological Reports, 92, 386-390 (2004).
[5] K. Mostert, S. Rothmann, Work-Related Well-Being in the South African Police Service. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 479-491 (2006).
T. Turgut / İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 42, 1, (2013) 1-25 © 2013
22
[6] D. Xanthopoulou, A.B. Bakker, E. Demerouti, W.B. Schaufeli, The Role of Personal Resources in the Job Demands–Resources Model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121–141 (2007).
[7] D. Xanthopoulou, A.B. Bakker, E. Demerouti, W.B. Schaufeli, Work Engagement and Financial Returns: A Diary Study on the Role of Job and Personal Resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183-200 (2009).
[8] E.A. Bal, İnsan Kaynakları Alanında Yeni Bir Kavram: İşe Gönülden Adanma (Engagement) ve Türkiye’de Durum. İnsan Kaynakları ve Yönetim Dergisi, 11, 6 (2009)
[9] K. Ardıç, S. Polatçı, Tükenmişlik Sendromu ve Madalyonun Öbür Yüzü: İşle Bütünleşme. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 21-46 (2009).
[10] H.B. Ertemli, İş Aile ve Aile İş Çatışmalarının İşe Cezbolma Üzerindeki Etkisine Yönelik Bir Uygulama. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2011.
[11] W.B. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, V. González-Romá, A.B. Bakker, The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92 (2002).
[12] A.E. Bal, Self-Effıcacy, Contextual Factors and Well-Being: The Impact of Work Engagement, Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2008.
[13] J. Hakanen, A.B. Bakker, W.B. Schaufeli, Burnout and Work Engagement among Teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495–513 (2006).
[14] M. Koyuncu, R.J. Burke, L. Fiskenbaum, Work Engagement Among Women Managers and Professionals in a Turkish Bank: A Potential Antecedents and Consequences. Equal Opportunities International, 25, 299-310 (2006).
[15] Ü.B. Metin, The Antecedents and Consequences of Burnout, Work Engagement and Workaholism, Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University Graduate School of Social Sciences, 2010.
[16] K. Salmela-Aro, J.E. Nurmi, Self-Esteem During University Studies Predicts Career Characteristics 10 Years Later. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 463-477 (2007).
[17] C.S. Dweck, Motivational Process Affecting Learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048 (1986).
[18] J.G. Nicholls, Achievement Motivation: Conceptions of Ability, Subjective Experience, Task Choice, and Performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346 (1984).
[19] P.R. Pintrich, Multiple Goals, Multiple Pathways: The Role of Goal Orientation in Learning and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555 (2000).
[20] A.J. Elliot, The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116 (2006).
[21] C. Ames, Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271 (1992).
[22] A.J. Elliot, M.A. Church, A Hierarchical Model of Approach and Avoidance Achievement Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232 (1997).
T. Turgut / İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 42, 1, (2013) 1-25 © 2013
23
[23] C.M. Mueller, C.S. Dweck, Praise for Intelligence can Undermine Children’s Motivation and Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52 (1998).
[24] D. VandeWalle, Development and Validation of a Work Domain Goal Orientation Instrument. Eduacational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015 (1997).
[25] A.H. DeLange, N.W. VanYperen, B.I.J.M. VanDerHeijden, P.M. Bal, Dominant Achievement Goals of Older Workers and Their Relationship with Motivation-Related Outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 118-125 (2010).
[26] A.J. Elliot, K. Murayama, On the Measurement of Achievement Goals: Critique, Illustration, and Application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628 (2008).
[27] J.M. Harackiewicz, K.E. Barron, P.R. Pintrich, A.J. Elliot, T.M. Thrash, Revision of Achievement Goal Theory: Necessary and Illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645 (2002).
[28] O. Janssen, N.W. VanYperen, Employees’ Goal Orientations, the Quality of Leader-Member Exchange, and the Outcomes of Job Performance and Job Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 368–384 (2004).
[29] N.W. VanYperen, A Novel Approach to Assessing Achievement Goals in the Context of the 2x2 Framework: Identifying Distinct Profiles of Individuals with Different Dominant Achievement Goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1432–1445 (2006).
[30] M.A. Church, A.J. Elliot, S.L. Gable, Perceptions of Classroom Environment, Achievement Goals, and Achievement Outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43–54 (2001).
[31] N.W. VanYperen, O. Janssen, Fatigued and Dissatisfied or Fatigued but Satisfied? Goal Orientations and Responses to High Job Demands. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1161-1171 (2002).
[32] D. VandeWalle, S.P. Brown, W.L. Cron, J.W.J. Slocum, The Influence of Goal Orientation and Self-Regulation Tactics on Sales Performance: A Longitudinal Field Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 249–259 (1999).
[33] K.E. Barron, J.M. Harackiewicz, Achievement Goals and Optimal Motivation: Testing Multiple Goal Models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706-722 (2001).
[34] A.J. Elliot, H.A. McGregor, S. Gable, Achievement Goals, Study Strategies, and Exam Performance: A Mediational Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549–563 (1999).
[35] C.A. Wolters, Advancing Achievement Goals Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students’ Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250 (2004).
[36] J.L. Meece, P.J. Blumenfeld, R.H. Hoyle, Students' Goal Orientations and Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-23 (1988).
[37] A.J. Elliot, Approach and Avoidance Motivation and Achievement Goal. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189 (1999).
T. Turgut / İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 42, 1, (2013) 1-25 © 2013
24
[38] S.J. Finney, S.L. Pieper, K.E. Barron, Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a General Academic Context. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 365–382 (2004).
[39] A.J. Elliot, H.A. McGregor, A 2×2 Achievement Goal Framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501−519 (2001).
[40] C.L. Porath, W.S. Bateman, Self-Regulation: From Goal Orientation to Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 185−192 (2006).
[41] J.R. Hackman, G.R. Oldham, Work Redesign, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980, 78-114.
[42] J. Hakanen, A.B. Bakker, E. Demerouti, How Dentists Cope With Their Job Demands and Stay Engaged: The Moderating Role of Job Resources. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 113, 479-487 (2005).
[43] A. Bakker, E. Demerouti, The Job Demands-Resources Model: State of the Art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-328 (2007).
[44] R.M. Ryan, E.L. Deci, Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78 (2000).
[45] J.L. Farr, D.A. Hoffman, K.L. Ringenbach, Goal Orientation and Action Control Theory: Implications for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 193–232 (1993).
[46] T.F. Meijman, G. Mulder, “Psychological Aspects of Workload”, in P.J.D. Drenth, H. Thierry (Ed.), Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol.2: Work Psychology, Psychology Press, Hove, 1998, 5–33.
[47] F. Eyi, Critical Thinking as a Mediator Between Job Resources and Goal Achievement, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2010.
[48] W.B. Schaufeli, A.B. Bakker, M. Salanova, The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716 (2006).
[49] T. Turgut, Çalışmaya Tutkunluk: İş Yükü, Esnek Çalışma Saatleri, Yönetici Desteği ve İş-Aile Çatışması ile İlişkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25, 155-179 (2011).
[50] J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, W.C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1998, 99.
[51] S.B. Button, J.E. Mathieu, D.M. Zajac, Goal Orientation in Organizational Research: A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 26–48 (1996).
[52] N.W. VanYperen, The Perceived Profile of Goal Orientation within Firms: Differences Between Employees Working for Successful and Unsuccessful Firms Employing Either Performance-Based Pay or Job-Based Pay. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 229-243 (2003).
[53] N.W. VanYperen, L.J. Renkema, Performing Great and the Purpose of Performing Better than Others: on the Recursiveness of the Achievement Goal Adoption Process. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 260−271 (2008).
[54] D. VandeWalle, Why Wanting to Look Successful Doesn’t Always Lead to Success. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 162-171 (2001).
T. Turgut / İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 42, 1, (2013) 1-25 © 2013
25
[55] B.M. Bass, Leadership: Good, Better, Best. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 26-40 (1985).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com