İKTİSAT DÜŞÜNCESİNDE KADININ KONUMU VE FEMİNİST İKTİSAT

Ömer EROĞLU; Ruhan İŞLER

Journal Name:

İstanbul Üniversitesi Maliye Araştırma Merkezi Konferansları Dergisi

Publication Year:

2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name	University of Author	Faculty of Author
Ömer EROĞLU	Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi	İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
Ruhan İŞLER	Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi	Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü

Abstract (2. Language):

The aim of this study is to evaluate the criticism and suggestions of Feminist Economics on the understanding of the main-stream economics. The goal of feminist economists is not to form a female dominated economics theory. Their major aim is not to review the woman in economy but to review the economics involving woman‟s perspective. Feminist economists are of the opinion that the main-stream economic knowledge is based on gender discrimination and interested in male characteristics. Also, they claim that womens‟ experiences are not reflected in economics. They assume the possibility of knowledge application involving both male and female positive qualities to be more flawless, and think it compulsory to develop scientific methods including rationality, objectivity, universality as well as emotions, subjectivity and locality. However, from epistemological point of view, feminist analysis is devoid of the basis for a societal change.

Bookmark/Search this post with

Tweet Widget

Abstract (Original Language):

Bu çalışmanın amacı, „Feminist İktisat‟ın ana-akım iktisat anlayışına getirdiği eleştiri ve önerileri değerlendirmektir. Feminist iktisatçılar, kadın egemen bir iktisat teorisi oluşturmak peşinde değildirler. „Ekonomide kadın‟ı değil, kadın bakış açısını da içerecek bir biçimde ekonomiyi yeniden gözden geçirmek ve sorgulamak amacındadırlar. Ana-akım iktisadi bilginin kavramsal temellerinin toplumsal cinsiyet ayrımına dayandığını ve eril niteliklerin dikkate alındığını, kadın deneyimlerinin iktisat bilimine yansımadığını iddia eden feminist iktisatçılar, hem eril, hem dişil pozitif niteliklerin içerileceği bir bilim uygulamasının daha kusursuz olacağını varsayarak; akıl, nesnellik ve evrensellik yanı sıra, duygu, öznellik, ve yerelliği de kapsayan uygun bilimsel yöntemlerin geliştirilmesini zorunlu görmektedirler. Bununla birlikte feminist analizin, şimdilik epistemolojik açıdan toplumsal bir değişimi temellendirmekten yoksun olduğunu söylemek mümkündür.

FULL TEXT (PDF):

arastrmx_140013_46_pp_53-81.pdf

1

53-81

Turkish

REFERENCES

References:

Aslanbeigui, N. ve G. Summerfield, “The Asian Crisis, Gender and The Internatıonal Financial Archıtecture,” Feminist Economics, 6(3), s.81-103, 2000.
Bakker, I., (ed.), The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy, London, Zed Books, 1994‟den aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
Beneria, L., Globalization, Gender and The Davos Man. Feminist Economics, 5(3), s.61-83, 1999.
Beneria, L., M. Floro, C. Grown ve M. MacDonald, “Introduction Globalization and Gender,” Feminist Economics, 6(3), s.7-17, 2000.
Bergeron, S., Political Economy Discourses of Globalization and Feminist Politics. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26(4), s.983-1007, Summer 2001.
Bergmann, B. R., “ „Measurement‟ or Finding Things Out in Economics,” Journal of Economic Education, 18(2), s.191-203, 1987‟den aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
Bergmann, B. R, “What is Feminist Economics all about?” Challenge, s.4-8, January-February 1996
Berik, G., “Mature Export-Led Growth and Gender Wage inequality in Taiwan,” Feminist Economics, 6(3), s.1-26, 2000.
Blank, R. M., “What Should Mainstream Economists Learn From Feminist Theory?” içinde Beyond Economic Man – Feminist Theory and Economics, M. A. Ferber ve J. A. Nelson (der.), Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, s.133-143, 1993.
Bodkin, R. G., “Women‟s Agency in Classıcal Economıc Thought: Adam Smith, Harriet Taylor Mill, and J. S. Mıll,” Feminist Economics, 5(1), s.45-60, 1999.Carr, M., M. A. Chen, ve J. Tate, “Globalization and Home-Based Workers,” Feminist Economics, 6(3), s.123-142, 2000.
Demir, Ö., İktisat ve Yöntem, İz Yayınclılık, İstanbul, 318s., 1995.
Demir, Ö., “Feminizm ve İktisat,” içinde İktisatta Yöntem Tartışmaları, Ö. Demir (der.), Vadi Yayınları, Ankara, s.51-73, 1996.
Dollar, D. ve R. Gatti, “Gender Inequality, Income and Growth: Are Good Times Good for Women?” Policy Research Report on Gender and Development, Working Paper Series No. 1, Washington DC: World Bank, May 1999‟den aktaran L. Beneria, M. Floro, C. Grown ve M. MacDonald., “Introduction Globalization ve Gender,” Feminist Economics, 6(3), s.xıı-xvıı, 2000.
Donath, S., “The Other Economy: A Suggestıon For a Distinctively Feminist Economics,” Feminist Economics, 6(1), s.115-123, 2000.
England, P., “The Separative Self: Androcentric Bias in Neoclassical Assumptions” içinde Beyond Economic Man – Feminist Theory and Economics, M. A. Ferber ve J. A. Nelson, (der.) Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, s.37-53., 1993.
Ferber, M. A. ve J. A. Nelson, Beyond Economic Man – Feminist Theory and Economics, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, s.1-22, 1993.
Folbre, N., “Domesticate the Gross Product,” Dollars and Sense, 192, 7 , March / April 1994‟den aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
Forget, E. L., “The Market For Virtue: Jean- Baptiste Say On Women in The Economy and Society,” Feminist Economics, 3(1), s.95-111, 1997.
Frank, R. H, Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of Emotions, New York, W. W. Norton, 1988‟den aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
Frazer, W. J., “Methodology: Reply,” Journal of Economic Literature, 74(4), 793-794, 1984‟den aktaran Ö. Demir, İktisat ve Yöntem, İz Yayınclılık, İstanbul, 318s., 1995.
Harding, S., “Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective?,” Feminist Economics, 1(1), 1995‟den aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
Heilbroner, R., “Economics as Universal Science,” Social Research, 58(2), s.457-474, 1991.
Jennings, A. L., “Public or Private? Institutional Economics and Feminism,” içinde Beyond Economic Man – Feminist Theory and Economics, M. A. Ferber ve J. A. Nelson, (der.) Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, s.111-129, 1993.
Jennings, A. and W. Waller, “Constructions of Social Hierarchy: The Family, Gender, and Power,” Journal of Economic Issues, 24(2), s.623-631, June 1990.
Kuiper, E. ve Sap, J., Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economic Theory, New york, Routledge, 1995.
Longino, H. E., “Economics for Whom?” içinde Beyond Economic Man – Feminist Theory and Economics, M. A. Ferber ve J. A. Nelson, (der.) Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, s.158-168, 1993.
MacDonald, M., “The Emprical Challenges of Feminist Ecnomics,” içinde Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economic Theory, E. Kuiper ve J. Sap, (der.) New york, Routledge, 175-197, 1995.Mayer, T., Truth us. Precision in Economics, Brookfield, Vt., Edward Elgar, 1993‟ten aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
McCloskey, D. N., “Some Consequences of a Conjective Economics,” içinde Beyond Economic Man – Feminist Theory and Economics, M. A. Ferber ve J. A. Nelson (der.), Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, s.69-93, 1993.
Nelson, J. A., “The Study of Choice or the Study of Provisioning? Gender and the Definition of Economics,” içinde Beyond Economic Man – Feminist Theory and Economics, M. A. Ferber ve J. A. Nelson, (der.) Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, s.23-36, 1993.
Nelson, J. A., “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
Nelson, J. A., Feminism, Objectivity and Economic, New York, Routledge, 174s., 1996.
Persky, J., “Retrospectives: The Ethology of Economicus,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), s.221-231, Spring 1995.
Pollak, R. A., “For Better orWorse:The Roles of Power in Models of Distribution within Marriage,” Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, May 1994, The American Economic Review, 84(2), s.148-152, 1994.
Pujol, M. A., “İnto the Margin,” içinde Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economic Theory, E. Kuiper ve J. Sap (der.), New york, Routledge, s.17-34, 1995.
Pujol, M. A., Feminism and Anti-feminism in Early Economic Thought, Aldershot, U.K. Elgar, 1992.
Rosenberg, A., Microeconomic Laws. University of Pittsburg Press, 1976‟dan aktaran, Ö. Demir, İktisat ve Yöntem, İz Yayınclılık, İstanbul, 318s., 1995.
Seguino, S., “Accounting for Gender in Asıan Economic Growth,” Feminist Economics, 6(3), s.27-58, 2000.
Sen, A., “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317-344, Summer 1977‟den aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
Sen, A., “Women, Technology, and Sexual Divisions,” In United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Trade and Development: An UNCTAD Review, 6, 195-223, 1985‟den aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
Serdaroğlu, U., Feminist İktisat’ın Bakışı, Sarmal Yayınevi, İstanbul, 128s.
Steans, J., “The Private is Global: Feminist Politics and Global Political Economy,” New Political Economy, 4(1), s.113-139, 1999.
Strassmann, D. L., “Creating a Forum for Feminist Inquiry,” Feminist Economics, 1(1), Spring 1995.
Strassmann, D. L., “Feminist Thought and Economıcs; Or What do the Visigoths Know,” The Amerikan Economic Review, 84(2), s.153-158, May1994.
Strober, M. H., “The Scobe of Microeconomics: İmplications for Economic Education,” Journal of Economic Education, 18(2), s.135-149, Spring 1987‟den aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.Strober, M. H., “Rethinking Economics Through a Feminist Lens,” Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic, The American Economic Review, 84(2), 1994.
Summers, L. H., “The Scientific Illusion in Emprical Macroeconomics,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93(1), 129-148, 1991‟den aktaran J. A. Nelson, “Feminism and Economics,” The Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(2), s.131-148, Spring 1995.
Tıckner, J. A., “States and Markets: An Ecofeminist Perspective on International Political Economy,” International Political Science Review, 14(1), s.59-69, 1993.
Waller, W. ve A. Jennings, “On the Possibility of a Feminist Economics: The Convergence of İnstitutional and Feminist Methodology,” Journal of Economic Issues, 24(2), s.613-622, June 1990.
Williams, R. M., “Race, Deconstruction and the Emergent Agenda of Feminist Economic Theory,” içinde Beyond Economic Man – Feminist Theory and Economics, M. A. Ferber ve J. A. Nelson, (der.) Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 144-153, 1993.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com

Tweet Widget

You are here

İKTİSAT DÜŞÜNCESİNDE KADININ KONUMU VE FEMİNİST İKTİSAT

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Feminizm

Toplumsal Cinsiyet

Ana-akım İktisat

Feminist İktisat.

REFERENCES

Recommended Articles

You are here

İKTİSAT DÜŞÜNCESİNDE KADININ KONUMU VE FEMİNİST İKTİSAT

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Feminizm

Toplumsal Cinsiyet

Ana-akım İktisat

Feminist İktisat.

REFERENCES

Login

Recommended Articles