You are here

Home » Content

DEĞİŞİM BELİRLEMEDE GÖRÜNTÜ FARKI VE GÖRÜNTÜ ORANLAMA YÖNTEMLERİ

IMAGE DIFFERENCING AND IMAGE RATIONING METHODS FOR CHANGE DETECTION

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In change detection mentioned as the process of identifying differences in the state of an object or phenomenon by observing it at different times, satellite data, aerial photographs or ground measurements can be used alone or jointly. Recently, satellite data obtained digitally and short intervals have been used very often. There are many techniques in the literature for change detection process which is performed with analyzing two or multiple temporal satellite datasets. In this paper, planning of change detection study, choosing of satellite data and preprocessing of change detection were explained. Furthermore, image differencing and image rationing methods that used in change detection were also explained.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Farklı zamanlarda gözlemlenen olay ya da objelerin durumlarındaki farklılıkların tanımlanması işlemi olarak ifade edilen değişim belirlemede yersel ölçmeler, hava fotoğrafları veya uydu görüntüleri yalnız veya kombine olarak kullanılabilmektedir. Son yıllarda bu tür çalışmalarda kısa aralıklarla ve sayısal olarak elde edilebilen uydu verileri sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. İki veya daha çok zamanlı uydu verilerinin analizi ile yapılan değişim belirleme işlemi için literatürde birçok teknik bulunmaktadır. Uydu verilerindeki gelişmeye paralel olarak yeni teknikler de geliştirilmektedir. Bu makalede değişim belirleme çalışmasının planlanması, uydu verilerinin seçimi ve değişim belirleme öncesi işlem adımları açıklanmıştır. Ayrıca uydu verileriyle yapılan değişim belirleme çalışmalannda sıklıkla kullanılan görüntü farkı ve görüntü oranlama yöntemleri açıklanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-degisim-belirlemede-goruntu-farki-goruntu-oranlama-yontemleri.pdf
  • 1
25-32
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ASTER, 2005 : Aster instrument characteristics, http://asterweb.ipl.nasa.gov/characteristics.asp (Son erişim tarihi : 22.09.2005).
CIVCO, D.L., 1989: Topographic normalization of Landsat thematic mapper digital imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55:9, pp. 1303-1309.
COLBY, J.D., 1991: Topographic Normalization in rugged terrain, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57:5, pp. 531 -537.
COPPIN, P.; JONCKHEERE, I.; NACKAERTS, K.; MUYS, B., 2004: Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 25:9, pp. 1565-1596.
DWIVEDI, R.S.; SREENIVAS, K., 1998: Image transform as a tool for he study of soil salinity and alkalinity dynamics, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 19:4, pp. 605-619.
EKLUNDH, L.; SINGH, A., 1993: A comparative analysis of standardized and unstandardized principal components analysis in remote sensing, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 14:7, pp. 1359-1370.
EKSTRAND, S., 1994: Assessment of forest damage with Landsat TM: correction for varying forest stand characteristics, Remote Sensing of Environment, 47, pp. 291-302.
ERDAS, 2002: Erdas Field Guide, Sixth edition, Leica Geosystems GIS&Map Division, USA.
FUNG, T.; SIU, W., 2000: Environmental quality and its changes, an analysis using NDVI, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 21:5, pp. 1011-1024.
GUIRGUIS, S.K.; HASSAN, H.M.; EL-RAEY, M.E.; HUSSAIN, M.M.A., 1996: Multi-temporal change of Lake Brullus, Egypt, from 1983 to 1991, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 17:15, pp. 2915-2921.
JENSEN, F.R.; RUTCHEY, K.; KOCH, M.S.; NARUMALANI, S., 1995: Inland wetland change detection in the everglades water conservation arca 2A using a time series of normalized remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61:2, pp 199-209.
JENSEN, J.R., 1996: Introductory digital image processing, Prentice-Hall Series in Geographic Information Science, ISBN:0-13-205840-5, USA, 316 p.
JHA, C.S.; UNNİ, N.V.M., 1994: Digital change detection of forest conversion of a dry tropical Indian forest region, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 15:13, pp. 2543-2552.
KOÇ, A., 1997: Belgrad ormanındaki ağaç türü ve karışımlarının uydu verileri ve görüntü işleme teknikleri ile belirlenmesi, İ.Ü.Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Seri A, Cilt 47, Sayı 1, pp. 89-110.
LANDSAT,
200
5 : Landsat 7 Science Data Users Handbook, http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/ IAS/ handbook/handbook htmls/chapter8/chapter8.html. (Son erişim tarihi : 22.09.2005).
LILLESAND, T.M.;
KIEFER
, R.W., 1999: Remote sensing and image interpretation, Fourth edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, 724 p.
LU D.;
MAUSEL
, P.; BRONDIZIO, E.; MORAN, E„ 2004: Change detection techniques, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 25:12, pp. 2365-2407.
MAS, J.F., 1999: Monitoring land-cover changes: a comparison of change detection techniques, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 20:1, pp. 139-152.
MAUSEL, D.L.; BRONDIZIO, E.; MORAN, E., 2002: Assessment of atmospheric correction methods for Landsat TM data applicable to Amazon basin LBA research, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 23:13, pp. 2651-2671.MEYER, P.; İTTEN K.I.; KELLENBERG, T.; SANDMEIER, S., SANDMEIER R., 1993: Radiometric corrections of topographically induced effects on Landsat TM data in an alpine environment, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 48:4, pp. 17-28.
MOHAMMAD, M.R.; EL-SOBKY, H.; SEDEIK, K.; EL RAEY M., 2001. Application of band ratios identified by HHRR for recognition of surface units using TM data in Siwa depression, Western Desert, Egypt, 22nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 5-9 November 2001, Singapore.
MUCHONEY, D.M.; HAACK, B.N., 1994: Change detection for monitoring forest defoliation, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60:10, pp. 1243-1251.
PETIT, C; SCUDDER, T.; LAMBIN, E., 2001: Quantifying processes of land-cover change by remote sensing: resettlement and rapid land-cover changes in South-eastern Zambia, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 22:17, pp. 3435-3456.
PRICE, K.P., PYKE, D.A., MENDES, L., 1992: Shrub dieback in a semiarid ecosystem: the integration of remote sensing and geographic information systems for detecting vegetation change, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58:4, pp. 455-463.
RICHARDS, J.A.; JIA, X., 1999: Remote sensing digital image analysis, An introduction third revised and enlarged edition, Springer-Verlag, Germany, 363 p.
SADER, S.A.; HAYES, D.J.; HEPINSTALL, J.A.; COAN, M.; SOZA, C, 2001: Forest change monitoring of a remote biosphere reserve, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 22:10, pp. 1937-1950.
SAKSA, T.;
UUTTERA
, J.; KOLSTRÖM, T.; LEHIKOINEN, M.; PEKKARINEN, A.; SARVI, V., 2003: Clear-cut detection in boreal forest aided by remote sensing, Scand. J. For. Res., 18, pp. 537-546.
SINGH, A., 1989: Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 10:6, pp. 989-1003.
SONG, C; WOODCOOK, C.E.; SETO, K.C.; LENNEY, M.P.; MACOMBER, S.A., 2001: Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and How to correct atmospheric effect?, Remote Sensing Environment, 75, pp. 230-244.
SUNAR,
F.
, 1998: An analysis of changes in a multi-date data set: a case study in the ikitelli area, Istanbul, Turkey, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 19:2, pp. 225-235.
TEILLET, P.M., 1986: Image correction for radiometric effects in remote sensing, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 7:12, pp. 1637-1651.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com