You are here

Ağaç Ürünleri Dayanıklılık Değerlendirilmesi Performans Kriterleri İhtiyacı

The Need for Performance Criteria in Evaluating the Durability of Wood Products

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Data generated from wood-product durability evaluations can be difficult to interpret. Standard methods used to evaluate the potential long-term durability of wood products often provide little guidance on interpretation of test results. Decisions on acceptable performance for standardization and code compliance are based on the judgment of reviewers or committees. This decision-making process has potential pitfalls, especially when there is pressure to minimize the time needed for evaluation. This paper discusses some of the pitfalls encountered in interpretation of in-ground and above-ground durability test data and suggests areas where more prescriptive performance criteria may be warranted.
29-41

REFERENCES

References: 

Augusta, U. and A, O. Rapp, 2003. The natural durability of wood in different use classes, part I. Document No. IRG/WP 03-10457. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Stockholm, Sweden.
AWPA. 2007. Book of Standards. American Wood Protection Association, Birmingham, AL.
AWPC. 1997. Australasian Wood Preservation Committee. Protocols for Assessment of Wood Preservatives. 24 pp.
Blom, A. and M. Bergstrom, 2006. Untreated Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies ) wood-panels exposed out of ground contact in Sweden for two years. Hoh als Roh- unci Werkstoff. 64: 53-61.
Brischke, C. and A.O. Rapp, 2007. A roadmap for performance-based specification of wood components based on service life prediction. Document No. IRG/WP 07¬20351. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Stockholm, Sweden.
CEN (1993) EN 330, Wood preservatives - Field test method for determining the relative protective effectiveness of a wood preservative exposed out of ground contact: L-joint method. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
CEN (1996) ENV 12037, Wood preservatives - Field test method for determining the relative protective effectiveness of a wood preservative exposed out of ground contact - Horizontal Lap-joint method. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
CEN (1998) EN 252, Field test method for determining the relative protective
effectiveness of a wood preservative in ground contact. European Committee for
Standardization, Brussels. Clausen, C.A., T.L. Highley, and D.L. Lindner, 2006. Early detection and
progression of decay in L-joints and lap-joints in a moderate decay hazard zone.
Forest Products Journal. 56 (11 /12): 100-106. Clemons, CM. and R.E. Ibach. 2004. Effects of processing method and moisture
history on laboratory fungal resistance of wood-HDPE composites. Forest
Products Journal. 54 (4): 50-57. De Groot, R.C. and J.W. Evans, 1998. Patterns of long-term performance - how well
are they predicted from accelerated tests and should evaluations consider
parameters other than averages? Document No. IRG/WP/98-20130. International
Research Group on Wood Preservation, Stockholm, Sweden. De Groot, R.C. and J.W. Evans, 1999. Does more preservative mean a better product?
Forest Products Journal. 44 (9): 59-68. De Groot, R.C. and T.L. Highley, 1995. Forest Products Laboratory methodology for
monitoring decay in wood exposed above ground. Document No. IRG/WP/95-
20074. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Stockholm,
Sweden.
Edlund, M.L., F. Evans and K. Henriksen, 2006. Testing durability of treated wood according to EN 252: Interpretation of data from Nordic test fields. NT Technical Report, TR 591. Nordic Innovation Center, Oslo, Norway.Eslyn, W.E T.L. Highley, and F.F. Lombard, 1985. Longevity of untreated wood in
use above ground. Forest Products Journal. 35 (5): 28-35. Highley, T.L., 1995. Comparative durability of untreated wood in use above ground
International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 4 (3)- 409-419 Laks, P.E and G.M. Larkin, 2007. Enhancing composite durability: understanding the
implications and limitations of test methods. In Wood Protection 2006
Proceedings, Forest Products Society meeting, March 21-23, 2006, New Orleans'
Lebow S.T andI T.L. Highley, 2008. Chapter 6. Regional biodeterioration hazards in the United States. IN "Development of Commercial Wood Preservatives-Efficacy, Environmental and Health Issues. Systems", T. Shultz H Miltz M' Freeman, B. Goodell and D. Nicholas, eds. ACS Symposium Series 982' American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
Lindegaard, B. and N. Morsing, 2003. Natural durability of European wood species tor exterior use above ground. Document No. IRG/WP 03-10499 International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Stockholm, Sweden
L.nk, C.L and R. C. De Groot, 1989. Statistical issues in evaluation of stake tests Proceedings, American Wood-Preservers'Association 85- 179-185
Militz, H., M. Broertjes and C. J. Bloom, 1998. Moisture content development in lap-jomts of different wood species in outside exposure trials. Document No IRG/WP 98-20143. International Research Group on Wood Preservation Stockholm, Sweden.
Rapp A O, L. Augusta and K. Brandt, 2006. The natural durability of wood in different use classes, part II. Document No. IRG/WP 06-10598. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Stockholm, Sweden
Van Acker, J. and M. Stevens, 2003. Biologic durability of wood in relation to end-use- Part 2: The use of an accelerated outdoor L-joint performance test. Hoh als Roh-und Werkstoff. 61: 125-132.
Wang, W. and J. J. Morrell, 2004. Water sorption characteristics of two wood-plastic composites. Forest Products Journal. 54 (12): 209-212.
Zahora, A, 2002. Field testing aboveground. IN: Enhancing the Durability of Lumber and Engineered Wood Products. Proceedings, Forest Products Society meeting February 11-13, 2002, Kissimmee, FL., USA

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com