You are here

Home » Content

CAM TAVAN SORUNUNUN TESPITINDE NITEL UNSURLARIN ÖNEMI: IMK B100 ENDEKSI ŞİRKETLERI ÜZERINE BIR ÇALŞMA

The Impor tance of Quantitative Factors at Identifying GlassCeiling Problem: A Study on ISE100 Index Firms

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Discrimination that women face in advanc ing up the job ladder into high level management positions is called the glass ceiling. Calculating the ratio of women on firm boards is one of the methods used to identify the presence of gender discrimination and glass ceiling. The study argues that using only quantitative methods to identify the magnitude of glass ceiling problem can be misleading and qualitative factors should be taken into account to make better judgments about the issue. In this context ISE100 firms are studied and us ing qualitative factors such as legal system, ownership concentration and social culture proved to be important determinants of the glass ceiling problem. The study also proposes recommendations for future studies on the topic.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kadinlarin üst yönetim pozisyonlarina gelmeleri asamasinda karsilastiklari engelleri belirten kavrama “Cam Tavan” denilmektedir. Yönetim kurullarindaki kadin üyelerin orani cins iyet ayirimciligi ve cam tavan sorununun boyutlarinin tespitinde kullanilan yöntemlerdendir. Çalismada cam tavan sorunun tespitinde sadece nicel (sayisal) yöntemlere dayanarak ulasilacak sonuçlarin yaniltici olacagini, saglikli degerlendirme yapabilmek iç in her ülkenin kendine özgü niteliklerinin de dikkate alinmasi gerektigini savunulmaktadir. Bu savi desteklemek iç in IMKB100 sirketleri incelenmis, nicel bulgularin degerlendirme yapmak için yeters izligi ortaya konmus, Türkiye’de cam tavan sorunun boyutlarini etkileyen, hukuk sistemi, mülkiyet yogunlasmasi ve toplum kültürü gibi nitel özellikler açiklanmistir. Çalisma gelecekte konuyla ilgili yapilacak arastirmalar için önerilere de yer vermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cam-tavan-sorununun-tespitinde-nitel-unsurlarin-onemi-imk-b100-endeksi-sirketleri-uzerine-bir-calsma.pdf
  • 43
97-108
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ATHEY Susan, Christopher Avery, and Peter Zemksy “Mentoring and
diversity.” 90(4), 2000, pp. 765-786.
BERTRAND Marianne and Kevin F. Hallock (2001), “The Gender Gap in
Top Corporate Jobs,” , 55: 2001,
pp. 3-21.
Birlesmis Milletler, Kadina Karsi Her Türlü Ayrimciligin Önlenmesi
Sözlesmesi (CEDAW) Türkiye Gölge Raporu, Ocak 2005.
Birlesmis Milletler Kalkinma Programi – Türkiye,
http://www.undp.org.tr/Gozlem3.aspx?WebSayfaNo=2202, (05.02. 2010).
BREMMER Charles, ”France aims to shatter glass ceiling for womwn
executives,” http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/ news/ world/
europe/article6995911.ece, (21.01.2010).
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women,
Responses to the list of issues and questions for consideration of the
combined fourth and fifth periodic reports Turkey, January 2005
DULEEP, Harriet Orcutt, and Seth Sanders “Discrimination at the top:
American-born asian and white men” , 31(3), 1992,
pp. 416-432.
Heidrick & Struggles, “Boards in Turbulent Times” Corporate Governance
Report 2009.
Heidrick & Struggles, “Boards in Turbulent Times” Corporate Governance
Report 2009 Turkey – Supplement to European Report.
HOFSTEDE, Geert, http://www.geert-hofstede.com/hofstede_turkey.shtml,
(14.02.2010).
HU Ting and Myeong- Su Yun, “Is the Glass Ceiling Craking? A Simple
Test” IZA Discussion Paper No. 3518, May 2008, pp. 1-20.
JENSEN, Michael. C., “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the
Failure of Internal Control Systems”
, Vol. VI, No: 4, 1994, pp. 4-23.
KORAY Meryem, , Ezgi Kitabevi, Bursa 2000, s. 212-219.
La PORTA, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer,
“Corporate Ownership Around the World,” Vol.
LIV, No: 2, April 1999, pp. 471-517.
La PORTA, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, Robert
Vishny, “Law and Finance,” , Vol CVI,
No: 6, December 1998, pp. 1113-1155.
LEHN K. Sukesh Patro, Mengxin Zhao, “Determinants of the Size and the
Structure of Corporate Boards: 1935–2000,”
, November 2003, http://ssrn.com/abstract=470675 or
doi:10.2139/ssrn.470675 (18.09.2004).
MATEOS de CABO Ruth, Gimeno, Ricardo and Escot, Lorenzo,
Disentangling Discrimination on Spanish Boards of Directors 2007,
, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1099902.
(20.02.2010).
McDOWELL, John M., Jr. Larry D. Singell, and Japes P. Ziliak “Cracks in
the glass ceiling: Gender and promotion in the economics profession”
89(2), 1999, pp. 392-396.
MORCK R., D. Wolfenzon, B. Yeung, “Corporate Governance, Economic
Entrenchment and Growth,” ,
Working Paper No: 10692, http://www.nber.org/papers/w10692,
(05.06.2009).
OECD, Corporate Governance in Turkey: A Pilot Study, 2003.
POWELL G, A. Butterfield, “Investigating the “glass ceiling”
Phenomenon: An Empirical Study of Actual Promotions to Top
Management,” , 37; 1994, pp. 68-86.

Journal of Applied Corporate
Finance
Sosyal Politika
The Journal of Finance,
The Journal of Polit ical Economy
Social Science Research
Network
Social
SciencesResearch Network
Amer ican Economic Review,
National Bureu of Economic Research
Academy of Management Journal

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com