You are here

Home » Content

TÜRK SİYASİ PARTİLERİNDE LİDER OLİGARŞİSİ: EVRİMİ, KURUMSALLAŞMASI VE SONUÇLARI

The Evolution, the Institutionalization and the Consequences of Leadership Oligarchy in Turkish Political Parties

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Turkish political parties display an oligarchic leadership structure and experience difficulty in changing leaders. In addition to state directed modernization producing a legacy of single party rule which Turkish democracy has inherited and the powerful central state as a model, the prevalence of clientelistic relations and the evolution of a culture supportive of leadership oligarchy have all contributed to leadership oligarchy. The oligarchic tendencies continue to be supported by the continuation of extensive clientelistic relations and the construction of a legal framework that supports it. The organizational structure of parties, their methods of candidate designation for public office and many other factors lend support to the continuation of leadership oligarchy. Oligarchic leadership structure is dysfunctional for the well-functioning of a democratic system.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Türk siyasi partilerinin liderlik yapısı oligarşiktir, lider yenilemekte zorluklarla karşılaşmaktadırlar. Lider oligarşisinin şekillenmesinde tek parti mirası, merkezi devlet yapısı gibi devlet önderliğinde modernleşme sürecinin yanında siyasette himaye ilişkilerinin yaygınlığı, lider egemenliğini destekleyen kültür ve benzer unsurlar yer almaktadır. Oligarşik liderlik devam eden himaye ilişkileri aracılığıyla gücünü korumuş, kendisini destekleyecek bir hukuk yapısı da oluşturmayı başarmıştır. Partilerin örgüt yapısı, aday belirleme yöntemleri ve çok sayıda diğer faktör lider oligarşisini desteklemektedir. Yapı, demokrasinin işleyişini zorlaştırmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_274_pp_1-21.pdf
  • 45
1-21
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

• Acar, Feride (1991), “The True Path Party,” Metin Heper ve Jacob Landau, derl.,
Political Parties and Democracy in Turkey. Londra: I. B. Tauris.
• Atatürk, Kemal (1951), Nutuk, cilt. 1. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
• Bektaş, Arsev (1993) Demokratikleşme Sürecinde Liderler Oligarşisi: CHP ve AP
(1961-1980). İstanbul: Bağlam.
• Erdem, Tarhan ve Nejat Uyguner (1994), CHP Üye Kayıtlarını Merkezde Toplama
Projesi, 1978. İstanbul.
• Gillespie, Richard (1994), “The Resurgence of Factionalism in the Spanish Socialist
20 İlter TURAN
Workers’ Party,” David S. Bell ve Eric Shaw, derl., Conflict and Cohesion in Western
Social Democratic Parties. Londra: Pinter.
• Güneş-Ayata, Ayşe (tarihsiz) Kasaba’da Politika ve Politikacı (basılmamış tebliğ)
• ______________ (1994) “Roots and Trends in Clientelism in Turkey,” Luis Roniger
ve Ayşe Güneş-Ayata, derl., Democracy, Clientelism and Civil Society. Boulder,
Lynne Rienner.
• Koçak, Cemil (1986). Türkiye’de Milli Şef Dönemi, 1938-1945. İstanbul, Yurt Yayınları.
• Michels, Robert (1962) Political Parties. New York, Free Press.
• Nadi, Yunus (1964) Perde Aralığından. İstanbul, Cumhuriyet Yayınları.
• Özbudun, Ergun (1987) “Turkey,” Myron Weiner ve Ergun Özbudun, derl., Competitive
Elections in Developing Societies. Durham, Duke University Press.
• ___________ (1968) Batı Demokrasilerinde ve Türkiye’de Parti Disiplini. Ankara:
Ankara Üniversitesi, Hukuk Fakültesi
• Roniger, Luis (1994) “The Comparative Study of Clietelism and the Changing Nature
of Civil Society in the Contemporary World,” Luis Roniger ve Ayşe Güneş-Ayata,
derl., Democracy, Clientelism and Civil Society. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
• Rustow, Dankwart A. (1973) “The Modernization of Turkey in Historical and Comparative
Perspective.” Kemal Karpat, derl., Social Change and Politics in Turkey.
Leiden: E. J. Brill.
• Sayarı, Sabri (1976) “Aspects of Party Organization in Turkey,” Middle East Journal,
Spring.
• _________ (1975) “Some Notes on the Beginning of Mass Political Participation in
Turkey,” Engin D. Akarlı ve Gabriel Ben-dor, derl., Political Participation in Turkey:
Historical Background and Present Problems. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University.
• Steinbach, Udo (1984) “Atatürk’s Impact on Turkey’s Political Culture Since World War
II,” Jacob Landau, derl., Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey. Boulder: Westview.
• Stockwin, J. A. (1992) “The Japan Socialist Party” Resurgence after a Long Decline,”
Ronald J. Hrenebar, derl., The Japanese Party System. Boulder: Westview.
• Sunar, İlkay (1990), “Populism and Patronage: The Democrat Party and Its Legacy
in Turkey,” Il Politico (Pavia, Italy), 55:4.
• Tachau, Frank (1991) :The Republican People’s Party, 1945-1980,” Metin Heper ve
Jacob Landau, derl., Political Parties and Political Democracy in Turkey. London: I.
Türk Siyasi Partilerinde Lider Oligarşisi: Evrimi, Kurumsallaşması ve Sonuçları 21
B. Tauris.
• Turan, İlter (1994), “Leadership Change in Turkey,” Mediterranean Politics, Cilt 1.
London: Pinter.
• ________ (1971), “Parti Disiplini: Kapsam, Tarihçe, Teşvik Eden Sebepler,” İstanbul
Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 28:1-4.
• ________ (1969) Cumhuriyet Tarihimiz. İstanbul: Çağlayan.
• Zeigler, Harmon (1993) Political Parties in Industrial Democracies. Itasca, İllinois:F.E.
Peacock.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com