You are here

İYİLESTİRME ÇALISMALARINDA EĞİTİM SİNERJİSİ VE KURUMSAL UYUM: MÜFREDAT LİDERLERİ İÇİN YÖNLENDİRMECİ UYARILAR

EDUCATIONAL SYNERGY AND INSTITUTIONAL HARMONY FOR BETTERMENT: GUIDING NOTICE FOR CURRICULUM LEADERS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Increasing the quality of education at schools has always been one of the ambitions educational leaders desire to approach systematically. Therefore, successful schools have always been placed under the spotlight; while examining how successful they happened to be and what steps were taken towards becoming a successful school. This study proposes educational synergy and institutional harmony as the key to success and draws attention to these concepts as the projection of successful schools. Having mentioned the significance of creating a synergy and harmony and pronouncing Hall’s Three-Dimensional Model of Culture, the problem of mentality fossilization at various levels is discussed. Then, the concept of mentality change is proposed as a solution to the problem.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Eğitim liderleri için okullardaki eğitimin niteliğinin arttırılması her zaman sistematik yaklasılan bir amaç olagelmistir. Bu nedenle basarılı okullar hep mercek altına alınmıslar; bir yandan nasıl basarılı oldukları incelenirken, öte yandan basarılı olma yolunda hangi adımların atıldığı belirlenmeye çalısılmıstır. Bu çalısma eğitim sinerjisini ve kurumsal uyumu basarının iki önemli anahtarı olarak önermekte ve basarılı okulların bir izdüsümü olarak bu kavramlara dikkat çekmektedir. Sinerjinin olusturulması ve uyumun sağlanması için atılabilecek adımlar tartısıldıktan ve Hall’in Üç- Boyutlu Kültür Modeli belirtildikten sonra anlayıs fosillesmesi kavramtemelli olası sorunların değisik düzlemleri ifade edilmekte ve bu sorunsala çözüm olarak anlayıs değisimi kavramı ileri sürülmektedir.
79-85

REFERENCES

References: 

Apple, M., & Beane, J. (Eds.). (2007).
Democratic Schools: Lessons in Powerful Education,
2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Byrnes, H. (1998). Constructing Curricula in
Collegiate Foreign Language Departments. In Learning
Foreign and Second Languages, 2nd ed. (pp. 262-295).
New York: Modern Language Association of America.Glatthorn, A., Boschee, F., & Whitehead, B.
(2006). Chapter 1: The nature of curriculum. In
Curriculum Leadership: Development and
Implementation (pp.3-32). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Glickman, C., Gordon, S., & Ross-Gordon, J.
(2005). Chapter 19: Curriculum development. In
Supervision and Instructional Leadership (pp. 293-
315). Boston: Pearson.
Gordon, S. (2004). Curriculum development.
In Professional Development for School Improvement
(pp. 236-261). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hewitt, T. (2006). Chapter 11: Managing and
implementing the curriculum. In Understanding and
shaping the curriculum (pp. 287-314). Thousand Oaks,
CA:Sage.
Kavrakoğlu, Đ. (1999). Toplumun çıkarı için:
Çatısma değil Đsbirliği. In Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Mezunlar
Derneği Yayın Organı, summer - pp. 37-40.
Kugelmass, J. (2004). The Inclusive School:
Sustaining Equity and Standards. New York: Teachers
College Press.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods:
Macrostrategies for Language Teaching, Yale
University Press, 2003.
Scheurich, J., & Skrla, L. (2003). Leadership
for Equity and Excellence: Creating Highachievement
Classrooms, Schools, and Districts.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Van Lier, L. (1998). Constraints and Resources
in Classroom Talk. Issues of Equality and Symmetry.
In Learning Foreign and Second Languages, 2nd ed.
(pp. 157-182). New York: Modern Language
Association of America.
Walker, D., & Soltis, J. (1986). Chapter 6: Aims
Revisited. In Curriculum and Aims. (pp. 67-83). New
York: Teachers College Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com