You are here

Toprak Solucanlarının Çevre Toksikolojisi Yönünden Değerlendirilmesi

The Ecotoxicological Assesment of Earthworms

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
: Earthworms are used for control of environmental pollution as a indicator organisms. Also they are keystone soil organism in regulating nutrient cycling. One of the other important role in soil ecosystems, they contribute to organic matter incorporation and decomposition. Soil organic matter has a source of energy for soil microflora and supports formation of soil structure.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Toprak solucanları, çevresel kirliliğin kontrolünde indikatör organizma olarak kullanılmaktadır. Ayrıca, besin siklusunun düzenlenmesinde anahtar organizmalardır. Toprak ekosistemlerindeki bir başka önemi, organik maddenin bağlanmasıve ayrıştırılmasının devamınısağlamaktır. Toprağın organik maddesi ise toprak mikroflorasına enerji kaynağıolmasının yanında toprak yapısının oluşumunu da desteklemektedir.



1. Aldaya, M.M, Lors, C, Salmon, S, Ponge, J.F.: Avoidance bio-assay may help tok test the
ecological significance of soil pollution. Environmental Pollution, 2006; 140: 173-180.
2. Allison, F.E.: Soil Organic Matter and Its Role in Crop Production, Elsevier, Amsterdam, New
York , 1973; 637.
3. Barois, I.: Mucus production and microbial activity in the gut of two species of Amynthas
(Megascolecidae) from cold and warm tropical climates, Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1992; 24:
4. Belotti, E.: Assessment of soil quality criterion by means of a field survey, Appl. Soil Ecol,1998;
10: 51–63.
5. Bradshaw, A.: The reconstruction of ecosystems. J.Apply.Ecol, 1993; 20: 1-17.
6. Conway, G.R and Pretty, JN.: Unwelcome Harvest: Agriculture and Pollution. Earthscan,
London, 1991.
7. Daniel, O. and Anderson, J.M.: Microbial biomass and activity incontrasting soil materials after
passage through the gut of the earthworm Lumbrcuis rubellusHoffmeister, Soil Biol & Biochem,
1992; 24: 465–470.
8. Edwards, C.A. and Bohlen, P. J.: Biology and Ecology of Earthworms (third ed), Chapman &
Hall, London, 1996.
9. Graham-Bryce, I. J.: Crop protection : a consideration of the effectiveness and disadvantages of
current methods and scope for improvement. Phil, Trans.R.Soc.Lond, 1977; 13 (281): 163-179.
10. Graham-Bryce, I. J.: Environmental aspects of pesticides-the development of understanding.
Brighton Crop Protection Conference Pests and Diseases, 1988; 2: 571-80.
11. Insam, H. and Domsch, K. H.: Relationship between soil organic carbon and microbial biomass
on chronosequences of reclamation sites, Microb. Ecol, 1988;15: 177–188.
12. Lanno, R., Wells, J., Conder, J., Bradham, K. and Basta, N.: The bioavailability of chemicals in
soil for earthworms, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf, 2004;57: 39–47.
13. Lee, K. E.: Earthworms: Their Ecology and Relationships with Soils and Land Use, Academic
Press, Sydney, 1985.
14. Lukkari, T., Teno, S., Vaisanen, A., Haimi, J.: Effects of earthworms on decomposition and
metal availability in contaminated soil: Microcosm studies of populations with different exposure
histories. Soil Biol&Biochem, 2006; 38: 359-370.
15. Ma, W.C. and Talmage, S.: Insectivora. In: R.F. Shoreand and B.A. Rattner, Editors,
Ecotoxicology of Wild Mammals, Wiley, New York, 2001; 123–158.
16. Malik, A. and Scullion, J.: Soil development on restored opencast coal sites with particular
reference to organic matter and aggregate stability, Soil Use Manage,1998; 14: 234–239.
17. Morgan, J.E. and Morgan, A. J.: The accumulation of metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn and Ca) by two
ecologically contrasting earthworm species (Lumbricus rubellusand Aporrectodea caliginosa):
implications for ecotoxicological testing, Appl. Soil Ecol. 1999; 13: 9–20.
18. Spurgeon, D.J. and Hopkin, S. P.: Seasonal variation in the abundance, biomass and biodiversity
of earthworms in soils contaminated with metal emissions from a primary smelting works, J. Appl.
Ecol,1999; 36: 173–183.
19. Van Gestel, C. A. M.: Scientific basis for extrapolating results from soil ecotoxicity tests to field
conditions and the use of bioassays. In: N.M. van Straalen and H. Løkke, Editors, Ecological Risk
Assessment of Contaminants in Soil, Chapman & Hall, London, 1997; 25–50

Thank you for copying data from