You are here

Büyük Beklentiler: Kendi Etnik Grubunu Çalışmak

Great Expectations: Studying My Own Community

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The literature on methodology in social sciences underlines advantages for the insider researcher in addition to more subtle problems and pitfalls in terms of the relationship between the researcher and the researched. This paper aims to explore my experiences as the insider researcher studying Circassians in Turkey, my own community and discuss their implications for researching Circassians in particular and ethnic groups in general. As the insider researcher position provided “great expectations” on the side of the researched and hence some critical advantages in the field for the researcher, the dual categories of insider and outsider are in reality rather fluid and contested. This article is an attempt to explore space in between: the negotiations, complexities and fluidities of positionality in the field and hence in the processes of academic knowledge production.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sosyal bilimlerde araştırmacının ‘içeriden’, araştırılan grubun bir üyesi olması, araştırmacı ve araştırılan arasındaki ilişki ve mesafe açısından çıkabilecek sorunların dışında, araştırmacı için genelde avantajlı bir konum olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu makale benim ‘içeriden’ bir araştırmacı olarak Türkiye’deki Çerkesleri çalışma deneyimlerimi ve bu deneyimlerin dar anlamda Çerkesleri, geniş anlamda ise etnik grupları çalışma açısından sonuçlarını tartışmayı hedeflemektedir. İçeriden araştırma yapma pozisyonu, araştırılanlar açısından “büyük beklentiler” ile karşılansa ve araştırmacı açısından da önemli avantajlar sağlasa da, ‘içeriden’ veya ‘dışarıdan olmak’ verili pozisyonlar değildir, araştırmacının akışkan olarak dahil olduğu veya dışlandığı, müzakere edilen ve mücadeleli alanlardır. Bu makale içeri ile dışarı arasındaki alana, sahada ve dolayısıyla da akademik üretim süreçlerinde konumsallığın getirdiği müzakerelere, karmaşıklıklara ve akışkanlıklara bakmayı hedeflemektedir.
63
86

REFERENCES

References: 

Abu-Loghodi, Lila. “Writing against Culture.” Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Ed. R.G. Fox. Santa Fe: School of American University Press, 1991. 137-162.
Alankuş, Sevda. “Geçmişten Geleceğe Çerkesler…” Geçmişten Geleceğe Çerkesler: Kültür, Kimlik ve Siyaset. Eds. Sevda Alankuş and Esra Oktay Arı. Ankara: KAFDAV, 2014, 9-62.
Altorki, Soraya. “At Home in the Field.” Arab Women in the Field: Studying Your Own Society. Eds. S. Altorki and C. F. El-Solh. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 1988. 49-68.
Baser, Bahar and Mari Toivanen. “Politicized and Depoliticized Ethnicities, Power Relations and Temporality: Insights to Outsider Research from Comparative and Transnational Fieldwork.” Ethnic and Racial Studies. (2017): 1-18.
Behl, Natasha. “Diasporic Researcher: An Autoethnographic Analysis of Gender and Race in Political Science.” Journal of Politics, Groups and Identities. (2016): 1-19.
Besleney, Zeynel A. The Circassian Diaspora in Turkey: A Political History. Oxon: Routledge, 2014. Bucerius, Sandra M. “Becoming a “Trusted Outsider”: Gender, Ethnicity, and Inequality in Ethnographic Research.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 42.6 (2013): 690-721.
Collet, Bruce A. “Confronting the Insider-Outsider Polemic in Conducting Research with Diasporic Communities: Towards a Community-Based Approach,” Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees. 25(1) (2008): 77-83.
Doğan, Kusha. Çerkes Halk Şarkıları: Wered 1. Istanbul: Majör Müzik, 2000. Cassette.
Doğan, Setenay Nil. “Ne Kadar Yakın Olsa da, Uzak: Türkiye'de Devlet ile Çerkesler Arasındaki İlişkiler.” Geçmişten Geleceğe Çerkesler: Kültür, Kimlik ve Siyaset. Eds. Sevda Alankuş and Esra Oktay Arı. Ankara: KAFDAV, 2014, 54-63. ---. “Changing the Boundaries of Knowledge: Talking about the Silence and the Break.” Borders and the Changing Boundaries of Knowledge. Eds. Inga Brandell, Marie Carlson and Önver A. Çetrez. İstanbul: Swedish research Institute, 2015, 145-159.
Dwyer, Sonya Corbin and Jennifer L. Buckle. The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8.1 (2009): 54-63.
Erciyes, Cemre. “Diaspora of Diaspora: Adyge-Abkhaz Returnees in the Ancestral Homeland.” Diaspora 17.3 (2008): 340-361.
Setenay Nil Doğan
84
Ertem, B. Gönül. Dancing to Modernity: Cultural Politics of Cherkess Nationhood in the Heartland of Turkey. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin. 2000.
Ganguly, Keya. “Migrant Identities: Personal Memory and the Construction of Selfhood.” Cultural Studies 6.1 (1992): 27-49.
Greene, Melanie J. “On the Inside Looking In: Methodological Insights and Challenges in Conducting Qualitative Insider Research.” The Qualitative Report 19 (2014): 1-13.
Hall, Stuart and B. Gieben. Formations of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
Halstead, Narmala. “Ethnographic Encounters. Positionings within and outside the Insider Frame.” Social Anthropology 9.3 (2001): 307-321.
Hamdan, Amani. “Reflexivity of Discomfort in Insider-Outsider Educational Research.” McGill Journal of Education 44.3 (2009): 377-404.
Henry, Marsha. “If the Shoe Fits: Authenticity, Authority and Agency Feminist Diasporic Research.” Women's Studies International Forum 30 (2007): 70–80.
Jacobs-Huey, Lanita. “The Natives Are Gazing and Talking Back: Reviewing the Problematics of Positionality, Voice, and Accountability among "Native" Anthropologists.” American Anthropologist 104.3 (2002): 791-804.
Kondo, Doreen K. Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
Labaree, Robert. “The Risk of ‘Going Observationalist’: Negotiating the Hidden Dilemmas of Being an Insider Participant Observer.” Qualitative Research 2.1 (2002): 97-122.
Miyazawa, Eiji. Memory Politics: Circassians of Uzunyayla, Turkey. School of Oriental and African Studies (University of London), 2004. Ph.D. Thesis.
Narayan, K. “How Native is a “Native” Anthropologist?” American Anthropologist 95.3 (1993): 671-686.
Özbay, Yismeyl Özdemir. Mitoloji ve Nartlar. Ankara: Kafdağı, 1990.
Rosaldo, R. Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press, 1993.
Schramm, K. “‘You Have your Own History: Keep Your Hands off Ours!’: On Being Rejected in the Field.” Social Anthropology 13.2 (2005): 171-183.
Shami, Seteney. “Studying Your Own: The Complexities of a Shared Culture,” Arab Women in the Field: Studying Your Own Society. Eds. Soraya Altorki and C. F. El-Solh. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press,1988. 115-138.
Great Expectations: Studying My Own Community
85
Stephenson, J. B. and L. S. Greer, “Ethnographers in their Own Cultures: Two Appalachian Cases,” Human Organization 40(2) (1981): 123-130, 129.
Toğuzata, Azmi. Çerkes Ezgileri . Istanbul: Ada Muzik, 1995. Cassette.
Tsaroïeva, Mariel. Anciennes Croyances des Ingouches et des Tchetchenes. 2005. Zhemukhov, Sufian. “The Birth of Modern Circassian Nationalism.” Nationalities Papers: Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 40.4 (2012): 503-524.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com