You are here

Eğitim Telif doğru Akademik Personel Algıları malzemeler

Perceptions of Academic Staff toward Copyright of Educational Materials

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Implementation of the effective copyright process in educational settings is the only way to sustain the development and distribution of the knowledge and preserve the creativity of the content developers. This paper outlines the knowledge and perceptions that academics have regarding copyright laws in relation to using external materials in the classroom. An online survey was distributed to gather data from 114 tertiary level academic staff employed at a Turkish state university. After introducing the theoretical background to the problem, this paper purports how the survey was carried out and then presents the data obtained. The results indicate that while most academics are aware of the existence of copyright laws, they do not possess a clear understanding on the legal applications in educational context. The study also revealed the need for educational institutions in Turkey to take the appropriate steps in providing adequate copyright law training for their academic staff.
68-80

REFERENCES

References: 

Bell, B. L.
(1980)
. The Controversy Over Establishing Fair Use Guidelines for Off-Air Videotaping for Educational Uses: A Case Study of Attempts to Formulate Policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Bozkurt, A. (2002).
Fikr
i Haklara İlişkin Sözleşmeler. Fikri Mülkiyet Kurultayı, 8-10 Ocak 2002, Ankara, Dedeman Oteli.
Center for Open and Sustainable Learning. (2006). Licensing materials for reuse. Retrieved April 18, 2012 from http://cosl.usu.edu/projects/start-an-ocw/intellectualproperty-for-openc....
Chase, M. E. (1989). An Evaluation of the Interpretation of the Fair-Use Doctrine with respect to the Videotaping in Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education and Selected State Related Schools. Unpublished master's thesis, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA.
Chase, M. E. (1993). Educators' Attitudes and Related Copyright Issues in Education: A Review of Selected Research 1980-1992. MC Journal: The Journal of Academic Media Librarianship,
1(1), 1-9.
Clark, J. H. (1984). Formulation of a Guide to University Copyright Policy Revision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2n ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Consortium of College and University Media Centers. (1996). Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia. Retrieved from http://www.adec.edu/admin/papers/fair10-17.html on 13.04.2012
Creative Commons. (n.d.). Creative Commons Legal Code. Retrieved May 7, 2012 from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/legalcode.
Crews, K. D. (1990). Copyright Policies at American Research Universities: Balancing Information Needs and Legal Limits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Gurcan, H.
İ.
, & Ozgur, A. Z. (2002). Uzaktan Eğitim Materyallerinde Telif Hakları ve Açıköğretim Fakültesinde Uygulama Örnekleri. AÖF'ün 20. Yılı Nedeniyle Uluslararası Katılımlı Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Sempozyumu. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, Türkiye
Heffernan, N. & Wang, S. (2008). Copyright and multimedia classroom material: A study from Japan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 167-180.
Honkasalo, P.
(2011)
. Links and copyright law. Computer law & Security review, 27(3), 258-266.
Horton, S. (2000). Simplified fair use guidelines for educational multimedia. Web teaching guide.
Retrieved March 21, 2012, from http://www.dartmouth.edu/*webteach/articles/copyright.
78
Serkan Çelik & Murat Akcayir / World Journal on Educational Technology (2012) 68-80
html.
James, A. F. (1981). Educator Attitudes Concerning Copyright. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.
Kelley, K.B., Bonner, K, McMichael, J.S., & Pomea, N. (2002). Intellectual property, ownership and digital course materials: A study of intellectual property policies at two- and fouryear colleges and universities. Portal: libraries and the academy, 2(2), 255-266.
Kromrey, J., Barron, A., Hogarty, K., Hohlfeld, T., Loggie, K., Schullo, S., Gulitz, E., Venable, M., Bennouna, S., & Sweeney, P. (2005). Intellectual Property and Online Courses: Policies at Major Research Universities. National Educational Computing Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
Lape, L. G. (1992). Ownership of copyrightable works of university professors: The interplay between the copyright act and university copyright policies. Villanova Law Review, 37, 223 - 269.
Lenhart, A. & Madden, M. (2005). Teen content creators and consumers. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC. Retreived May 2, 2012 from http://www.pewInternet.org/PPF/r/166/report_display.asp.
Lodder, A. R. (2000). Electronic Contracts and Signatures: National Civil Law in the EU will change drastically soon, 15th BILETA Conference: Electronic Datasets And Access To Legal Informatıon,14.October 2000, Coventry: 1-13.
Loggie, K. A., Barron, A. E., Gulitz, E., Hohlfeld, T. H., Kromrey, J. D., Venable, M., Sweeney, P. (2006). An Analysis of Copyright Policies for Distance Learning Materials at Major Research Universities. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5, 3, 224-242.
Mallor, J. P. (2004). Business Law: The Ethical, Global, and E-Commerce Environment, New York: McGraw/Hill.
Malonis, J. A. (2002). Intellectual property. In Gale encyclopedia of E-commerce, 2, 407-410.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2001). MIT opencourseware fact sheet. Retrieved July 8, 2006 from http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2001/ocw-facts.html
Masango, C. (2009). Understanding copyright in support of scholarship: Some possible challenges to scholars and academic librarians in the digital environment? International journal of information management, 29(3), 232-236.
McGrail, J., & McGrail, E. (2009). What's wrong with copyright: Educator strategies for dealing with analog copyright law in a digital World. Innovate Journal of online education, 5(3), 2.
Packard, A. (2002). Copyright or copy wrong: An analysis of university claims to faculty work. Communication Law and Policy, 7, 275 - 316.
Patzer, T. A. (2003). University copyright policies for online courses: an evaluative resource tool for unbundling rights of use, control, and revenue. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of South Florida.
79
Serkan Çelik & Murat Akcayir / World Journal on Educational Technology (2012) 68-80
Rogerson, S. (2002). Computers and society, Der. R.S.Spier, Science and technology ethics. London: Routledge.
Rowlands, I. & Nicholas, D. (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future. London: The University College London CIBER Group. Retreived May 2, 2012 from http://www.webcitation.org/5ZVa81TFt.
Simpson, C.A. (2005). Copyright for schools: A practical guide. Worthington, OH: Linworth Books.
Starr, L. (2005). Applying fair use to new technologies: Part 4 of an Education World series on copyright and fair use. Education World. Retreived May 1, 2012 from http://www.education- world.com/a curr/curr280d.shtml.
Tang. G. H. (2010). Is administrative enforcement answer? Copyright protection in the digital era. Computer law & Security review, 26(4), 406-417.
Twigg, C. A. (2000). Who owns online courses and course materials? Intellectual property policies for a new learning environment. Troy, NY: Center for Academic Transformation.
Wanda N. & Gerald B. (2005). Copyright Matters!: Some Key Questions and Answers for Teachers, 2nd ed. (Toronto: Council of Ministers of Education, Canada, 2005). Retrieved from http://www.cmec.ca/else/copyright/matters/indexe.stm on 01.05.2012.
Wertz, S. L. (1984). Knowledge of the 1976 General Revision of the Copyright Law, PL 94-553, By College ad University Media Center Directors in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com