You are here

THE EFFECT OF CONTEXT IN ACHIEVEMENT VOCABULARY TESTS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study investigated the effect of context on the performances of students in achievement vocabulary tests. Two different tests, discrete and contextualized, having the same target vocabulary items were designed by the researcher and were administered to 123 elementary students at Afyon Kocatepe University English preparatory program. The data were analyzed through descriptive statistics. The results revealed that students performed better in the contextualized test, and there is a significant difference between the performances of students. The results also showed that there was a positive and direct correlation between the tests, and these two tests could be used instead of each other in a degree of 56%, which means context is not a must in achievement vocabulary tests.
126-134

REFERENCES

References: 

Cameron, L. (2001) Teaching Languages to Young Learners. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing Second Language Skills: theory and practice. (3rd Ed.). New York: Harcourt
Brace Javanovich, Inc.
Ellis, R & Redman, S. (1989) A way with words. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fitzpatrick, T. & Clenton, J. (2007) The challenge of validation: Assessing the performance of a test of
productive vocabulary. Language Testing. 27(4) 537–554.
Folse, K. & Bologna, D. (2003). Targeting Listening and Speaking: Strategies and Activities for ESL/EFL Students.
Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
Harmer, J. (1991). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.
Hatch, E. & Brown, C. (1995) Vocabulary, Semantic and Language Education. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Heaton, J.B. (1988) Writing English Language Tests. London. Longman.
Lado, R. (1964) Language testing; the construction and use of foreign language tests: a teacher's book. New
York, McGraw-Hill.
Laufer, B. & Goldstein, Z. (2004) Testing Vocabulary Knowledge: Size, Strength and Computer Adaptiveness.
Language Learning. 53 (4), 399-436.
Nation, I. S. P. and Hwang K. (1995) Where would general service vocabulary stop and special purposes
vocabulary begin? System 23, 35-41.
Pearson, P. D. & Hiebert, E. H. & Kamil, M. L. (2007) Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need
to learn. Reading Research Quarterly. 42 (2), 282-296.
Qian, David D. (2008) From Single Words to Passages: Contextual Effects on Predictive Power of Vocabulary
Measures for Assessing Reading Performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, v5 n1 p1-19 2008. 19 pp.
Read, J. (1997a) Assessing vocabulary in a second language. In Clapham, C. & Corson, D. (eds.) Encyclopedia of
Language and Education. Language Testing and Assessment. 7, 99-107.
Read, J. (1997b) Vocabulary and testing. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (eds.) Vocabulary: Description,
Acquisition and Pedagogy. (303-320) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Read, J. (2000) Assessing Vocabulary. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Read, J. and Chapelle, C. (2001) A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing 18
(1), 1-32.
Read, J. (2007) Second Language Vocabulary Assessment: Current Practices and New Directions. International
Journal of English Studies. 7 (2), 105-125.
Schmitt, N. (1994) Vocabulary Testing: Questions for Test Development with Six Examples of Tests of
Vocabulary Size and Depth. Thai TESOL Bulletin. 6 (2), 9-16.
Schmitt, N. (2000) Vocabulary in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stahl, K. A. D. & Bravo, M. A. (2010) Contemporary Classroom Vocabulary Assessment for Content Areas. The
Reading Teacher. 63(7), 566–578.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com