You are here

Home » Content

ARDUINO AND PHP BASED ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION

Journal Name:

  • Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World

Publication Year:

  • 2017

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
With the development of information technologies, the electronic voting system which began to be used in many areas and it also affected the field of education and it has been used in many countries in the learning process. In this study, a voting material that can be used in lectures has been developed in order to determine the level of knowledge and opinions of the students. The voting unit to be developed is sensitive to hand pressure, and Arduino Mega is used as an electronic card. In addition, a PHP based software system is developed to collect and use data generated from voting material so that results can be evaluated in a computer environment. The system enables the user to interactively determine the students' feelings and thoughts and helps the lecturers to edit the course content, material.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-arduino-and-php-based-electronic-voting-system-design-and-implementation.pdf
  • 2
5
12
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Akkuş N. & Ege M. & Ataş E. (2012). Sınıf İçi Elektronik Sınav ve Oylama Sistemi Geliştirilmesi ve
Uygulaması, 6th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium , 4-6 October
2012, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Barber, M., & Njus, D. (2007). Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design. CBE-Life Sciences
Education , 6(1), 1-8.
Cubric, M., & Jefferies, A. (2015). The benefits and challenges of large-scale deployment of electronic
voting systems: University student views from across different subject groups. Computers &
Education , 87, 98-111.
d'Inverno, R., Davis, H., & White, S. (2003). Using a personal response system for promoting student
interaction. Teaching Mathematics and its applications , 22(4), 163-169.
Draper, S. W., Cargill, J., & Cutts, Q. (2002). Electronically enhanced classroom
interaction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology , 18(1).
Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. I. (2002, March). Use of the PRS (Personal Response System) handsets at
Glasgow University. Interim Evaluation Report: March 2002.
http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/handsets/interim.html (accessed 24 May 2017).
Halloran, L. (1994). A comparison of two methods of teaching. Computer managed instruction and
keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture. Computers in Nursing , 13(6), 285-288.
Jackson, M. H., and Trees, A. R. (2003). Clicker implementation and assessment.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b839/2f06960ab52fbd02ea3cac699df52f6d36... (accessed 24
May 2017).
Lang, J., & Kostrab, R. (2015, January). Event based application of voting system for mobile device.
In Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI), 2015 IEEE 13th International Symposium
on (pp. 119-122). IEEE.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL
AND INSTRUCTIONAL STUDIES IN THE WORLD
May 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 2 ISSN: 2146-7463
COPYRIGHT © JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND INSTRUCTIONAL STUDIES IN THE WORLD
12
Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004, April). Classroom response and communication
systems: Research review and theory. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association , San Diego, CA (pp. 1-8).
Simpson, V., & Oliver, M. (2006). Using electronic voting systems in lectures. Report. University of
Surrey.
Simpson, V., & Oliver, M. (2007). Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now: A comparison
of research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2).
Weldemariam, K., & Villafiorita, A. (2010, July). A Survey: Electronic Voting Development and Trends.
In Electronic Voting (pp. 119-131).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com