You are here

Assessing Location Attractiveness for Manufacturing Automobiles

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2321
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: Evaluating country manufacturing location attractiveness on various performance measures deepens the analysis and provides a more informed basis for manufacturing site selection versus reliance on labor rates alone. A short list of countries can be used to drive regional considerations for site-specific selection within a country. Design/methodology/approach: The two-step multi attribute decision model contains an initial filter layer to require minimum values for low weighted attributes and provides a rank order utility score for twenty-three countries studied. The model contains 11 key explanatory variables with Labor Rate, Material Cost, and Logistics making up the top 3 attributes and representing 54% percent of the model weights. Findings: We propose a multi attribute decision framework for strategically assessing the attractiveness of a country as a location for manufacturing automobiles. Research limitations/implications: Consideration of country level wage variation, specific tariffs, and other economic incentives provides a secondary analysis after the initial list of candidate countries is defined. Practical implications: The results of our modeling show China, India, and Mexico are currently the top ranked countries for manufacturing attractiveness. These three markets hold the highest utility scores throughout sensitivity analysis on the labor rate attribute weight rating, highlighting the strength and potential of manufacturing in China, India, and Mexico.Originality/value: Combining MAUT with regression analysis to simplify model to core factors then using a “must have” layer to handle extreme impacts of low weight factors and allowing for ease of repeatability.
817
852

REFERENCES

References: 

Arrow, K.J. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. The Rate and
Direction of Inventive Activity. Economic and Social Factors, 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400879762-
024
Badri, M.A., Davis, D.L., & Davis, D. (1995). Decision support models for the location of firms in
industrial sites. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(1), 50-56.
https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510077205
Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2013). Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The
Role of Allocation and Selection. The American Economic Review, 103(1), 305-334.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.305
Bozarth, C.C., Warsing, D.P., Flynn, B.B., & Flynn, E.J. (2009). The impact of supply chain complexity on
manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 78-93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.07.003
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2015). Available at: http://www.bls.gov/fls/china.htm (Accessed: March 2015).
Canbolat, Y.B., Chelst, K., & Garg, N. (2007). Combining decision tree and MAUT for selecting a country
for a global manufacturing facility. Omega, 35(3), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.07.002
Dogan, I. (2012). Analysis of facility location model using Bayesian Networks. Expert Systems with
Applications: An International Journal, 39(1), 1092-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.109
Economist Intelligence Unit (2014). London, England. Available at: http://www.eiu.com/
Ellram, L.M. (2013). Offshoring and reshoring: an update on the manufacturing location decision. Journal
of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12019
EY (2014). Bribery and corruption: A survey by EY’s Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services Practice. EYGM
Limited. Available at: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Bribery_and_corruption:_ground_...
$FILE/EY-FIDS-Bribery-and-corruption-ground-reality-in-India.pd (Accessed: June 2016).
Faria, A.J. (2014). Major Automotive Assembler Investment Announcements. University of Windsor, Odette
School of Business. Windsor: Office of Automotive and Vehicle Research.
Fensom, A. (2014). The Diplomat. Available at: http://thediplomat.com/2014/02/last-of-the-automakers-to-leaveaustralia/
(Accessed: October 2014).Global Edge – Michigan State University (2014). East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Available at: http://globaledge.msu.edu/
Gould, E., & Kimball, W. (2015). “Right-to-Work” States Still Have Lower Wages. Economic Policy Institute.
Available at: http://www.epi.org/publication/right-to-work-states-have-lower-wages/ (Accessed: March 2016).
Gummer, C. (2014). Behind Germany's Success Story in Manufacturing. Wall Street Journal. Available at:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-germanys-success-story-in-manufacturi... (Accessed: April 2016).
Hanawalt, E.S., & Rouse, W.B. (2010). Car wars: Factors underlying the success or failure of new car
programs. Systems Engineering, 13(4), 389-404.
Helper, S.K. (2012). Why Does Manufacturing Matter? Which Manufacturing Matters? Brookings Institurion.
Metropolitan Policy Program paper.
Hoffman, J.J., & Schniederjans, M. (1996). A two-stage model for structuring global facility site selection
decisions: the case of brewing industry. Facilities, 23-34.
IHS Automotive: Automotive Forecasting (2014). Englewood, Colorado, United States of America.
Available at: https://www.ihs.com/industry/automotive.htm l
Keeney, R.L. (1982). Decision analysis: an overview. Operations research, 30(5), 803-838.
https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.5.803
Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives–preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge &
New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174084
Lamarre, E., Pergler, M., & Vainberg, G. (2009). Reducing risk in your manufacturing footprint. McKinsey.
MacCormack, A., Newman III, L., & Rosenfield, D. (1994). The new dynamics of global manufacturing
site selection. Sloan Management Review, 69-79.
Min, H. (1994). International supplier selection: a multi-attribute utility approach. International Journal of
Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(5), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039410064008
Niesse, M. (2002). Alabama put forth more than $234M to snag Hyundai plant. Available at:
http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2002/04/06/fin_alabama_put_forth.html (Accessed: February 2016).
Platts, K.W. (2002). Make vs. buy decisions: A process incorporating multi-attribute decision-making.
International Journal of Production Economics, 77(3), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00177-8Tate, W. L., Ellram, L.M., Schoenherr, T., & Petersen, K.J. (2014). Global competitive conditions driving
the manufacturing location decision. Business Horizons, 57(3), 381-390.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.12.010
The Boston Consulting Group. (2014). The Shifting Economics of Global Manufacturing.
The World Bank (2014). Connecting to Compete 2014: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. Washington, DC:
The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Vidal, C.J., & Goetschalckx, M. (2000). Modeling the affect of uncertainties on global logistics systems.
Journal of Business Logistics, 95-120.
Voice of America (2016). As Egypt's Dollar Crisis Deepens, Push to Cut Imports Casts Shadow Over Economy.
Available at: http://www.voanews.com/content/epypt-dollar-crisis/3225989.html (Accessed: June 2016).
Wessner, C.W. (2013). How Does Germany Do It? ASME. Available at: https://www.asme.org/engineeringtopics/
articles/manufacturing-processing/how-does-germany-do-it (Accessed: April 2016).
What Tennessee paid to lure lawbreaking Volkswagen to Chattanooga (n.d.). Institute for Southern
Studies. Available at: http://www.southernstudies.org/2015/09/what-tennessee-paid-to-lure-lawbr....
html (Accessed: February 2016).
World Economic Forum (n.d.). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014. 2013: World Economic
Forum.
Yang, J., & Lee, H. (1997). An AHP decision model for facility location selection. Facilities, 241-254.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02632779710178785

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com