You are here

Strategic alliance in technological development and innovation: Performance evaluation of co-creation between companies and their supply chain

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The Brazilian oil and gas market presents a perspective of growth in the next decades. Considering this scenario, the increasing number of participants in this supply chain is foreseen to supply the demand of goods and services, especially in the technological development area. The paper intends to evaluate the collaborative development capacity and respective measurements of performance on these partnerships established between customer and suppliers, through qualitative research with a sample of Brazilian oil and gas market representative. Design/methodology/approach: This paper intends to verify if the co-creation performance is measured after an implementation, specific in a restricted industry. The methodology consists in a bibliographical research to support the study, and it also had a questionnaire sent to Brazilian companies that take part of the oil and natural gas industry supply chain, to analyze if the results of co-creation activities are measured by this group of companies, to verify its attractiveness to develop the co-creation usage or change the type of partnership with the market. Findings: The misunderstanding of co-creation and technical partnership was noticed. The usage of teams working together from two or more organizations cannot be considered as a co-creation, because the relationship and obligations are different between these two ways of workgroup. But the companies of oil and gas industry, when questioned, were able to distinguish it, avoiding risks of incorrect results motivated by wrong interpretation of the paper content. Research limitations/implications: As related in the paper, eight companies were invited to take part on the questionnaire about co-creation, but only 50% answered it. The research should have a better result of this subject if it had been developed with more answers of Brazilian oil and gas industry companies. Originality/value: Even this kind of partnership is used in oil and natural gas industrial segment, the measurement isn´t correct used. The value of this paper is to show that companies that are using co-creation could detect the best opportunities to apply it, due to the attractiveness that each situation can generate.

REFERENCES

References: 

ANP. (2011). Vendas pelas distribuidoras dos combustíveis derivados de petróleo. Agência
Nacional do Petróleo. Superintendência de Planejamento e Pesquisa. Brasília, Brasil.
Canellas, A.L.S. (2007). Evolução da importância econômica da indústria de petróleo e gás
natural no Brasil: contribuição a variáveis macroeconômicas. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Creswell, J.W., & Clark, V.L.P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage
Publications. Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Fischer, M.M., & Varga, A. (2002). Technological innovation and interfirm cooperation: An
exploratory analysis using survey data from manufacturing firms in the metropolitan region of
Vienna. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(7–8), 724–742.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2002.003080
Freel, M.S., & Harrison, R.T. (2006). Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector:
evidence from Northern Britain. Regional Studies, 40(4), 289-305.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400600725095
Furtado, A.T. (2003). Mudança institucional e inovação na indústria brasileira de petróleo.
Colóquio Internacional “Energia, Reformas Institucionales y Desarrollo en America Latina”,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F.
Ghemawat, P. (2007). A estratégia e o cenário dos negócios: texto e casos (2nd Ed). Porto
Alegre: Bookman.
Hunger, D. (2002). Gestão estratégica: princípios e práticas. Prentice Hall, NJ, EUA.
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard – measures that drive
performance. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 71-79.
Kaydos, W. (1991). Measuring, managing, and maximizing performance: what every manager
needs to know about quality and productivity to make real improvements in performance.
Productivity Press Inc.
Kim, W.C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). A estratégia do oceano azul: como criar novos mercados
e tornar a concorrência irrelevante. 14th edition. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation and control. 8th
edition. Prentice Hall, Englewwod Cliffs, NJ, EUA.
Luecke, R. (2005). Harvard business essentials: managing creativity and innovation. Boston:
Harvard Business School Press.
Neely, A. D. (1998). Measuring business performance: why, what and how. London. Economist
Books Press.
Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards, H., Gregory, M., Bourne, M. et al. (2000) Performance
measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. International
Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(10), 1119-1145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570010343708
Nelson, R. (1992). National innovation systems, a comparative analysis. Oxford Universtiy
Press, New York & London.
Nudurupati, S.S., & Bititci, U.S. (2000). Review of performance management information
systems (PerforMIS), internal report. Centre for Strategic Manufacturing, DMEM, University of
Strathclyde, UK.
Petrobras. Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (2011). Investment plan 2011-2015. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Porter, M. (1980). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, N.Y. USA.
Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). O futuro da competição: como desenvolver
diferenciais inovadores em parceria com os clientes. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Press.
UNICAMP (2010). Inovação. Retrieved from: http://www.inovacao.unicamp.br/noticia.php?
id=727, December 4th
.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com