REGULATORY INCONSISTENCIES RESULTING IN EXPROPRIATORY MEASURES: THE DUTY OF THE STATE TO WARN, OR DUTY OF INVESTOR TO BE AWARE?

i Richard J. Goossen, Technology Transfer in the Peoples' Republic of China: Law and Practice (Martinus Nijhoff 1987) 10
ii Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. The Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. AA 227
iii The Russian Federation v Veteran Petroleum Limited, Yukos Universal Limited and Hulley Enterprises Limited,
C/09/477160 / HA ZA 151,
152
and 15112.
iv Khan Resources Inc., Khan Resources B.V. and CAUC Holding Company Ltd. v. The Government of Mongolia and MonAtom
LLC, PCA Case No. 2011-09
v Transglobal Green Energy, LLC and Transglobal Green Panama, S.A. v. Republic of Panama (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/28)
vi Maffezini v Spain, 16 ICSID Review-FILJ 248 (2001)
vii CME v. Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Arbitration Proceedings (Award, 14 March 2003)
viii TECMED v Mexico, Award, 43 ILM 133 (2004).
ix LG&E v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1 (Award, 3 October 2006)
x Crystallex International Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/11/2
xi Metalclad v Mexico 5 ICSID Reports 209 (2001)
xii Mamidoil Jetoil Greek Petroleum Products Societe S.A. v. The Republic of Albania, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/24
xiii MTD v Chile, 12 ICSID Reports 6
xiv Ibid, para 165
xv Ibid, para 186
xvi Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling Co. v. Egypt, 7 ICSID Reports 2 (2002)
xvii TECMED v Mexico, Award, 43 ILM 133 (2004), in para 162
xviii Rudolf Dolzer and Christoph Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 162
xix Tarcisio Gazinni, ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties’ in Bilateral Investment Treaties in Tarcisio Gazinni, Eric
Brabandere (eds), International Investment Law: The sources of rights and obligations (Martinos Nijhoff Publishers 2012) 114.
xx S. D. Myers v. Canada 40 ILM 1408 (2000)
xxi Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ve Sanayi A. S. v Pakistan (Case No. ARB/03/29)
xxii Saluka v Czech Republic, IIC 210 (2006).
xxiii ibid
xxiv Mondev International Ltd. v. United States of America 16 ICSID Review-FILJ 299 (2001)
xxv Occidental v. Ecuador, London Court of International Arbitration (Award, 1 July 2004)
xxvi Suzanne A. Spears, ‘The Quest For Policy Space In A New Generation Of International Investment Agreements’
(2010) 13(4) J of Int Econ Law 1038
xxvii Rudolf Dolzer and Christoph Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 19
xxviii Methanex Corporation v United States 44 ILM 1345 (2005)
xxix Metalclad v. Mexico 5 ICSID Reports 209 (2001)
xxx North American Free Trade Agreement, 32 I.L.M. 289 and 605 (1993).
xxxi Metalclad v. Mexico 5 ICSID Reports 209 (2001)
xxxii Angelos Dimopoulos, EU Foreign Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2011) 182
xxxiii Occidental v. Ecuador, London Court of International Arbitration (Award, 1 July 2004) 320
xxxiv Rudolf Dolzer and Christoph Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 148
xxxv Italy - Jordan BIT (1996), Art 2(4).
xxxvi Lone Wandahl Mouyal, International Investment Law and the Right to Regulate, A Human Right Perspective,
(Rutledge 2016) 19
xxxvii Parkerings v Lithuania, ICSID Review (2007) 22
Regulatory Inconsistencies Resulting in Expropriatory Measures: The Duty of the State to Warn, or Duty of
Investor to be Aware?
85

xxxviii Mamidoil Jetoil Greek Petroleum Products Societe S.A. v. The Republic of Albania, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/24
xxxix Quiborax S.A. and Non-Metallic Minerals S.A. v. Plurinational State of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/2)
xl Copper Mesa Mining Corporation v. Republic of Ecuador, PCA No. 2012-2
xli Electrabel S.A. v. Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/1
xlii Philip Morris Brands Sàrl, Philip Morris Products S.A. and Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case
No. ARB/10/7
xliii Khan Resources Inc., Khan Resources B.V. and CAUC Holding Company Ltd. v. The Government of Mongolia and MonAtom
LLC, PCA Case No. 2011-09, Award on the Merits, para 319
xliv Ibid, paras 350, 358.
xlv TECMED v Mexico, Award, 43 ILM 133 (2004)
xlvi Ben Mostafa, ‘The Sole Effect Doctrine, Police Powers and Indirect Expropriation under International Law’
(2008) AILJ 292
xlvii Articles on Responsibility of States for International Wrongful Acts ILC 2001, Art 4
xlviii Ibid, Art 7
xlix Mr. Kristian Almås and Mr. Geir Almås v. The Republic of Poland, PCA Case No. 2015-13
l Southern Pacific Properties (Middle East) Ltd (SPP) v. Egypt 8 ICSID Rev 328 (1992)
li Rudolf Dolzer and Christoph Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 135
lii MTD v Chile, 12 ICSID Reports 6
liii Parkerings v Lithuania, ICSID Review 22 (2007)
liv OECD Principles for Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure, no. 20.
lv Corona Materials, LLC v. Dominican Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/14/3
lvi Adel A. Hamadi Al Tamimi v. Sultanate of Oman, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/33