You are here

The Influence of Strategic Planning and Storyline Complexity on EFL Learners’ Narrative Retellings

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This research study is primarily an attempt to examine the effects of engaging in strategic planning before retelling narratives with different degrees of storyline complexity on complexity, accuracy, and fluency in the oral production of learners of English as a foreign language (EFL).To this aim, the effects of four task performance conditions (i.e., strategic planning with a single storyline narrative task, no strategic planning with a single storyline narrative task, strategic planning with a dual storyline narrative task, no strategic planning with a dual storyline narrative task) on learners’ complexity, accuracy, and fluency in producing English language were examined. Sixty Iranian intermediate-level EFL learners participated in this study. The results of one-way ANOVAs revealed that though giving learners the opportunity to engage in strategic planning before retelling a narrative with two storylines exponentially advantages complexity, it impairs accuracy. The outcomes have certain theoretical and pedagogical implications for researchers and practitioners in EFL context.
20-36

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahmadian, M. J. (2012a). The effects of guided careful online planning on complexity, accuracy and fluency in
intermediate EFL learners’ oral production: The case of English articles. Language Teaching Research, 16, 129-149.
Ahmadian, M. J. (2012b). The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral performance under task-based careful online planning condition. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 165-175.
Ahmadian, M.J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition
on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35-59.
Anderson, J.R. (1995). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York: Wiley.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1998). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of
tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 471-508.
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M.
Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.
23-49). London: Longman.
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367-383.
Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12-20.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance in a second language. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task-Based
performance (pp. 3-34). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral
production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474-509.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2005). The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R.
Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in second language (pp. 167-92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Foster, P. (1996). Doing the task better: How planning time influences students’ performance. In J. Willis & D. Willis
(Eds.), Challenge and Change in Language Teaching (pp.126-135). London: Heinemann.
Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native
and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language
Learning, Teaching, and Testing (pp. 75-93). Harlow: Longman.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-323.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The in and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3,
215-247.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied
Linguistics, 21, 354-375.
Saeedi, M.,The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 2013–1, 20-36
33
Gilabert, R. (2007). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and +/- Here-and-Now:
Effects on L2 oral production. In M. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136-156).
Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Harris, C., & Bates, E. (2002). Clausal background and pronominal reference: A functionalist approach to c-command.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 237-269.
Hooper, P. J., & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251-299.
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied
Linguistics, 30, 461-73.
Lennon, P. (1991). Error: Some problems of definition, identification and distinction. Applied Linguistics, 12, 180-195.
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. (1993). Language use in normal speakers and its order. In G. Blanken, H. Dittman, H. Grimm, J. Marshal, &
C. Wallesch (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp.1-15). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2001). “A case of exercising”: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance.
In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and
testing (pp. 141-63). London: Longman.
Matthiessen, C., & Thompson, S. (1988). The structure of discourse and subordination. In J. Haiman & S. Thompson
(Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 95-120). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
McLaughlin, B., & Heredia, R. (1996). Information processing approaches to research on second language acquisition
and use. In R. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), A handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 213-228). San Diego, CA:
Academic Press.
Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different length of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83-108.
Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 Oral Performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, redefining, and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30, 590-601.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection Language and nativelike
fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication. London: Longman.
Polanyi-Bowditch, L. (1976). Why the whats are when: Mutually contextualizing realms of narrative. Berkeley
Linguistics Society, 2, 59-77.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential
framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-55.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.),
Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing (pp. 167-185). Harlow: Longman.
Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1-14.
Skehan, P. (2009). Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis.
Applied Linguistics, 30, 510-532.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language
performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185-211.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings.
Language Learning, 49, 93-120.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction
(pp.183-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tabachnik, B.G., & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
Tavakoli, P. (2009a). Assessing L2 task performance: Understanding effects of task design. System, 37, 482-495.
Tavakoli, P. (2009b). Investigating task difficulty: learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 19, 1-25.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2011). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on
learner output. Language Learning, 61, 37-72.
Saeedi, M.,The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 2013–1, 20-36
34
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning
and task performance in a second language (pp. 239- 77). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Tomlin, R. (1984). The treatment of foreground-background information in the on-line descriptive discourse of
second language learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 115-142.
VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second
Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production. Unpublished Ph.D.Thesis, Temple University,
Japan.
Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language
Testing, 14, 85-106.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and
accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1-27.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com