You are here

THE ROLE OF OWNERSHIP ON BEHAVIOR OF DIVIDEND PAYERS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.156
Abstract (2. Language): 
The objectives of this study are to give empirical evidences about cash cow firms and free cash flow theory. Conducting compare means paired samples t test and logistic regression with samples of 141 firms which listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for period 2009 to 2014, this study proves dividend payers in Indonesia are not cash cows and ownership has role in determining behavior behind dividend policy. Firms with individuals and/or public ownership both for larger and smaller size shall pay dividends for some other intentions, but firms with institutional and/or state ownership concerns with its size shall pay dividends because : first, they are not at cash cows status or not under circumstance of internal conflict; second, they shall behave like cash cows in order of conflict avoidance
59
68

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

AIVAZIAN, V. A., GE, Y., & QIU, J. (2005). The impact of leverage on firm investment :
Canadian evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 277-291.
BARCLAY, M. J., HOLDERNESS, C. G., & SHEEHAN, D. P. (2009). Dividends and
corporate shareholders. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2423-2455.
BRAV, A., GRAHAM, J. R., HARVEY, C. R., & MICHAELY, R. (2005). Payout policy in
the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics 77, 483-527.
CHANG, E. C., & WONG, S. M. L. (2004). Political control and performance in China’s
Listed Firms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 617-636.
COOPER, M. J., JACKSON III, W. E., & PATTERSON, G. A. (2003). Evidence of
predictability in the cross-section of bank stock returns. Journal of Banking and
Finance, 27, 817-850.
DEANGELO, H., DEANGELO, L., & STULZ, R. M. (2006). Dividend Policy and the
Earned/Contributed Capital Mix : A Test of the Life-Cycle Theory. Journal of
Financial Economics, 81(2), 227-254.
DECHOW, P. M. (1994). Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm
performance - The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
18, 3-42.
EASTERBROOK, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American
Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659.FAIRCHILD, R., GUNEY, Y., & THANATAWEE, Y. (2014). Corporate dividend policy in
Thailand : Theory and Evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 31, 129-
151.
FAULKENDER, M., & WANG, R. (2006). Corporate financial policy and the value of cash.
The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1957-1990.
GRULLON, G., MICHAELY, R., & SWAMINATHAN, B. (2002). Are Dividend Changes a
Sign of Firm Maturity? The Journal of Business, 75(3), 387-424.
JENSEN, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeover.
American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
JENSEN, M. C. (1988). Takeovers : Their causes and consequences. The Journal of
Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 21-48.
KUAN, T. H., LI, C. S., & LIU, C. C. (2012). Corporate governance and cash holdings : A
quantile regression approach. International Review of Economics and Finance, 24,
303-314.
MYERS, S. C. (2001). Capital structure. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 81-
102.
NEALE, B., MILSOM, T., HILLS, C., & SHARPLES, J. (1998). The hostile takeover
process : a case study of Granada versus Forte. European Management Journal, 16(2),
230-241.
ROSS, S. A., WESTERFIELD, R. W., & JAFFE, J. (2008). Corporate Finance, 8th Edition.
New York, NY : The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
SHAY, J. P., & ROTHAERMEL, F. T. (1999). Dynamic competitive strategy : towards a
multi-perspective conceptual framework. Long Range Planning, 32(6), 559-572.
THAKOR, A. V., & WILSON, P. F. (1995). Capital requirements, loan renegotiation and the
borrower's choice of financing source. Journal of Banking and Finance, 19, 693-711.
WANG, H. (2011). Managerial entrenchment, equity payout and capital structure. Journal of
Banking and Finance, 35, 36-50.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com