You are here

Home » Content

HOW DEPRESSION AND SOCIAL MEDIA PREFERENCES AFFECT FINANCIAL INVESTMENT&GAMBLING RISK TAKING BEHAVIOURS

Journal Name:

  • Journal of Life Economics

Publication Year:

  • 2017
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.215

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study mainly examines the relationship between financial investment and gambling risk-taking tendencies and depression. In addition, how financial investment and gambling risk taking attitudes and depression level change with respect to age, gender and social media preferences are also analyzed in this study. DOSPERT Scale with subscales of financial investment and gambling and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) are used for evaluating financial investment&gambling risk-taking tendencies and depression level respectively. According to this study, female chooses the less risky financial tool that is female prefers financial investment instead of financial gambling. Moreover, when the subject come to the topic that whether there is a relation between social media preferences and financial risk taking behaviors or not, it is founded that social media users prone to take more financial investment risks with respect to non-users. In this research, it is founded that while depression score is decreasing, financial investment risk taking tendency is increasing. On the contrary, another finding shows us that while depression score is increasing, financial gambling risk taking tendency is also increasing. Analysis also shows us that depression is increasing with age and depression levels are lower in who prefers to use Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Swarm and WhatsApp than in who does not prefer.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-how-depression-and-social-media-preferences-affect-financial-investmentgambling-risk-taking-behaviours.pdf
  • 14
143
156
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J., (1961) An inventory for measuring
depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry; 4:561–71.
Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for
adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Cihangir, M., Şak, N., &Bilgin, Ş. (2016) Individual Investor Demographics: Investigation Of
Risk Return Preferences inOsmaniye with Multinomial Probit Model.The Journal of
Accounting and Finance.April.
Coşkun, Yenerand Umit, A. Öznur (2016).Cointegration Analysis Between Stock Exchange
and TL/FX Saving Deposits, Gold, Housing Markets in Turkey, January, Business and
Economics Research Journal, 7 (1): 47-69.
Gümüş, Fatih. B., Koç, Mustafa, Agalarova, Mirsariyya, (2013). “Determining Of
DemographicAnd Psychological FactorsEffective On InvestmentDecision Of
Individuals:Practice Of Turkey AndAzerbaijan”. Kafkas University Journal of
Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 4(6), 71-93.
Hamurcu, Cagri, Aslanoğlu, Suphi (2016). Impacts Of Behavioral Biases In Finance On The
Employees In The Information And Communication Technology (ICT) Sector: A
Scale Study. Ulakbilge, Volume 4, Issue 7. (31-53).
Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., &Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk
aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15268-15273.
Weber, E. U., Blais, A. R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale:
Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of behavioral decision making,
15(4), 263-290.
Yaşar, M. Ruhat. (2010). Gambling And Bets. Electronic Journal of SocialSciences, 138-
171(34).Autumn-Volume:9 Issue:34.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com