You are here

PROBLEM DEFINITION AS A STIMULUS TO THE CREATIVE PROCESS: ANALYSIS OF A CLASSROOM EXERCISE

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.175
Abstract (2. Language): 
Dealing with problem-solving has been a growing challenge in teaching engineering and over the career of these professionals. To increase the ability to understand a problem and consequently improve the quality of the solutions, an exercise was proposed to students of an MBA program, and they have experienced some challenges on interpreting briefing and procedures, to improve creativity and ability on solving problems. The implicit goal was to deal with the understanding of procedures to perform activities in a company and the exercise showed different ways of communicating a scenario and, consequently, different reactions depending upon the briefing. Preliminary results of the exercise indicated that the higher the degree of uncertainty on the problem definition or on an activity description, the more often association is attempted through individual repertoire, covering more varied options. In the case of a tight briefing, the creative effort appears to be overlapped by the execution of simple operations, resulting on a deviation from the required goal. Through a brief theoretical framework, this essay intends to validate these perceptions and increase the use of techniques that improve creative and problem-solving capacity in product design and development.
274
290

REFERENCES

References: 

Asimow, M. (1962). Introduction to design. NY: Prentice-Hall.
Berg, H., Taatila, V., & Volkmann, C. (2012). Fostering creativity - a holistic framework for
teaching creativity. Development and Learning in Organizations, 26(6), 5-8.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14777281211272242
Clark, K.B., & Wheelwright S.C. (1993). Managing new product and process development: Text and Cases.
NY: Free Press.
Christiaans, H. (1992). Creativity in design. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft.
Dorst K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution.
Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6Dorst, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design
Studies, 16(2), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00012-3
Evans, J.H. (1959). Basic design concepts. Journal of the American Society for Naval Engineers, 71(4),
671-678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1959.tb01836.x
French, M.J. (1985). Comceptual design for engineers. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
3-662-11364-6
Henderson, R.M., & Clark, K.B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing
product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1),
9-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
Kaminski, P.C. (2000). Desenvolvendo produtos com planejamento, criatividade e qualidade. São Paulo:
Livros Técnicos e Científicos Editora.
Massaro, M., Bardy, R., & Pitts, M. (2012). Can creativity be learned? The knowledge integration
role of Management Control Systems during the creative process. In: Proceedings of the 4rd
European Conference on Intellectual Capital, Arcada University of Applied Sciences Helsinki, 272-278
April 2012, Helsinki, Finland.
Mozota, B.B. (2003). Design management-using design to build brand value and corporate innovation. NY:
Allworth Press.
Mumari, B. (1987). Fantasia-invenção, criatividade, imaginação na comunicação visual. Lisboa: Editorial
Presença.
Munford, M.D., Medeiros, K.E., & Partlow, P.J. (2012). Creative thinking: processes, strategies,
and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.003
Neve, T.O. (2012). Begin with the end to solve business problems and create a competitive
advantage. In: Proceedings of the 4rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital, Arcada University of
Applied Sciences Helsinki, 338-344 April 2012, Helsinki, Finland.
Nezu, A., & D'Zurilla, T.J. (1981). Effects of problem definition and formulation on the
generation of alternatives in the social problem-solving process. Cognitive Therapy and Research,
5(3), 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193410Ohlsson, S. (2012). The problems with problem solving: Reflections on the rise, current status,
and possible future of a cognitive research paradigm. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(1), 101-128.
https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1144
Osburn, H.K., & Munford, M.D. (2006). Creativity and planning: training interventions to
develop creative problem-solving skills. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 173-190.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1802_4
Paton, B., & Dorst K. (2011). Briefing and reframing: A situated practice. Design Studies, 32(6),
573-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.002
Reyes, P. (2012). Projetando pela exterioridade do projeto. Strategic Design Research Journal, 5(2),
91-97. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2012.52.05
Schön, D.A. (1996). The reflective practitioner - How professionals think in action. London: Arena.
Sternberg, R.J., & Sternberg, K. (2011). Cognitive Psychology. Belmont: Wadswoth.
Ulrich, K., & Eppinger, S.D. (2012). Product design and development. NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Valkenburg, R., & Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3),
249-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com