You are here

Home » Content

KIRIM’IN “SELF-DETERMİNASYONU” NASIL YORUMLANABİLİR?

Journal Name:

  • Karadeniz Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Political events in Ukraine resulted in Crimea’s self-determination. Its separation from Ukraine and unification with Russia caused criticisms. This situation is stemmed from tense relations between Russia and West and from the problematic structure of self-determination. In their official declarations, Crimea’s and Russia’s reference to Kosovo’s self-determination leads to question Kosovo and self-determination. Examples of Kosovo and Crimea are different from and against the right of self-determination that has widespread acceptance in international law. Both instances have common elements. Previously, internal self-determination options like autonomy were tried to be implemented but they were not successful. Kosovo and Crimea preferred to use option of external self-determination. Through addition of political conditions, opportunity is offered to choose secession via self-determination. This situation indicates that internal self-determination options have to be enhanced and the ones who want to alter current character of the right have to focus on right’s internal options.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Ukrayna’daki siyasi olaylar Kırım’ın self-determinasyonu ile sonuçlanmıştır. Ukrayna’dan ayrılıp Rusya’ya bağlanması eleştirilmesine neden olmuştur. Bu durum gerginleşen Rus-Batı ilişkilerinden ve selfdeterminasyon hakkının sorunlu yapısından kaynaklanmaktadır. Kırım ve Rusya’nın resmî açıklamalarında Kosova’nın self-determinasyona yer vermesi hem Kosova’nın hem de self-determinasyonun tartışılmasına sebebiyet vermiştir. Kosova ve Kırım örnekleri, uluslararası hukukta genelgeçer kabule sahip olan self-determinasyon hakkından farklıdır, aykırıdır. Her iki örneğin ortak noktaları da bulunmaktadır. Öncesinden özerklik gibi iç self-determinasyon seçenekleri uygulanmaya çalışılmış fakat başarılı olunamamıştır. Kosova ve Kırım, dış self-determinasyon seçeneğini kullanmayı tercih etmiştir. Siyasi koşullar eklenince self-determinasyonun ayrılık seçeneğiyle kullanılması için imkân bulunmaktadır. Bu durum iç self-determinasyon koşullarının iyileştirilmesini, hakkın mevcut halini değiştirmek isteyenlerin bahse konu alana odaklanması gerektiğini göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kirimin-self-determinasyonu-nasil-yorumlanabilir.pdf
  • 43
87
115
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1514 (XV). Declaration on the Granting of Independence to colonial countries
and peoples, http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?sy
mbol=A/RES/1514(XV).
1541 (XV). Principles which should guide Members in determining whether
or not obligation exits to transmit the information called for under Article
73e of the Charter, http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_
doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/1541(XV).
2787 (XXVI). Importance of the Universal Realization of the right of peoples
to self-determination and of the speady granting of independence to
colonial countries and peoples for the effective guarantee and observance
of human Rights, http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLU
TION/GEN/NR0/328/03/IMG/NR032803.pdf?OpenElement.
BAYILLIOĞLU, U. (2011). “Uluslararası Adalet Divanı Kosova’nın Kendi Kaderini
Tayin Hakkını Onayladı mı?”, TBB Dergisi, s. 287-311.
BOB, Y. J. (2014). “Rule of Law: Comparing Crimea and Kosovo”, The Jerusalem
Post, 22 April, http://www.jpost.com/LandedPages/PrintArti
cle.aspx?id=346070, 21 Ağustos 2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
BORGEN, C. J. (2008). “Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence: Self-Deter
mination, Secession and Recognition”, American Society of International
Law: Insight, 29 February, Volume: 12, Issue 2, http://www.
asil.org/insights/volume/12/issue/2/kosovos-declaration independence-
self-determination-secession-and.
BOWRING, B. (2005) “Chapter 4: The Crimean autonomy: Innovation or
anomaly?”, Self-Governance and Conflict Resolution: Innovative Appoaches
To İnstitutional Design in Divided Societies, Marc Weller and
Stefan Wolff (eds), Routledge, Oxon, s.75-97.
s.92; Gwendolyn Sasse, 2002, “Conflict Prevention in a Transition State: The
Crimean Issue in Post-Soviet Ukraine”, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics,
vol.8, no.2, s.1-26.
BRAJSHORİ M. - JOVANOVİÇ, İ. (2013). “Tarihi Anlaşma Kosova ve Sırbistan’ın
Önünü Açabilir”, Southeast European Times, http://www.seti
Kırım’ın “Self-Determinasyonu” Nasıl Yorumlanabilir?
113
mes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/tr/features/setimes/features/2013/
04/20/feature-01, 20 Nisan, 25 Ağustos 2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, (2009).“Fact Sheet: Summary of
the Comprehensive Proposal for the Kosovo Status Agreement”, U.S.
Department f State, 20 January 2009, http://www.state.gov/p/
eur/rls/fs/101244.htm, 22 Ağustos 2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
EBAI, S. E. (2009). “The right to self-determination and the Anglophone
Cameroon situation”,The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol.
13, No. 5, December,s. 631–653.
EROL, Mehmet Seyfettin “ ‘Ukrayna-Kırım Krizi’ ya da ‘İkinci Yalta Süreci’”,
Karadeniz Araştırmaları, Bahar 2014, Sayı 41, s.1-14.
EZETAH, C. R. (1999). “Chapter 15: Legitimate Governance and Statehood in
Africa: Beyond the Failed Statea nd Colonial Self-Determination”,
Edward Kofi Quashigah and Obiora Chinedu Okafar (eds), Legitimate
Governance in Africa: International and Domestic Legal Perspectives,
Kluwer Law International, s. 419-459.
s. 449, dipnot 102, Brietzke, “Self-Determination or Jurisprudential
Confusion: Exacerbating Political Conflict”, (1995) 14 Wisconsin
International Law Journal, p. 69
“Full text: Kosovo declaration”, BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/
2/hi/europe/7249677.stm, 17 February 2008, 24 Ağustos 2014 tarihinde
erişilmiştir.
GANGULYA, R. and TARAS, R. (1998). “Chapter 2: Ethnic Conflict and
International Norms”, Understanding Ethnic Conflict: The International
Dimension, Longman, New York, s.41-67.
HANNUM, H. (1990). Chapter 3: Self-Determination”, The International Legal
Context, Autonomy, Sovereignty and Self-Deterination: The Accomodation
of Conflicting Rights, University of Pennsylvania Press,
Philadelphia, s. 27-49.
HASANI, E. (1993). Self-Determination, Territorail Integrity and Inter
national Stability: The Case for Yugoslavia, National Defence Academy
Institute for Peace Support and Conflict Management, Vienna, s.1-372.
KER-LINDSAY, J. (2013). “Preventing the Emergence of Self-Determination:
An Assessment of the Kosovo ‘Unique Case’ Argument”, Europe-Asia
Studies, Vol.65, No. 5, July, pp.837-856.
KIMMINICH, O. (1993). “A ‘Federal’ Right of Self-Determination?”, Modern
Law of Self-Determination, Christian Tomuschat (ed), Martinus Nijhoff
Publishers, Dordrecht, s. 83-100.
s.86, dipnot 10: J. J. Paust, “Self-Determination: A Definitional Focus”, in Y.
Alexander and R. A. Friedlander (eds), Self-Determination: National,
Regional, and Global Dimensions, 1980, s.13
Ceren Gürseler
114
KISSINGER, H. A. (20149.“To Settle the Ukraine Crisis, Start at the End,” The
Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/henrykissinger-
to-settle-the-ukraine-crisis-start-at-theend/
2014/03/05/46dad868-a496-11e3-8466-
d34c451760b9_story.html, 5 March, 21 Ağustos 2014 tarihinde
erişilmiştir.
MALYARENKO T. and GALBREATH, David J. (2013). “Crimea: Competing
Self-Determination Movements and the Politics at the Centre”, Europe-
Asia Studies, Vol.65, No.5, July, s. 912-928.
s. 914, dipnot 4: “CSCE Wants to have Permanent Representation in Kiev”,
Switalski Ctk National News Wire, 18 June 1994.
s.914, dipnot 5: “Ethnic Equality, not Ethnic Cleansing: Eight Years into Freedom,
Ukraine Emerges as a Democratic Role-Model for Balkans”,
Knight Ridder/Tribune, 22 April 1999.
McCORQUODALE, R. (1992). “Self-Determination Beyond the Colonial
Context and Its Potential Impact on Africa”, African Journal of
International and Comparative Law, 592, s.592-608.
s.602, dipnot 67 Pomerance, Self-Determination in Law and Practice
(1982) supra n.7, p. 15
MUEHLEBACH, A. (2003). “What Self in Self-Determination? Notes From the
Frontiers of Transnational Activism”, Identities: Global Studies in
Culture and Power, 10, s.241-268.
NAYAR, M. G. K.(1975).“Self-Determination Beyond the Colonial Context:
Biafra in Retrospect”, Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 10, no.2,
s.321-345.
PAZARCI, H. (1999). Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri III.Kitap, Turhan Kitabevi,
Ankara.
POMERANCE, M. Self-Determination in Law and Practice: The New Doctrine
in the United Nations, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hagues, 1982.
s. 79, dipnot 19: F. Llewellyn Jones, “Plebiscites”, Transactions of the Grotius
Society, vol. 13 (1928)(supra, n.12), s. 182.
SPECTOR, S. J. (2009). “Western Sahara and Self-Determination Debate”,
Middle East Quarterly, Vol. 16, No.3, Summer, s.33-43.
-----, (2011). “Negotiating Free Association between Western Sahara and
Morocco: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Formulas for Self-
Determination”, International Negotiation, 16, s.109-135.
STEPANOWA, A. (2014). “ International Law and legality of secession in
Crimea”, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law,
http://cjicl.org.uk/2014/04/20/international-law-legality-secessioncrimea/,
20 April. 20 Ağustos 2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
Kırım’ın “Self-Determinasyonu” Nasıl Yorumlanabilir?
115
TATARENKO, A. (2014).“The Legal Status and Modern History of Crimean
Autonomy”, Verfassungsblog, http://www.verfassungsblog.de/en/ thelegal-
status-and-modern-history-of-crimean-autonomy/#.U-iRfeN_tR
4, 2 April. 20 Ağustos 2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
VÄRK, R. (2014)“The Incorporation of Crimea into Russia: Legal Perspective”,
Diplomaatia, no.128, http://www.diplomaatia.ee/en /article
/krimmi-liitmine-venemaaga-oiguslik-vaatenurk/, April.
WELLER, M. (2005a). “The Self-determination Trap”,Ethnopolitics, Vol. 4,
No. 1, March, s.3-28.
-----, (2005b) “Chapter 3: Enforced autonomy and self-governance: The
post-Yugoslav experince”, Autonomy, Self-Governance and Conflict Resolution:
Innovative Appoaches to Institutional Design in Divided Societies,
Marc Weller and Stefan Wolff (eds), Routledge, Oxazon, s.49-74.
-----, (2009). “Settling Self-Determination Conflicts: Recent Developmenys”,
The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No.1, s. 111-165.
s. 112, dipnot 1:Quinn, “Self-Determination Movements and Their
Outcomes”, in J.J. Hewitt, J. Wilkenfeld, and T.R. Gurr (eds), Peace and
Conflict 2007 (2008), at 33
s.112, dipnot 2:Quinn, “Self-Determination Movements and Their
Outcomes”, in J.J. Hewitt, J. Wilkenfeld, and T.R. Gurr (eds), Peace and
Conflict 2007 (2008), at 35, 38
s. 113, dipnot 5: J. Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law
(2nd edn, 2007).
WOLFF, S. and WELLER, M. (2005).“Chapter 1: Self-Determination and Autonomy:
A Conceptual Introduction”, Autonomy, Self-Governance and
Conflict Resolution: Innovative Approaches to Institutional Design in Divided
Societies, Marc Weller and Stefan Wolff (eds), Routledge, Oxon,
s.1-25.
WOLFF, S. - RODT. A. P. (2013), “Self-Determination After Kosovo”, Europe-
Asia Studies, Vol. 65, No.5, July, s.799-822.
WYDRA, D. (2004). “Crimean Authority and Self-Determination”, International
Journal on Minority and Group Rights, Vol. 10, s.111-130.
s.112, dipnot 2: Sasse Gwendolyn, ‘Die Krim-regionale Autonomie in der
Ukraine’, Breichte des BIOst 31-1998; s.7; see also Zajcev, ‘Istorija
Ukrainy’, Svit, L’viv 1996, s. 91-93

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com