You are here

Home » Content

GELENEKSEL YAKLAŞIMDAN YAPILANDIRMACI YAKLAŞIMA GEÇİŞTE ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ GÖRÜŞ VE DEĞERLENDİRMELERİ; BİR SÖYLEM ANALİZİ*

THE OPINIONS OF PRESERVICE TEACHERS IN TRANSITION FROM TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTIVISM: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Journal Name:

  • Karadeniz (Black Sea-Çernoye More) Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this qualitative study, it is aimed to describe preservice teachers’ ideas and assesments about their konwledge and education related to constructivism. The study group of the study was formed 24 students taking education in Cumhuriyet University Educational Faculty. These senior students were getting their education in the program of Turkish Teaching (10 students) and Elementary Education (14students). Reflections written by the students in the study group, related to constructivism, their education and assessment of themselves and information forms to determine the context were analyzed by the method of discourse analysis. According to the results of the study pre-service teachers found themselves are adequate in terms of theoretical knowledge but are lacking in practical knowledge. Students believe that deficiency originates from lack of education including enough training with constructivist application. More practical course, giving courses in line with constructivism, the more written, visual, and more usage of resources involving the approach are proposed.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu nitel çalışmada Türkçe Eğitimi ve Sınıf Öğretmenliği Programlarında eğitim alan öğretmen adayı öğrencilerin yapılandırmacı yaklaşımla ilgili olarak aldıkları eğitim ve yeterliklerine ilişkin görüş ve değerlendirmelerinin ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi son sınıfta okuyan ve rastgele seçilen 10 Türkçe Öğretmenliği 14 Sınıf Öğretmenliği Programı öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma grubundaki öğrencilerin yazdıkları, yapılandırmacılık yaklaşımı, eğitimleri ve bilgilerinin değerlendirmelerini içeren yazılar, öğrencilerin doldurduğu -bağlamın belirlendiği- bilgi formları eşliğinde söylem çözümlemesi yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre öğretmen adayları kendilerini kuramsal bilgi açısından yeterli ama uygulama yönünden yetersiz bulmuşlardır. Öğrenciler bu yetersizliklerini yeterince yapılandırmacı yaklaşıma uygun uygulama ile eğitim almamalarından kaynaklandığını belirtmişlerdir. Daha fazla uygulama dersi, derslerin yapılandırmacılığa uygun olarak verilmesi, daha fazla yazılı, görsel ve uygulama içeren kaynakların kullanımı öneriler arasında yer almaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 18.11.pdf
  • 18
123-135
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

BRİSCOE, Carol., STOUT, David. (1996). Integrating math and science through
problem centered learning in methods courses: Effects on prospective teachers’ understanding
problem solving. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 8, 66–87.
KARADENİZ
(Black Sea-Черное Море) Yıl 5 Sayı 18
134
CONNOR, J.R., SCHARMANN, Lawrence .C. (1996). Influence of cooperative early
field experience on preservice elementary teachers’ science self-efficacy. Science
Education, 80, 419-436.
CROTTY, Michael. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and
Perspective in the Research Process. Thousands Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
DUFFY, Thomas. M. & CUNNİNGHAM, Daniel. J. (1996). Constructivism:
Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.) Handbook
of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New Jersey: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
EREN, Altay. (2010) Consonance and dissonance between Turkish prospective
teachers’ values
and practices: Conceptions about teaching, learning, and assessment Australian Journal
of Teacher Education Vol 35, 3, May 2010
FOSNOT, Catherine. T. 1996. “Constructivism: A Psychological Theory of Learning.”
In Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives and Practice, ed. C. T. Fosnot, 8–33. NewYork:
Teachers College Press
GEE, James. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and
method(2nded.). New York: Routledge
GÜR, Tahir.(2011). Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının dil tutumları ve kullanımlarının
söylem çözümlemesi yöntemi ile betimlenmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Eğitim
Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Atatürk Üniversitesi
HAMAT, Afendi. ve EMBİ, Mohammad. A. (2010) Constructivism in The Design Of
Online Learning Tools. European Journal of Educational Studies 2(3)
HARRIS, Zellig.S. (1952) Discourse Analysis. Language 28: 1-30
HENDRY, D. Graham. Frommer, M., ve Walker, R. A.. 1999. “Constructivism and
Problem-based Learning.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 23 (3): 359–371
HEROD, Le-K. 2003. Promoting Reflective Discourse In Canadian Adult Literacy
Community: Asynchronous Discussion Forums. New Horizons In Adult Education 17(1).
MACLELLAN, Effie., ve SODEN. Rebecca. 2004. “The Importance of Epistemic
Cognition in Student-centered Learning.” Instructional Science 32: 253–268
OGAN-BEKİROGLU, Feral. ve AKKOÇ, Hatice. Preservice Teachers ’ Instructional
Beliefs
And Examinatıon Of Consistency Between Beliefs And Practices. International Journal
of Science and Mathematics Education 7: 1173 Y 1199
PHİLLİPS, Nelson ve HARDY, Cynthia.(2002).Discourse Analysis Londra: Sage
Publications
Rorty, R. (1967) The Linguistic Turn Chicago: University of Chicago Press
VAN DİJK, Teun. (1997) Discourse as Structure and Process Londra Sage
VON GLASERFELD, Ernst. 1984. An Introduction to Radical Constructivism” In P.
Watzlawick (Ed.) The Invented Reality. pp. 17-40. New York: Norton.
KARADENİZ
(Black Sea-Черное Море) Yıl 5 Sayı 18
135
VYGOTSKY, Lev. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher
Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
WELLS, Gordon. 1995. Language and the Inquiry-oriented Curriculum. Curriculum
Inquiry 25(3): 233-248.
WITTROCK, Merlin.C. 1990. Generative processes of comprehension. Educational
Psychologist 24 (4): 345-376.
WODAK, Ruth. and MEYER, Michael. (eds.) (2001) Methods of Critical Discourse
Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com