You are here

Lyell’ın, Lamarck’ın Evrim Kuramını Eleştirisinin Bir Değerlendirmesi

An Evaluation of Lyell’s Critisizm of Lamarck’s Theory of Evolution

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Lamarck’s theory is the single most comprehensive theory of evolution before Darwin’s theory. However, it was neither persuaded nor even entertained by most of his contemporaries, due probably to its materialism, speculative character, and failure to be publicized well among intellectuals. Lyell seems to be the only exception who dedicated several chapters of the second volume of his Principles of Geology to Lamarck’s theory and introduced it to British naturalists including Darwin. In this paper I review both Lamarck’s theory and Lyell’s criticism and then argue that although Lyell’s critical examination of Lamarck’s theory is, in general, a fair treatment of this theory, there are certain cases in which Lyell’s arguments are not as persuasive as he thought them to be.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Lamarck’ın kuramı, Darwin’in kuramından önceki en kapsamlı evrim kuramıdır. Fakat maddeciliği, bazı konulara yaklaşımının fazlasıyla spekülatif olması ve dönemin aydınları tarafından iyi bilinmemesi nedeniyle Lamarck’ın kuramı çağdaşlarının pek çoğu tarafından ne destek gördü ne de yeterince dikkate alındı. Ancak Lyell bu açıdan bir istisna sayılabilir çünkü Jeolojinin İlkeleri adlı kitabının ikinci cildinin bazı bölümlerini Lamarck’ın kuramına ayırmış ve onu Darwin dâhil tüm Britanyalı doğa bilimcilere tanıtmıştır. Bu yazıda ben önce Lamarck’ın kuramını ve Lyell’ın eleştirilerini gözden geçiriyorum. Sonra da, her ne kadar Lyell’ın eleştirel incelemesinin, genel olarak adil bir değerlendirme olsa da bazı noktalarda Lamarck’ın kuramına karşı, Lyell’ın sandığı kadar etkili olmadığını göstermeye çalışıyorum.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
117-130

REFERENCES

References: 

BYNUM, William F. (1984) “Charles Lyell’s Antiquity of Man and Its Critics”, Journal
of the History of Biology, vol.17, pp. 153-187.
COHEN, Claudine (1998) “Charles Lyell and the evidences of the antiquity of man”,
Lyell: the Past is the Key to the Present, eds. D. J. Blundell and A. S. Scott, pp. 83-93, London:
Geological Society of London.
COLEMAN, William (1962) “Lyell and the ‘Reality’ of Species: 180-1833”, Isis, vol. 53,
iss. 3, pp. 325-338.
CORSI, Pietro (1978) “The Importance of French Transformist Ideas fort the Second
Volume of Lyell’s Principles of Geology”, The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 11,
pp. 221-244.
DARWIN, Charles (1958) The Origin of Species, New York:Mentor.
GRENE, Marjorie & DEPEW, David (2004) The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic
History, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
HOOYKAAS, Reijer (1963) Natural Law and Divine Miracle: The Principle of
Uniformity in Geology, Biology and Theology, Leiden: E. J. Brill.
LAMARCK, Jean-Baptiste (1963) Zoological Philosophy, trans. H. Eliot, New York:
Hafner Publishing Company.
LYELL, Charles (1969) Principles of Geology, vol. 2, New York: Johnson Reprint
Corporation.
MANDELBAUM, Maurice (1957) “The Scientific Background of Evolutionary Theory in
Biology”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 18, iss. 3, pp. 342-361.
RUSE, Michael (2003) Darwin and Design, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
SHANER, Ralph F. (1927) “Lamarck and the Evolution Theory”, The Scientific Monthly,
vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 251-255.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com