You are here

Home » Content

Popper ve Evrim Teorisi

Popper and the Theory of Evolution

Journal Name:

  • Kaygı: Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article examines the ideas Popper propounded about the scientific status of the theory of evolution, about whether the theory has a truly scientific character. I first present Popper’s perspective on the criteria that need to be met by the kind of knowledge that claims to be scientific. In the following, I discuss Popper’s basic theses in the philosophy of science and their implications for an assessment of epistemological structure of evolutionary theory. Basic position of evolutionary theory concerning biological reality is roughly described, with a view to bringing out the structure of evolutionary argumentation. I note that while Popper, up to 1977, maintains that the evolutionary theory is a “metaphysical research programme”, a comprehensive and fertile one, he, in his later thought, abandons this claim and attempts to carve out a scientific status for the evolutionary theory, which, however, involves some tensions for the whole logic of the falsificationist strategy.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale, evrim teorisinin bilimsel statüsü hakkında, bu teorinin gerçek anlamda bilimsel bir karaktere sahip olup olmadığı hakkında Popper’ın ortaya koyduğu fikirleri incelemektedir. Önce Popper’ın bilimsel olma iddiasındaki bir bilgi türünün karşılaması gerektiğini düşündüğü kriterlere ilişkin bakış açısını sunuyorum. Devamında, Popper’ın bilim felsefesi alanındaki temel savlarını ve bu savların evrim teorisinin epistemolojik yapısına yönelik imalarını tartışıyorum. Evrim teorisinin biyolojik gerçekliğe ilişkin temel konumu, evrimci argümantasyonunun yapısını ortaya çıkarma gayesiyle betimlenmektedir. Popper’ın, 1977’ye dek, evrim teorisinin “metafizik bir araştırma izlencesi” olduğunu, ve verimli ve kapsamlı bir izlence olduğunu, öne sürdüğünü, ama geç dönem düşüncesinde bu iddiasından vazgeçtiğini ve evrim teorisine bilimsel bir statü kazandırmaya giriştiğini, ancak bunun da tüm bir yanlışlamacı stratejinin mantığı açısından, beraberinde getirdiği bazı gerilimlerin bulunduğunu not ediyorum.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-popper-evrim-teorisi.pdf
  • 17
57-70
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

BIRCH, L.C. and Ehrlich, P.R. (1967) “Evolutionary History and Population Biology”,
Nature, 214:349-352.
CURD M. and COVER, J. A. (1998) Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, New
York: W. W. Norton & Company.
DAWKINS, R. (1998, 1983) “Universal Darwinism”, The Philosophy of Biology, ed. D.
L. Hull and M. Ruse, Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press, pp. 15-37.
GATTEI, S. (2009) Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Science: Rationality Without
Foundations, London: Routledge.
GONZALEZ, W. J. (2004) “The Many Faces of Popper’s Methodological Approach to
Prediction”, in Karl Popper: Critical Appraisals, ed. Philip Catton and Graham Macdonald,
London: Routledge.
GOULD, S. J. and LEWONTINE, R. C. (1979) “The Spandrels of San Marco and the
Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme”, Proceedings of the Royal
Society of London, B205, pp. 581-598.
GOULD, S. J. (1994) Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes, New York: W. W. Norton &
Company.
Popper and the Theory of Evolution
70 2011/17
GRENE, M. (1959) “The Faith of Darwinism”, Encounter 13 (5): 48-56.
LLOYD, E. A. (1998) “The Theory of Evolution”, Routledge Encyclopedia of
Philosophy, CD-ROM, Version 1.0, London and New York: Routledge.
LEHMAN, H. (1967) “Are Biological Species Real?”, Philosophy of Science 34/2, pp.
157-167.
POPPER, K. R. (1944) The Open Society and Its Enemies, London: Routledge.
———, (1957) The Poverty of Historicism, Boston: The Beacon Press.
———, (2002) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Harper & Row (originally
published in 1959).
———, (1972) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
———, (1976) Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography, London: Routledge.
———, (1980) “Evolution”, Letters, New Scientist, 21 August 1980.
———, (1983) A Pocket Popper, ed. David Miller, Glasgow: Fontana Press.
———, (1987) “Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind”, Evolutionary
Epistemology, and the Sociology of Knowledge, ed. G. Radnitzky and W. Bartley, La Salle: Open
Court Press.
———, (1990) A World of Propensities, Bristol: Thoemmes.
———, (1997) “Science: Problems, Aims, Responsibilities” (originally published in
1963), The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality, ed. M.A. Notturno,
London: Routledge.
PLANTIGA, A. (1998) “When Faith and Reason Clash: Evolution and the Bible”, The
Philosophy of Biology, ed. D. Hull and M. Ruse, Oxford: OUP, pp. 674-697.
REICHENBACH, H. (1951) The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, Berkeley: University of
California Press.
ROSE, S. (1998) Lifelines: Biology Beyond Determinism, Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
ROTH, A. A. (1977) “Does Evolution Qualify as a Scientific Principle?”, Origins 4(1):4-
10.
RUSE, M. (1977) “Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Biology”, Philosophy of Science, vol.44,
No.4, pp. 638-661.
———, (1982) Darwinism Defended: A Guide to the Evolution Controversies, Reading,
Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
———, (2008) The Evolution Wars: A Guide to the Debates, New York: Greyhouse
Publishing.
SOBER, E. (1984a) “Evolutionary Theory as a Theory of Forces”, The Nature of
Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus, ed. E. Sober, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp.
13-59.
———, (1984b) “Survival, Reproduction, Causation”, The Nature of Selection:
Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus, ed. E. Sober, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 87-102.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com