You are here

Home » Content

Toprak Etiğinin Olabilirliği ve Zorunluluğu Üzerine

On the Possibility and Necessity of the Land Ethic

Journal Name:

  • Kaygı: Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Environmental scientists warn us that we, together with nature, might be doomed unless necessary measures are taken. Aldo Leopold asserts that an ethic which makes us responsible for the preservation of whole nature, with all its constituents, is evolutionarily possible and ecologically necessary. Land ethic has been especially criticized for its holistic perspective. For this may lead to violation of individual rights, and to a sort of fascism, called ecofascism. J. Baird Callicott’s attempts to save land ethic from ecofascism make land ethic impotent to save nature, and contrary to his intentions, also anthropocentric. In this paper, it is argued that this dilemma that land ethic faces can be resolved by endorsing a weak anthropocentric position, which is fairly compatible with Leopold's own views.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çevrebilimciler, gerekli önlemler alınmazsa bizim doğayla birlikte yok olabileceğimizi söylüyorlar. Aldo Leopold, bütün bileşenleriyle birlikte tüm doğanın korunması için bizi sorumlu kılacak bir etiğin, evrimsel açıdan mümkün ve çevrebilimsel açıdan zorunlu olduğunu belirtmektedir. Toprak etiği, özellikle bu bütüncü yaklaşımından ötürü eleştirilmektedir. Bu yaklaşımın bireysel hakların ihlal edilmesine, hatta ekofaşizm diye adlandırılan bir tür çevre faşizmine yol açabileceği düşünülmektedir. J. Baird Callicott’un toprak etiğini çevre faşizmi suçlamasından kurtarmak için ileri sürdüğü görüşlerse toprak etiğini güçsüzleştirmekte ve Callicott’un savunduğunun aksine, onu insanmerkezci yapmaktadır. Bu yazıda, toprak etiğinin karşı karşıya bulunduğu bu ikilemin, Leopold’ün görüşleri ile uyumlu olarak, zayıf insanmerkezci bir etik anlayışla giderilebileceği iddia edilmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-toprak-etiginin-olabilirligi-zorunlulugu-uzerine.pdf
  • 17
92-101
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

CALLICOTT, J. B. (1989) “The Conceptual Foundations of the Land Ethic,” In Defense
of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Albany, New York: State University of
New York Press, pp. 75-99.
(1999) “Holistic Environmental Ethics and the Problem of Ecofascism,” Beyond the Land
Ethic: More Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Albany, New York: State University of New
York Press, pp. 59-76.
CROOK, S. (2002) “Callicott’s Land Communitarianism” Journal of Applied Philosophy
vol. 19, iss. 2, pp. 175-184.
FINGARETTE, H. (1967) On Responsibility, New York: Basic Books.
LEOPOLD, A. (1966) A Sand County Almanac: With Essays on Conservation from
Round River, New York: Ballantine Books.
(1991a) “Some Fundamentals of Conservation in the Southwest [1923],” The River of the
Mother of God and Other Essays by Aldo Leopold, eds. S. L. Flader & J. B. Callicott, Madison,
Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 86-97.
(1991b) “The Conservation Ethic [1933],” The River of the Mother of God and Other
Essays by Aldo Leopold, eds. S. L. Flader & J. B. Callicott, Madison, Wisconsin: The University
of Wisconsin Press (1991), pp. 181-192.
(1991c) “The Farmer as a Conservationist [1939],” The River of the Mother of God and
Other Essays by Aldo Leopold, eds. S. L. Flader & J. B. Callicott, Madison, Wisconsin: The
University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 255-65.
(1991d) “The State of the Profession [1940],” The River of the Mother of God and Other
Essays by Aldo Leopold, eds. S. L. Flader & J. B. Callicott, Madison, Wisconsin: The University
of Wisconsin Press, pp. 276-280.
(1991e) “Land-Use and Democracy [1942],” The River of the Mother of God and Other
Essays by Aldo Leopold, eds. S: L. Flader & J. B. Callicott, Madison, Wisconsin: The University
of Wisconsin Press, pp. 295-300.
(1991f) “The Role of Wildlife in a Liberal Education [1942],” The River of the Mother of
God and Other Essays by Aldo Leopold, eds. S. L. Flader & J. B. Callicott, Madison, Wisconsin:
The University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 301-305.
(1991g) “Conservation: In Whole or in Part? [1944],” The River of the Mother of God and
Other Essays by Aldo Leopold, eds. S. L. Flader & J. B. Callicott, Madison, Wisconsin: The
University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 310-319.
(1991h) “Wherefore Wildlife Ecology? [1947],” The River of the Mother of God and
Other Essays by Aldo Leopold, eds. S. L. Flader and J. B. Callicott, The University of Wisconsin
Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 336-37.
(1991i) “The Ecological Conscience [1947],” The River of the Mother of God and Other
Essays by Aldo Leopold, eds. S. L. Flader & J. B. Callicott, Madison, Wisconsin: The University
of Wisconsin Press (1991), pp. 338-346.
(1999) “Planning for Wildlife”, For the Health of the Land, eds. J.B. Callicott & E.T.
FREYFOGLE, Washington: Island Press, pp. 193-198.
REGAN, T. (1985) The Case for Animal Rights, Berkeley: University of California Press.
VARNER, G. E. (1991) “No Holism Without Pluralism” Environmental Ethics vol. 13,
pp. 175-179.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com