You are here

Hâlâ Düşünüyorum

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
According to Descartes, we reach to self-consciousness not through a deduction but through an intuition. The expression “I think (therefore) I am (I exist)” should not be taken as an argument. Considering it as an expression of an intuitive knowledge will be consistent in view of Descartes’ system of thought. That what makes possible to assert that we are conscious of ourselves through intuition is Descartes’ conception of substance according to which, in respect of selfconsciousness, that which thinks, thinking and which is thought are same. Distinctions among them are not real; they are only different in thought.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Descartes’a göre tüm diğer bilgilerin zemininde yer alan ben bilincine türetmeyle değil görüyle ulaşılır. “Düşünüyorum, (o halde) varım (benim)” beyanı, bir argüman olarak ele alınmamalıdır. Bu beyanın, görüsel bir bilginin ifadesi olarak değerlendirilmesi, Descartes’ın düşünce sisteminin bütünü bakımından yerinde olacaktır. Kendi kendisinin bilincine görüyle varılabildiğini öne sürmeyi mümkün kılan ise Descartes’ın cevher anlayışıdır. Buna göre ben bilinci söz konusu olduğunda düşünen, düşünme ve düşünülen aynıdır. Aralarındaki farklar gerçek değildir; sadece düşünce bakımından farklıdırlar.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
19-30

REFERENCES

References: 

BEYSSADE, J.-M. (2008) “Descartes’ ‘I am a Thing that Thinks’ versus Kant’s ‘I
Think’”, Kant and Early Moderns, ed. by Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse, pp. 32-40,
Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
BOYER, A. (2006) “Kant et l’âme de Descartes”, Descartes en Kant, ed. par M. Fichant
& J.–L. Marion, pp. 273-297, Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.
COTTINGHAM, John (1992) The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, ed. by J.
Cottingham, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
COTTINGHAM, John (1996) Descartes Sözlüğü, çev. B. Gözkân, N. Ilgıcıoğlu, A. Çitil,
A. Kovanlıkaya, İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınevi.
DESCARTES, René (1953) Œuvres et Lettres, ed. par A. Bridoux, Paris: Editions
Gallimard.
DESCARTES, René (1959) Lettre à Regius et Remarques sur l’explication de l’esprit
Humain, ed. par G. Rodis-Lewis, Paris: Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin.
DESCARTES, René (1984a) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, tr. and ed.
by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murdoch, Cambridge University Press.
DESCARTES, René (1984b) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 3, tr. and ed.
by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch & Anthony Kenny, Cambridge University Press.
FERRARI, J. (2005) “Kant et la Philosophie Française dès XVIIe
et XVIIIe
siècles”, Les
sources de la philosophie Kantienne XVIIe
et XVIIIe
siècles, ed. par R. Theis & L. K. Sosoe,
pp.15-30, Paris: Libraire Philosophique J.Vrin.
FICHANT, M. & J.–L. Marion (2006) Descartes en Kant, ed. par M. Fichant & J.–L.
Marion, pp. 273-297, Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.
GARBER, Daniel & Béatrice LONGUENESSE (2008) Kant and Early Moderns, ed. by.
Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse, Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
KANT, Immanuel (1990) Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
KANT, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason, tr. and ed. by P. Guyer & A. W.
Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
LONGUENESSE, Béatrice (2006) “Cogito Kantien et Cogito Cartésien”, Descartes en
Kant, ed. par M. Fichant & J.–L. Marion, pp. 241-271, Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.
LONGUENESSE, Béatrice (2008) “Kant’s ‘I Think’ versus Descartes’ ‘I am a Thing that
Thinks’, Kant and Early Moderns, ed. by Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse, pp. 9-31,
Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
THEIS, R. & L. K. SOSOE (2005) Les sources de la philosophie Kantienne XVIIe
et
XVIIIe siècles, ed. par R. Theis & L. K. Sosoe, Paris: Libraire Philosophique J.Vrin.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com