You are here

Home » Content

KÜRESELLEŞME SÜRECİNDE FİRMA DEĞERİ VE YÖNETİM SÜRECİNDEKİ DEĞİŞİMLER

BUSINESS GOODWILL IN THE PROCESS OF GLOBALIZATION AND THE CHANGES WITHIN ADMINISTRATION PROCESS

Journal Name:

  • Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Businesses, in the globalization process which makes capital into an international one , support economic development, come up with new entrepreneurs by creating competitiveness, and causes changes in business goodwill and administration structure, find themselves in the international entrepreneurs by moving away from centralism. Accordingly, this process forces businesses to change. Today, rapid changes provide every kind of businesses with very different opportunities in business world. The changes in customer preferences, the appearance of global products, the developments in technology, communication and data processing, increase job opportunities. Furthermore, they encourage big businesses to create new organization structures which are away from centralism and take the local elements into consideration by leaving the existing ones. Consequently, businesses are trying to adapt the new administration structure and to maximize the business goodwill.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_91826_12_pp_18-26.pdf
  • 1-2
18-26
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. AKGÜÇ, Öztin, Finansal Yönetim, 6. Baskı, Avcıol Basım Yayın, İstanbul, 994.
2. ALDRİCH, Howard E. (1979), Organizations andEnvironments, Englcwood
3. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hail.
4. ANCONA, D.G., Okhuysen, G.A. and Perlovv, L.A. ( 2001) "Taking Time to
5. Integrate Temporal Research", Academy of Management Review, Vol.
6. 26, pp. 512-529.
7. BAUM, J.R. and Wally, S. (2003), "Strategic Decision Speed and Firm
8. Performance", Strategic Management Journal, (in Press).
9. DAMODARAN, Aswath. (2000). Investment valuation second edition. New
10. York: John Wiley&Sons Inc.
11. HARTMAN, Joseph. 2000. “Technical Note- Hartman, Joseph. 2000.“Technical Note- On The Equıvalence of Net Present Value And Market Value Added As Measures of A Project’s.
12. HICKSON, D. , Butler, R., Cray, D.. Mallory, G. and Wilson, D. (1986) Top
13. Decisions: Strategic Decision Making in Organizations, SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.
14. I.Nonaka , “Bilgi Yaratan Şirket”, HBR,Çev.,G.Bulut, Bilgi Yönetimi, MESS Yay.,İst.,1999,s.31.
15. GUAN, J. MA, N. (2003). ‘’Innovative Capability and Export Performance
16. of Chinese Firms’’ Technovation 23.
17. G.Hamel,C.K.Prahalad, Geleceği Kazanmak, Çev.Zülfü Dicleli, İnkilap Yay.,İst.,1996.
18. MORRIS. W.T. (1968) Decentralizalion in Management Systems: An
26 Doğan Kutukiz, Murat Tunçbilek
19. Introduction to Design, Colıımbus: Ohio State University Press.
20. PUGH, D.S., Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R., and Turner, C. (1968) Dimensions of Organizational Structure, Administrative Science Ouarterly, Vol. 13, pp. 65-105.
21. TRACEY, Michael; VONDEREMBSE, Mark A.; LIM, Jeen Su, (1999). ‘’ Manufacturing Technology and Strategy Formulation: Keys to Enhancing Competitiveness and Improving Performance’’, Journal of Operations Management 17.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com