You are here

Bosnia and Herzegovina General Elections, 2010: Analysis of Pre-Election Rhetoric

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Bosnia and Herzegovina, as a postconflict and transitional country with sui generis political system of low efficiency, creates and conducts its politics in a specific ambient of reduced sovereignty and responsibility of domestic institutions and other political subjects. Such political ambient is suitable to proliferation of nationalistic, confrontational and anti-constitutional rhetoric and practices, which reach its peak during period of pre-election campaigns. Unfinished legislative election framework, purposeful obstruction of international election standards and domestic legislative on behalf of most of political subjects, deficiency of professional and independent media, undeveloped civic society, and politicized and undercapacitated institutions which are involved with subject of regularity of the election process, are the reason for lack of candidate's will for constitutional, legislative and ethical behavious during pre-election campaign. Due to this, pre-election campaign of most of political subjects is mainly negative, and not focused on elementary questions of standard of living and priority challenges of state and society (necessary constitutional reforms, Euro-Atlantic integrations, structural economic reforms, unemployment etc.), but on mutual confrontations, stress on big political questions of the status of entities and constituent nations, then on nationalistic rhetorics of negating consitutional and historical facts, and on mutual ungrounded discreditation, which genera-tes atmosphere of fear, national homogenization and searching of the culprit for bad situ-tation in society, inside of other national corpus, and not among own political represent-tatives.



1. Abaspahic, Haris, and Bajrovic, Reuf, (2010). “Perspective of EU policy towards Bosnia and Herzegovina”, EUROAD Initiative, Policy note, Center of policy and governance, Sarajevo, February 2010.
2. Babbie, Earl, (2010). 'The Practice of Social Research', 10th edition, Wadsworth, Thomson Learning Inc., ISBN 0-534-62029-9. p. 530.
3. Besley, Timothy, Robin Burgess, and Prat Andrea, (2002). “Mass Media and Political Accountability”, Department of Economics, London School of Economics, February 28, 2002.
4. Bieber, Florian, (2006). Post-war Bosnia: ethnicity, inequality, and public sector governance, Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Borden, Anthony, (1996), “Bosnia`s Democratic Charade”, in The Nation, September 23, 1996.
6. Election Law, (2010). “Election Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, available at
7. Holsti, Ole R., (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 1969.
8. Kimberly A., Neuendorf, (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 2002.
9. Kuhne, Winlich, (2010). “The Role of Elections in Emerging Democracies and Post-Conflict Countries, Key Issues, Lessons Learned and Dilemmas”, International Policy Analysis, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, August 2010.
10. Lajcak, Miroslav, (2008), “Address to the UN Security Council”, UN, 5/12/2008.
11.Odihr, (2010). “Ured za demokratske institucije i ljudska prava, BiH, Opci izbori, 3. oktobra 2010. Konačni izvještaj Izborne posmatračke misije OSCE/ODIHR-a”, 17 decembar 2010.
12.OSCE, (2010). “Bosnia and Herzegovina: General Elections, 3 October 2010, OSCE/ODIHR Needs Assessment Mission Report, 30 June – 2 July 2010. Warsaw, 27 July 2010.
13. Solioz, Christophe, (2006). „Europäische Integration und die Verfassungsdebatte in Bosnien und Herzegowina: die Rolle des Europarates.“ Südosteuropa Mitteilungen 03, (2006): pp. 97-108.
28 Adis Arapovic, Bedrudin Brljavac
14. SPJ, (2012). “Code of Ethnics”, Society of Professional Journalists, available at

Thank you for copying data from