You are here

Home » Content

acCOMICating Science: Larry Gonick’s ‘Cartoon Guides’ as Models of Science Textbooks in Comics Form

Journal Name:

  • Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article argues for the use of the comics form in science textbooks to address the concerns that Thomas Kuhn (1996), Paul Feyerabend (2002) and Bruno Latour (1987 raise about science education. To effectively address those concerns, this article synthesizes the arguments that each of these philosophers of science address to situate the theoretical perspectives that inform the rest of this article. Afterwards, the article goes on to describe the theoretical perspectives of comics that inform how this form opens the problem of black boxes by showing science in action. Finally, three examples from Larry Gonick‟s (2005) The Cartoon Guide to Physics present the ways in which the comics form can enhance science education. While further research may be needed, this article seeks to lay the groundwork for a science textbook in the comics form that shows (visually) science in action and partially engages students‟ awareness of scientific development, including revolutions and the black boxes of paradigms.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159096_2_pp_1-26.pdf
  • 1
1-26
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Aristotle. (2007). On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. (G. Kennedy, Trans.) New York: Oxford University Press.
Barnes, Emm (2006) “Captain Chemo and Mr Wiggly: Patient Information for Children with Cancer in the Late Twentieth Century.” Social History of Medicine 19(3), 501-519.
Bensaude-Vincent, B. “Textbooks on the Map of Science Studies.” Science and Education 15(7-8), 667-670.
Buckingham, D. & Scanion, M. (2002). Education, Entertainment and Learning in the Home. Maidenhead, Berkshire (UK): Open University Press.
Burke, K. (1969). A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cham, J. PHD Comics: A tranquilizer with graphs in it. (2008, February 22). Retrieved November 7, 2008, from http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=981.
Chambliss, M., & Calfee, R. (1989). “Designing Science Textbooks to Enhance Student Understanding.” Educational Psychologist, 24(3), 307 - 322.
DeBoer, G.E. (2000). “Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(6), 582 - 601.
Eisner, W. (1985). Comics and Sequential Art. Paramus, NJ: Poorhouse Press.
Eisner, W. (1996). Graphic Storytelling and Visual Narrative. Paramus, NJ: Poorhouse Press.
Fahnestock, J. (1986). “Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts.” Written Communication, 3(4), 275 - 296.
Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against Method. New York: Verso.
Gonick, L. "Re: reductionism." Email to Sergio Figueiredo. 11 Sept. 2008
Gonick, L. (2005). The Cartoon Guide to Physics. New York: Collins.
Groensteen, Thierry (2007). The System of Comics. Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi Press.
Kuhn, T. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Locke, S. (2005). “Fantastically reasonable: ambivalence in the representation of science and technology in super-hero comics.” Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), 25 - 46.
McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: HarperCollins.
Mishre, P. (2004). “The Role of Abstraction in Scientific Illustration: Implications for Pedagogy” in Visual Rhetoric in a Digital World: A Critical Sourcebook. Ed. Carolyn Handa. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.
Molotiu, Andrei (2009). Abstract Comics. Seattle: Fantagraphics Books.
Naylor, Stuart & Keogh, B. (1999). “Science on the underground: an initial Evaluation.” Public Understanding of Science 8(2), 105-122.
Perales-Palacios, F.J. & Vilchez-Gonzalez, J.M. (2002). “Teaching physics by means of cartoons: a qualitative study in secondary education.” Physics Education 37(5), 400 - 406.
Solomon, J. (2002). “Science Stories and Science Texts: What can they do for our students?” Studies in Science Education 37, 85-106.
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies
Volume: 2 – Issue: 1 – January - 2012
© Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 26
Sprat, T. (2003). History of the Royal Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.
Wurman, R. (2001). Information Anxiety 2 (Hayden/Que). Indianapolis, IN: Que.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com