Journal Name:
- Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies
Publication Year:
- 2016
Key Words:
Author Name | University of Author |
---|---|
- 4
- English
REFERENCES
Albiniak, P. (2012a). Syndies get social; shows connect with viewers via Pinterest, Tumblr, GetGlue, UStream, others. Broadcasting and Cable.
Albiniak, P. (2012b). No stopping till everyone “likes” Katie; Disney-ABC uses waealth of social media to promote Couric’s new talker .Broadcasting and Cable.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 94-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research – conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. Busselle, R., &Bilandzic, H. (2008).Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement.Communication Theory, 18(2), 255-280.
Cameron, J., &Geidner, N. (2014). Something old, something new, something borrowed from something blue: Experiments on dual viewing TV and Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media
Chung, A. H., & Moyer-Guse, E. (2012).Predicting narrative involvement from social attraction to an actor. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/5/5/5/8...
Ciacu, N., &Tănase, T. (2012).Television in the social media era.Communication & Marketing / Revista De Comunicare Si Marketing, 3(4), 95–107.
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters.Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264.
Cohen, J. (2003). Parasocial breakups: measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication & Society, 6(2), 191–202.
Cohen, J. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: the role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 187–202. doi:10.1177/0265407504041374
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies
Volume: 6 – Issue: 4 October - 2016
© Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 88
Cohen, J. (2006). Audience identification with media characters.Psychology of Entertainment, 183–197.
Cohen, J. (2014). Mediated relationships and social life: Current research in fandom, parasocial relationships, and identification.In M. B. Oliver & A.A. Raney (Eds.), Media and social life (pp. 142-156).New York, NY: Routledge. Eisinga, R., TeGrotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. International journal of public health, 58(4), 637-642.
Giles, D. C. (2002).Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000).The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002).In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion.Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations, 315–341. Green, M. C., & Clark, J. L. (2013). Transportation into narrative worlds: implications for entertainment media influences on tobacco use. Addiction,108(3), 477-484.
Greer, C. F., & Ferguson, D. A. (2011a). Using Twitter for promotion and branding: a content analysis of local television twitter sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(2), 198–214. doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.570824
Greer, C. F., & Ferguson, D. A. (2011b). Following local television news personalities on Twitter: A uses and gratifications approach to social networking. Electronic News, 5(3), 145–157. doi:10.1177/1931243111420405
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
Habibi, M. R., Laroche, M., & Richard, M. (2014). Brand communities based in social media: How unique are they? Evidence from two exemplary brand communities. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 123-132.
Harrison, K. (1997). Does interpersonal attraction to thin media personalities promote eating disorders? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 478-500.
Horton, D., &Wohl, R. R. (1956).Mass communication and para-social interaction.Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
Katz, E., Blumler, J., &Gurevitc.m.(1973). Uses and gratifications research.Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 508–523.
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies
Volume: 6 – Issue: 4 October - 2016
© Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 89
Jain, P., & Slater, M. (2012, May) Deliberative versus non-deliberative evaluations of international-medical-graduate physicians after viewing a medical drama. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
Larsson, A. O. (2013). Tweeting the viewer – Use of Twitter in a talk show context. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 57(2), 135-152.
Lather, J., & Moyer-Guse, E. (2011). How Do We React When Our Favorite Characters Are Taken Away? An Examination of a Temporary Parasocial Breakup.Mass Communication And Society, 14(2), 196-215.
Lin, J. & Peña, J. (2011). Are you following me? A content analysis of TV networks’ brand communication on Twitter.Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), 17–29.
Lee, E.-J., & Jang, J. (2013). Not so imaginary interpersonal contact with public figures on social network sites: how affiliative tendency moderates its effects. Communication Research, 40(1), 27–51. doi:10.1177/0093650211431579
McCroskey, J.S., & McClain, T.A. (1974).The measurement of interpersonal attraction.Speech Monographs, 41(261-266).
McKinney, B. C., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). Narcissism or openness?: College students’ use of Facebook and Twitter. Communication Research Reports, 29(2), 108–118. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.666919
Moyer-Guse, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425.
Moyer-Gusé, E., Chung, A., & Jain, P. (2011).Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health. Journal of Communication,61, 387-406.
Moyer-Guse, E., Jain, P., Chung, A. (2012).Reinforcement or reactance?Examining the effect of an explicit persuasive appeal following an entertainment-education narrative.Journal of Communication, 62(6), 1010-1027.
New Nielsen Research Indicates Two-Way Causal Influence Between Twitter Activity and TV Viewership. (n.d.). Retrieved March 31, 2014, from http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/press-room/2013/new-niels...
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies
Volume: 6 – Issue: 4 October - 2016
© Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 90
Pai, P., & Arnott, D. C. (2013). User adoption of social networking sites: Eliciting uses and gratifications through a means & end approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1039–1053.
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000).Predictors of internet use.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175.
Social Media Update 2013 | Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.(n.d.). Retrieved March 31, 2014, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/
Pynta, P., Seixas, S. a. S., Nield, G. E., Hier, J., Millward, E., & Silberstein, R. B. (2014). The power of social television: can social media build viewer engagement? A new approach to brain imaging of viewer immersion.Journal of Advertising Research, 54(1), 71–80.doi:10.2501/JAR-54-1-071-080
Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Jansz, J., Peters, O., & van Noort, G. (2013). Why girls go pink: Game character identification and game-players’ motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2640-2649. | PersCom
Rubin, A. M. &Perse, E. M. (1987).Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation.Human Communication Research, 14: 246–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
Rubin, A. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratification perspective on media effects. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research. Edited by Jennings Bryant and Mary Beth Oliver, 165–184. New York: Routledge.
Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987).Development of parasocial interaction relationships.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31(3), 279-292.
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37.
Singhal, A. & Rogers, E. M. (2002).A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education.Communication Theory, 12(2): 117-135.
Slater, M. D. (2002). Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives.Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations, 157–181.
Slater, M. D., &Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191.
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies
Volume: 6 – Issue: 4 October - 2016
© Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 91
Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: the mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity.Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
Slater, M.D. (2014). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology,
Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
Toubia, O., & Stephens, O. (2013). Intrinsic versus image related motivations in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Science.
Tully, M., &Ekdale, B. (2014). The team online: entertainment-education, social media, and cocreated messages. Television & New Media, 15(2), 139–156. doi:10.1177/1527476412455952
Wohn, D. Y., &Eun-Kyung, N. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams.First Monday, 16(3), 1.