You are here

Home » Content

TÜRK İŞLETMELERİNİN İNOVASYON PERFORMANSINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

A RESEARCH on THE DETERMİNANTS of INNOVATION PERFORMANCE of TURKISH FIRMS

Journal Name:

  • Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, it is tried to find out the product, process, marketing, and organizational innovation performance of Turkish firms and innovation performance determinants by using the 2012 Innovation Questionnaire data collected by Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK). In this context, after put forward the innovation performance of Turkish firms, the impacts of firm size, proportion of various activities, innovation expenditure of firms in total expenditures, financial support, co-operation arrangements on innovation activities, sources of information, methods for maintaining or increasing the competitiveness, goals, strategies and obstacles in innovative firms on innovation performance of Turkish firms were evaluated.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türk firmalarının ürün, süreç, pazarlama ve organizasyonel inovasyon performansı üzerinde etkili olan faktörler ile Türk firmalarının ürün, süreç, pazarlama ve organizasyonel inovasyon performansını değerlendirmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, öncellikle Türk firmalarının inovasyon performansıyla ilgili detaylı bir literatür taraması yapılmıştır. Daha sonra, TÜİK’in 2010-2012 gözlem dönemini kapsayan ve 2012 yılını referans alan Yenilik-2012 araştırması verileri üzerinden; çeşitli faaliyetleri yürütme oranı, inovasyon faaliyetleri için yapılan harcamalar, finansal destek, bilgi kaynakları, diğer kişi ve kurumlarla işbirliği, rekabetçi gücü koruma ya da artırmada kullanılan yöntemler, amaçlar, stratejiler, engeller ve işletme büyüklüğü değişkenlerinin inovasyon performansı üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-turk-isletmelerinin-inovasyon-performansini-etkileyen-faktorler-uzerine-bir-arastirma.pdf
  • 13
36
63
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Akgün, A.E. ve Keskin, H., (2014). Organisational Resilience Capacity and Firm Product Innovativeness and Performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 6918–6937.
Akova, B., Ulusoy, G., Payzın, E. ve Kaylan, A.R. (1998). New Product Development Capabilities of the Turkish Electronics İndustry. Proceedings of the Fifth International Product Development Management Conference. Como, Italy, 863–876.
Arora, P. (2011). Innovation in Indian Firms: Evidence From the Pilot National Innovation Survey. ASCI Journal of Management, 41(1), 75–90.
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the Capability-Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61-83.
Beneito, P. (2006). The Innovative Performance of in-House and Contracted R&D in Terms of Patents and Utility Models. Research Policy, 35, 502–517.
Bessant, J. ve Tidd, J. (2007). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Burmaoğlu, S. ve Şeşen, H. (2011). Türk Firmalarının Organizasyonel İnovasyon Yeteneğini Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 66(4), 1 – 20.
Ceylan, A. ve Savi, F.Z. (2003). Örgütsel Yaratıcılığı Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İ.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 151-175.
Chung, S. ve Kim, G.M. (2003). Performance Effects of Partnership Between Manufacturers and Suppliers For New Product Development: The Supplier’s Standpoint. Research Policy, 32, 587–603.
Damanpour F. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation. Organization Studies, 13, 375-402.
Damanpour, F. ve Evan, W.M., (1984). Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of Organizational Lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392–409.
Dankbaar. B. (2003). Innovation Management in the Knowledge Economy. Series on Technology Management. V. 7. London: Imperial College Press.
SOBİAD
Kasım 2015 TÜRK İŞLETMELERİNİN İNOVASYON PERFORMANSINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA (s. 36-63)
61
Ecevit Sati, Z. ve Işik, O. (2011). The Synergy of Innovation and Strategic Management: Strategic Innovation. Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 538-559.
Eurostat (2015). Community Innovation Survey 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. ve Nelson, R.R. (2004). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. USA: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London, UK: Frances Pinter.
Friedman, D.D., Landes, W.M. ve Posner, R.A., (1991). Some Economics of Trade Secret Law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 61–72.
Gatignon, H. ve Xuereb, J.M. (1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm New Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (1), 77-90.
Gökmen, A. ve Buğra, A. (2011). Tacit Knowledge and Its Correlation to Innovation and Performance in Obtaining Competitive Advantage: A Study in A Business Operating in The Textile Industry. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 4(7), 19-34.
Grfffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, j. ve Peters, B. (2006). Innovatıon and Productivity Across Four European Countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), 483-498.
Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K. ve Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance. International journal of Production Economics, 133, 662-676.
Hambrick D.C. (1983). Some Tests of the Effectiveness and Functional Attributes of Miles and Snow’s Strategic Types. Academy of Management, 26, 5-26.
Haned, N., Mothe, C. ve Nguyen-Thi, T.U. (2014). Firm Persistence in Technological Innovation: The Relevance of Organizational Innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23, 490-516.
Kotler, P.(1991). Principles of Marketing. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Laursen, K. ve Salter, A. (2005). My Precious: The Role of Appropriability Strategies in Shaping Innovative Performance. DRUID Working Paper, 05-02.
Li, Q., Maggitti, P.G., Smith, K.G., Tesluk, P.E. ve Katila, R. (2013). Top Management Attention to Innovation: The Role of Search Selection and Intensity in New Product Introductions. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 893–916.
Link A.N. ve Siegel D.S. (2007). Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technological Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
OÜSBAD
Kasım 2015 Faruk KALAY – Celal KIZILDERE (s. 36-63)
62
Lopez-Nicolas, C. ve Merono-Cerdan, A.L. (2011). Strategic Knowledge Management, Innovation and Performance. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 502–509.
Martin, S. ve Scott, J.T. (2000). The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation. Research Policy, 29, 437–447.
Miller, D. ve Garnsey, E. (2000). Entrepreneurs and Technology Diffusion: How Diffusion Research Can Benefit from a Greater Understanding of Entrepreneurship. Technology in Society, 22, 445-465.
O’Regan, N., Ghobadian, A. ve Gallear, G. (2005). In Search of the Drivers of High Growth in Manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 26(1), 30–41.
OECD (2005). Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2007). Annual Report 2007, http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/38528123.pdf, erişim tarihi:23.08.2015.
OECD (2000). Science, Technology and Innovation in the New Economy, Policy Brief. Paris: OECD.
Perez-Sebastian, F. (2007). Public Support to Innovation and Imitation in a Non-Scale Growth Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 31, 3791–3821.
Porter, M.E. (1996). What Is Strategy?. Harvard Business Review, (November-December), 61-78.
Sanchez, A., Lago, A., Ferras, X. ve Ribera, J. (2011). Innovation Management Practices, Strategic Adaptation, and Business Results: Evidence from the Electronics Industry. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(2), 14-38.
Tidd J., Bessant, J. ve Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing Innovation Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change. Second Edition. New York: John Wiley&Sons.
Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation Management in Context: Environment, Organization, and Performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 169-183.
TÜİK (2012). Yenilik Araştırması 2012. http://www.tuik.gov.tr.
Ulusoy, G., Günday, G., Kılıç, K. ve Alpkan, L. (2012). Business Strategy and Innovativeness: Results from an Empirical Study. APMS 2012, 685-692.
Ulusoy, G., Kılıç, K., Günday, G. ve Alpkan, L. (2013). What Are The Determinants Leading To Innovation In Manufacturing Firms. Proceedings of the 6th
SOBİAD
Kasım 2015 TÜRK İŞLETMELERİNİN İNOVASYON PERFORMANSINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA (s. 36-63)
63
International Conference for Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development, 98-108, Istanbul.
Un, C.A. ve Montoro-Sanchez, A. (2010). Public Funding For Product, Process and Organizational Innovation in Service Industries. The Service Industries Journal, 30(1), 133–147.
Utterback, J.M. (1994). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Volberda, H.W., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J. ve Heij, C.V. (2013). Management Innovation: Management as Fertile Ground for Innovation. European Management Review, 10, 1–15.
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yeşil, S. ve Büyükbeşe, T. (2013). Exploring the Link Between Knowledge Sharing Enablers, Innovation Capability and Innovation Performance. International Joumal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 1350018-1- 1350018-20.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com