You are here

Home » Content

COĞRAFİ BİLGİ SİSTEMİ VE ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ SÜRECİ İLE JEOTEKNİK YERLEŞİM ALANI UYGUNLUĞUNUN BELİRLENMESİ

DETERMINING SETTLEMENT SUITABILITY BY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS

Journal Name:

  • Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015
DOI: 
10.5505/pajes.2014.40412

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA) covers both data and experience. It is very common to solve the problems with many parameters and uncertainties. Geographic information systems (GIS) supported solutions improve and speed up the decision process. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a MCDA method is employed for solving the geotechnical problems. In this study, geotechnical parameters namely soil type, SPT (N) blow number, shear wave velocity (Vs) and depth of underground water level (DUWL) have been engaged in MCDA and GIS. In terms of geotechnical aspects, the settlement suitability of the municipal area was analyzed by the method. MCDA results were compatible with the geotechnical observations and experience. The method can be employed in geotechnical oriented microzoning studies if the criteria are well evaluated.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bilginin ve tecrübenin çözüme dâhil edildiği çok kriterli karar verme tekniği (ÇKKVT) çok sayıda belirsizlik ve parametre içeren problemlerin çözümünde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu problemler konumsal bilgiler içerdiğinde coğrafi bilgi sistemi (CBS) destekli çözümler karar sürecinin doğruluğunu ve hızını arttırmaktadır. ÇKKV tekniklerinden birisi olan Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) jeoteknik problemlerin çözümünde de kullanılabilir. Bu çalışmada yaygın ve etkin olarak kullanılan jeoteknik parametreler olarak zemin türü, SPT darbe sayısı, kesme dalgası hızı ve yeraltı su seviyesi kriterleri dikkate alınarak ve CBS ile Denizli Belediyesi yerleşim alanı inceleme alanının jeoteknik açıdan yerleşime uygunluğu analiz edilmiştir. ÇKKVT sonuçları yazarların jeoteknik gözlem ve deneyim ile elde edilen sonuçlara uyumlu çıkmıştır. Kriterler doğru değerlendirildiğinde, yöntem jeoteknik amaçlı mikro bölgelendirme çalışmalarında başarılı bir şekilde kullanılabilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cografi-bilgi-sistemi-analitik-hiyerarsi-sureci-ile-jeoteknik-yerlesim-alani-uygunlugunun-belirlenmesi.pdf
  • 6
254
259
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Saaty TL. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory. 1st ed. Pittsburgh, USA, RWS Publications, 2000.
[2] Triantaphyllou E, Sanchez A. “A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for some Deterministic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods”. Decision Sciences, 28(1), 151-194, 1997.
[3] Malczewski J. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Toronto, USA, John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
[4] Kahraman C. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments. Springer, New York, USA, 2008.
[5] Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK. “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches for Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A Literature Review”. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16-24, 2010.
[6] Joerin F, Theriault M, Musy A. “Using GIS and Outranking Multicriteria Analysis for Land-Use Suitability Assessment”. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(2), 153-174, 2001.
[7] Mendoza GA, Martins H. “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Natural Resource Management: A Critical Review of Methods and New Modelling Paradigms”. Forest Ecology and Management, 230(1-3), 1-22, 2006.
[8] Makropoulos CK, Butler D. “Spatial Ordered Weighted Averaging: Incorporating Spatially Variable Attitude towards Risk in Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision-Making”. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(1), 69-84, 2006.
[9] Karnatak HC, Saran S, Bhatia K, Roy PS. “Multicriteria Spatial Decision Analysis in Web GIS Environment”. Geoinformatica, 11, 407-429, 2007.
[10] Greene R, Devillers R, Luther JE, Eddy BG. “GIS-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis”. Geography Compass 5(6), 412-432, 2011.
[11] Moeinaddini M, Khorasani N, Danehkar A, Darvishsefat AA, Zienalyan M. “Siting MSW Landfill Using Weighted Linear Combination and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Methodology in GIS Environment (case study: Karaj)”. Waste Management, 30(5), 912-920, 2010.
[12] Sener S, Sener E, Karagüzel R. “Solid Waste Disposal Site Selection with GIS and AHP Methodology: A Case Study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey”. Environ Monit Assess, 173, 533-554, 2011.
[13] Store R, Kangas K. “Integrating Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Expert Knowledge for GIS-Based Habitat Suitability Modelling”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55(2), 79-93, 2001.
[14] Dai FC, Lee CF, Zhang XH. “GIS-Based Geo-Environmental Evaluation for Urban Land-Use Planning: A Case Study”. Engineering Geology, 61(4), 257-271, 2001.
[15] Kolat Ç, Doyuran V, Ayday C, Süzen ML. “Preparation of a Geotechnical Microzonation Model Using Geographical Information Systems Based on Multicriteria Decision Analysis”. Engineering Geology, 87(3-4), 241-255, 2006.
[16] Akgün A, Bulut F. “GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility for Arsin-Yomra (Trabzon, North Turkey) Region”. Environ Geol, 51, 1377-1387, 2007.
[17] Yalcin A. “GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Bivariate Statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of Results and Confirmations”. Catena, 72(1), 1-12, 2008.
[18] PAU-JEO. “Denizli Belediyesi Yerleşim Alanlarının Jeolojik, Jeoteknik ve Hidrojeolojik Özellikleri Raporu”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli, Türkiye, 2002.
[19] Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1st ed. New York, USA, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
[20] Saaty T. “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281, 1977.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com