You are here

Home » Content

TOPLUMSALLAŞMA VE BİREYSELLEŞME ÇELİŞKİSİNDE “ÖĞRENCİ EVLERİ”

“STUDENT’S RESIDENCES” IN CONTRADICTION BETWEEN SOCIALIZATION AND INDIVIDUALIZATION

Journal Name:

  • Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, Likert attitude scale as a quantitative research method and focus group as a qualitative research method were applied to a group of 8 students in this paper which aims to highlight that students face problems in socialization process in their residences. Content analysis and grounded theory were used together in converting variables achieving from focus group into findings. However, discourse analysis, a qualitative research method, was applied to codes that take place in each three contexts (sentences/paragraphs) both used the least in order to increase the credibility and validity of the variables. One of results of this paper is that students have described their residences in which they come across important problems in domestic personal role division with positive abstractions such as ideal, feeling what I am, freedom atmosphere, maturity and so on.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Öğrencilerin yaşadıkları evlerdeki toplumsallaşma sürecinde karşılaştıkları sorunlara dikkat çeken bu çalışmada, 8 öğrenciden oluşan bir gruba Likert tutum ölçeği nicel araştırma yöntemi ve odak grubu görüşmesi nitel araştırma yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Odak grubu görüşmesinden elde edilen verilerin bulgulara dönüştürülmesinde içerik analizi ve alt teori birlikte kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca, verilerin güvenilir ve geçerliliğini artırmak için hem en fazla hem de en az kullanılan kodların içinde geçtiği her 3 bağlama (cümle/paragraf) söylem analizi nitel araştırma yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarından biri de, öğrencilerin ev içi bireysel rol dağılımında önemli sorunlarla karşılaştıkları bu evleri geri dönüşlü olarak ideal, kendim olabildiğim, özgürlük ortamı, olgunlaşma vb. gibi olumlu soyutlamalarla tanımlamasıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-toplumsallasma-bireysellesme-celiskisinde-ogrenci-evleri.pdf
  • 1
93-112
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alasuutari, P. (1995) Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies, Sage
Publications, London.
Altheide, D. L. (1987) “Ethnographic Content Analysis”, Qualitative Sociology, Volume 10, pp: 65-77.
Arık, A. (1992) Psikolojide Bilimsel Yöntem, İstanbul Üniversitesi Basımevi, İstanbul.
Backman, K. and Kyngas, H. A. (1999) “Challenges of the Grounded Theory Approach to a Novice
Researcher”, Nursing and Health, Volume 1, pp: 147-153.
Baş, T. ve Akturan, U. (2008) Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Seçkin Kitabevi, Ankara.
Berg, B. L. (2004) Qualitative Research Methods For The Social Sciences, Pearson, Boston.
Creswell, J. W. (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, SAGE Publications, Oaks.
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990) “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative
Criteria”, Qualitative Sociology, Volume 13, pp: 3-21.
Cutcliffe, J. R. (2000) “Methodological Issues in Grounded Theory”, Journal of Advanced Nursing,
Volume 13, pp: 1476-1484.
Flick, U. (1998) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, (Çev. G. A. Altay), Sage, London
Glaser, B. G. (2002) “Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory”, International
Journal of Qualitative Methods, Volume 1, pp: 1-33.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. L. (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative
Research, Adline, Chicago.
Gubrium, J. F. (1988) Analyzing Field Reality, Sage Publications, Newbury.
Hogg and Vaughan (2006) Sosyal Psikoloji, (Çev. İ. Yıldız ve A. Gelmez), Ütopya Yayınevi, Ankara.
İnal, A. (1995) Yazılı Basın Haberlerinde “Yapısallık” Yanlılık Sorunu, Toplum ve Bilim Dergisi, Ankara.
Lee, T. W. (1999) Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Sage Publications, Oaks.
Marshall, C. (2006) Designing Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Oaks.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005) Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, Sage Publications, Oaks.
Miller, G. (1997) Context and Method in Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, London, Oaks.
Morgan, D. L. (1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Newbury.
Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications, Oaks.
Parry, K. W. (1998) “Grounded Theory and Social Process: A New Direction for Leadership Research”,
Leadership Quarterly, Volume 9, pp: 85-105.
Phillips, N. (2002) Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction, Sage
Publications, Oaks.
Punch, K. (1998) Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative And Qualitative Approach, SAGE
Publications, London.
Tavşancıl, E. ve Aslan, E. (2001) İçerik analizi ve Uygulama Örnekleri, Epsilon yayıncılık, İstanbul.
Wellington, J. J. (2007) Research Methods for The Social Sciences, Continuum International
Publications, London.
Tavish, D. G. and Pirro, E. B. (1990) Contextual Content Analysis, Quality and Quantity, Volume 24,
pp: 245-268.
Weber, R. P. (1985) Basic Content Analysis, Sage, Beverly Hills.
Wolcoott, H. F. (1994) Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis, and Interpretation,
Sage, Newbury.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com