You are here

Home » Content

CEZA ALGISININ UYUŞTURUCU KULLANIMI ÜZERİNDEKİ CAYDIRICI ETKİSİ: BURSA İLİ ORTAÖĞRETİM KURUMLARINDA YAPILAN BİR ALAN ARAŞTIRMASI

The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Punishment on Illicit Drug Use: A Field Study in High Schools of Bursa

Journal Name:

  • Polis Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Deterrence theory has been a highly influential criminological perspective on the criminal justice systems in the world, particularly in the USA and European countries for the last two hundred years. Despite many international studies on validity of the deterrence theory, there is a lack of empirical research in Turkey. With this study, we aimed to test deterrence theory with its certainty, severity, and swiftness components through a survey on a sample of 500 high school students from Bursa to see whether deterrence based school policies have any impact on illicit drug use among these students. The results of the multiple logistic regression analysis showed that there is a negative relationship between perceived high probability of the detection of a drug user by the school administration and substance use. In other words, the most important factor that keeps students away from drug use is the high probability of detection by the school administration. Further, the findings revealed that female students are less likely than males, and students of high risk schools, which were identified as having a rate of violence, non disciplinary behaviors and criminal incidents, are more likely than students of lesser risk schools to use illicit drugs. In conclusion, several policy implications are suggested regarding illegal drug use in schools.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Son iki yüz yılda ABD ve Avrupa ülkeleri başta olmak üzere dünyanın pek çok ülkesinin geçerli ceza adalet sistemleri üzerinde etkili olmuş önemli bir kriminolojik görüş olan caydırıcılık teorisinin geçerliliğine ilişkin yapılan pek çok uluslararası araştırmaya rağmen, Türkiye’de bu konu ampirik çalışmalara konu olmamıştır. Bu çalışma ile caydırıcılık teorisinin kesinlik, şiddetlilik ve hızlılık ilkeleri çerçevesinde Bursa ilinde lise öğrenimine devam etmekte olan toplam 500 öğrenci üzerinde bir anket uygulanmış ve cezaların uyuşturucu kullanımı üzerindeki caydırıcı bir etkisinin olup olmadığı test edilmiştir. Çoklu lojistik regresyon analizi sonuçları, uyuşturucu madde kullanan birisini okul idaresinin fark etme olasılığının yüksek olduğuna ilişkin kanaat ile madde kullanımı arasında negatif bir ilişkinin olduğunu göstermiştir. Yani, öğrencileri uyuşturucu madde kullanmaktan uzaklaştıran en önemli faktör okul yönetiminin bu durumdan haberdar olması çıkmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları ayrıca, kız öğrencilerin erkek öğrencilerden daha az uyuşturucu kullanma olasılığının olduğunu; disiplinsiz davranışların, suç ve şiddet olaylarının yüksek olduğu okullarda bulunan öğrencilerin de diğer okullarda bulunan öğrencilere göre uyuşturucu kullanma oranının daha yüksek olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Makalenin sonuç bölümünde araştırma bulgularının okullarda suç ve madde kullanımıyla mücadele noktasında işaret ettiği bir takım öneriler sıralanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ceza-algisinin-uyusturucu-kullanimi-uzerindeki-caydirici-etkisi-bursa-ili-ortaogretim-kurumlarinda-yapilan-bir-alan-arastirmasi.pdf
  • 4
1-26
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Aldrich, John H. ve Nelson, Forrest D., (1984), Linear Probability, Logit,
and Probit Models, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.
Series/Number: 45, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Bailey, William C., (1976), “Certainty of Arrest and Crime Rates for
Major Felonies: A Research Note”, Journal of Research in Crime and
Delinquency, (July), pp.145-154.
Beccaria, Cesare, (2003), Suçlar ve Cezalar, 1.baskı, Çev. Zuhal
Özbayrak, Başak Matbaacılık, Ankara.
Berry, William D. ve Feldman, Stanley, (1985), Multiple Regression in
Practice, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series/
Number: 50, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Bridges, George S. ve James A. Stone, (1986), “Effect of Criminal Punishment
on Perceived Threat of Punishment: Toward an Understanding
of Specific Deterrence”, Journal of Research ın Crime and Delinquency,
Vol.23, No.3, (August), pp.207-239.
Dolu, Osman ve Büker, Hasan, (2009), “Caydırıcılığın Sınırları: Caydırıcılık
Eksenli Suç Önleme ve Mücadele Politikalarına Eleştirel Bir
Yaklaşım”, Polis Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 11, Sayı 3, ss.1-22.
Dolu, Osman, (2009), “Rasyonel Bir Tercih Olarak Suç: Klasik Okul
Düşüncelerinin Suçu Açıklama ve Önleme Kapasitesinin Değerlendirilmesi”,
Polis Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 11, Sayı 4, ss.89-120.
Dolu, Osman, (2011), Suç Teorileri: Teori, Araştırma ve Uygulamada
Kriminoloji, 3. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
Erickson, Maynard L.; Jack P. Gibbs ve Gary F. Jensen, (1977), “The
Deterrence Doctrine and the Perceived Certainty of Legal Punishments”,
American Sociological Review, Vol.42, (April), pp.305-317.
Grasmick, Harold G. ve George J. Bryjak, (1980), “The Deterrent Effect
of Perceived Severity of Punishment”, Social Forces, Vol.59:2, (December),
pp.471-491.
Greenberg, David F. ve Ronald C. Kessler, (1982), “The Effect of Arrests
on Crime: A Multivariate panel Analysis”, The University of North
Carolina Press, pp.771-790.
Greenberg, David F; Ronald C. Kessler ve Charles H. Logan, (1979), “A
Panel Model of Crime Rates and Arrest Rates”, American Sociological
Review, Vol.44, (October), pp.843-850.
Gül, Serdar Kenan, (2009), “An Evaluation of the Rational Choice
Theory in Criminology”, Girne American University Journal of Social
and Applied Science, Vol.4, No.8, pp.36-44, http://www.gau.edu.tr/
PDF-Files/JSAS_004_08/JSAS_004_08_2_ Gul.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi
02.03.2011).
Hardy, Melissa A., (1993), Regression with Dummy Variables. Quantitative
Applications in the Social Sciences, Series/Number: 93. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Horney, Julie ve Marshall, Ineke Haen, (1992), “Risk Perceptions among
Serious Offenders: The Role of Crime and Punishment”, Criminology,
Vol.30, No.4, pp.575-594.
Kızmaz, Zahir, (2006), “Ceza veya Kriminal Yaptırımın Suç Oranları
Üzerindeki Caydırıcı Etkisi”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler
Dergisi, Cilt 7, Sayı 2, ss.210-231.
Kızmaz, Zahir, (2007), “Cezaevinin ve Hapsetmenin Suçu Engellemedeki
Etkisi”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı 17,
ss.44-68.
Lewis, John A., (2006), “An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis of Pennsylvania’s
Zero-Tolerance Juvenile Alcohol Law”, A Dissertation
Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial
Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy,
Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Liao, Tim F., (1994), Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and
Other Generalized Linear Models, Quantitative Applications in the
Social Sciences. Series/Number:101, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Inc.
Meier, Robert F. ve Johnson, Weldon T., (1977), “Deterrence as Social
Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of Conformity”, American
Sociological Review, Vol.42, No.2, (April), pp.292-304.
Nagin, Daniel S. ve Pogarsky, Greg, (2001), “Integrating Celerity, Impulsivity,
and Extralegal Sanction Threats into A Model of General Deterrence:
Theory and Evidence”, Criminology, Vol.39, No.4, pp.865-
890.
Nagin, Daniel S. ve Paternoster, Raymond, (1991), “The Preventive Effects
of the Perceived Risk of Arrest: Testing an Expanded Conception
of Deterrence”, Criminology, Vol.29, No.4, pp.561-587.
Paternoster, Raymond; Saltzman, Linda E.; Waldo, Gordon P. ve Chiricos,
Theodore G., (1985), “Assessments of Risk and Behavioral Experience:
An Exploratory Study of Change”, Criminology, Vol.23,
No.3, pp.417-436.
Paternoster, Raymond ve Alex Piquero, (1995), “Reconceptualizing Detternce:
An Empirical Test Personal and Vicarious Experiences”, Journal
of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol.32, No.3, (August),
pp.251-286.
Paternoster, Raymond ve Leeann Iovanni, (1986), “The Deterrent Effect
of Perceived Severity: A reexamination”, North Carolina Press,
pp.751-777.
Paternoster, Raymond; Saltzman, Linda E.; Waldo, Gordon P. ve Chiricos,
Theodore G., (1983), “Estimating Perceptual Stability and Deterrent
Effects: The Role of Perceıved Legal Punishment İn The Inhibition
of Criminal Involvement”, The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology,
Vol.74, No.1, pp.270-297.
Paternoster, Raymond; Saltzman, Linda E.; Waldo, Gordon P. ve Chiricos,
Theodore G., (1983), “Perceived Risk And Social Control: Do
Sanctions Really Deter?”, Law& Society Review, Vol.17, No.3,
pp.457-479.
Paternoster, Raymond; Saltzman, Linda E.; Chiricos, Theodore G. ve
Waldo, Gordon P., (1982), “Perceptual Deterrence Research”, The
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Northwestcin University
School of Law PrmUdin L .S.A., pp.1238-1258.
Pogarsky, Greg; Piquero, Alex R. ve Paternoster, Ray, (2004), “Modeling
Change in Perceptions about Sanction Threats: The Neglected Linkage
in Deterrence Theory”, Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
Vol.20, No.4, (December), pp.343-369.
Pogarsky, Greg; Alex R. Piquero, (2003), “Can Punishment Encourage
Offending? Investigating the “Resetting” Effect”, Journal of Research
in Crime and Delinquency, Vol.40, No.1, (February), pp.95-120.
Pogarsky, Greg; KiDeuk Kim ve Ray Paternoster, (2005), “Perceptual
Change in the National Youth Survey: Lessons for Deterrence Theory
and Offender Decision-Making”, Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences
Justice Quarterly, Vol.22, No.1, (March), pp.1-29.
Richard, Pamela ve Charles R. Tittle, (1982), “Socioeconomic Status and
Perceptions of Personal Arrest Probabilities”, Criminology, Vol.20,
No.3-4, (November), pp.329-346.
Richard, Pamela ve Charles R. Tittle, (1981), “Gender and Perceived
Chances of Arrest”, The University of North Carolina Press, pp.1182-
1199.
Saltzman, Linda; Raymond Paternoster; Gordonp Waldo ve Theodore G.
Chiricos, (1982), “Experiential Effects: The Problem of Causal Order
in Perceptual Deterrence Research”, Journal of Research in Crime
and Delinquency, (July), pp.172-189.
Teevan, James J., (1976), “Subjective Perception of Deterrence”, Journal
of Research in Crime and Delinquency, (July), pp.155-164.
Waldo, Gordon P. ve Theodore G. Chiricos, (1972), “Perceived Penal
Sanction and Self Reported Criminality: A Neglected Approach to
Deterrence Research”, Social Problems, Vol.19, No.4, (Spring),
pp.522-540.
Williams, Kirk R. ve Richard Hawkins, (1986), “Perceptual Research on
General Deterrence: A Critical Review”, Law & Society Review,
Vol.20, No.4, pp.545-572.
Wooldridge, Jefferey M., (2003), Introduction to Econometrics: A Modern
Approach, Mason, OH: South-Western, a division of Thomson
Learning.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com