You are here

Home » Content

KURUMSAL VE TEKNİK ÇEVRE AYRIMINDA YÖNETİM KURULU FONKSİYONU VE YAPISI: KURAMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVE

BOARD FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE IN THE DINSTINCTION OF INSTITUTIONAL AND TECHNICAL ENVIRONMENT: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Journal Name:

  • Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this research is to investigate the function and the structure of the board within technical and institutional organizational environment distinction. In strategic management literature, various contingencies of board structure have been documented. This research puts forward technical and institutional environment distinction as an antecedent of board function and structure. This research bases its arguments on contingency theory, institutional theory and resource dependence. As a result ,this research puts forward propositions and a model to show how the technical and institutional environment affects the board function and structure.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın amacı, kurumsal çevre ve teknik çevre ayrımında yönetim kurulu fonksiyonu ve yapısını incelemektir. Stratejik yönetim yazınında yönetim kurulu yapısı ve demografisi ile ilgili birçok farklı koşulbağımlılıklar ortaya konulmuştur. Bu araştırma ise teknik çevre ve kurumsal çevre ayrımını ve yönetim kurulu fonksiyonu ve yapısının belirleyicisi olarak öne sürmektedir. Bu araştırma tartışmalarını, koşulbağımlılık kuramına, kurumsal kurama ve kaynak bağımlılığı kuramına dayandırmıştır. Sonuç olarak da teknik çevre ve kurumsal çevrenin yönetim kurulu fonksiyonu ve yapısını nasıl ve ne şekilde etkilediğine ilişkin öneriler ve bir model ortaya konulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kurumsal-teknik-cevre-ayriminda-yonetim-kurulu-fonksiyonu-yapisi-kuramsal-bir-cerceve.pdf
  • 1
127-144
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Boeker, W. ve Goodstein, J. 1991. Organizational performance and
adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in
board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 805-826.
34
Daily, C. ve Dalton, D. 1993. Board of directors leadership and structure:
Control and performance implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and
Practice. 17: 65-81.
Daily, C. M. 1996 Governance patterns in bankruptcy organizations,
Strategic Management Journal, 17: 355-375.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., Johnson, J. L. 1998. Metaanalytic
reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and
financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 269-290.
Dalton, D. ve Kesner, I. 1983. Inside/outside succession and organizational
size: The pragmatics of executive replacement. Academy of
Management Journal, 26: 736-742.
DiMaggio, P. J. ve Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional
isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American
Sociological Review 48(2): 147-160 36
Donaldson, Lex. 1995. American anti-management theories of
organizations: a critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Fennel,M,E. ve Alexander,J,A. 1987.Organizational boundary spanning in
institutionalized environments.Academy of Management Journal.
30(3): 456-476.
Forbes, D. & Milliken, F. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance:
Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups.
Academy of Management Review, 24: 489-505.
Goodstein, ,J.,Gautnam,K., Boeker,W. 1994. The effects of board size and
diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal.
15(3):241-250.
Hirsch,P,M. 1975. Organizational effectiveness and the institutional
environment. Administrative Science Quarterly. 20(3): 327-344.
Huse, M. 1990 Board composition in small enterprises, Entrepreneurship
& Reg ional Development, 2: 363- 373.
Huse, M. 2000. Boards of directors in SMEs: A review and research
agenda. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12: 271-290.
Kerr, N,L. Ve Tindale,R,S.2004. Group performance and decision making.
Annual Review of Psychology. 55:623-655.
AKTAŞ
143
Kesner,I,F.1988. Directors' characteristics and committee membership: An
investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender.Academy of
Management Journal.31(1): 66-84.
Li,J.1994. Ownership structure and board composition: A multi-country test
of agency theory predictions. Managerial and Decision Economics.
15(4): 359-368.
Luoma, P. and Goodstein, J. 1999. Stakeholders and corporate boards:
institutional influences on board composition and structure, Academy of
Management Journal, 42: 553- 563.
Lynall, M,D., Golden,B,R.,Hillman,A,J. 2003. Board composition from
adolesence to maturity. Academy of Management Review,28(3): 416-
431.
Meyer J. W. & Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal
structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83:
340-63
Milliken, F. J. and Martin, L. L. 1996. Searching for common threads:
understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups,
Academy of Management Review, 21: 402-433.
Osborn,R,N.ve Hunt,J,G.1974. Environment and organizational
effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly. 19 (2):231-246.
Palmer, D, A. Ve Biggart, N, W.2002. Organizational
institutions.Joel,A,C.Baum (Der) The Blackwell Companion to
Organizations. Oxford:Blackwell, 259,280.
Pearce, J. A. and Zahra, S. A. 1991 The relative power of CEOs and
boards of directors: associations with corporate performance, Strategic
Management Journal, 12: 135-153.
Pearce, J. A. ve Zahra, S. A 1991. The relative power of CEOs and Boards
of Directors: associations with corporate performance. Strategic
Management Journal, 12(2): 135- 153.
Pettigrew, A. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management
Journal, 13: 163-183. 40
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A
Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Pfeffer, J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 218-228.
Pfeffer, J. 1973 Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of
directors: a study of organization environmental linkages,
Administrative Science Quarterly, 18: 349-364.
Scott, W. R. 1992.Organizations Rational Natural and Open Systems.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
AKTAŞ
144
Smith, K,G.,Mitchell,G,R., Summer,C,E. 1985. Top level management
priorities in different stages of organizational life cycle. Academy of
Management Journal. 28(4):799-820.
Tolbert, P. S. 1985. Institutional environments and resource dependence:
Sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher learning.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 1-13.
Üsdiken, B. 2006. Kaynak Bağımlılığı Kuramı. A.S. Sargut ve Ş. Özen (Der).
Örgüt Kuramları,Ankara,İmge
Yıldırım, Ö ve Üsdiken, B. 2005. Boards of directors in firms within family
business groups: Evidence from Turkish ‘Holding’ companies. 21.
EGOS Kollokyumu, Berlin, 30 Haziran-2 Temmuz 2005.
Zajac, E. J. & Westphal, J. D. 1996. Who shall succed? How CEO/Board
preferences affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management
Journal, 39:64-90.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com