You are here

Home » Content

Alveol yarıldı hastaların operasyon öncesi ve sonrası dönemde periapikal ve oklüzal grafi ile değerlendirilmesi

Determination ofpatients wrth alveol clefts by periapical and odussal graphies at pre operative and post operative period.

Journal Name:

  • Selçuk Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: Purpose of this study was to use imaging methods which is cheaper and offering less radiation dousage Instead of Computarized Tomography (CTj vvhich is more expensive and higher radiation dousage for determination of alveol clefts. For this purpose, peraplcal and oclussal plane X-rays are used in this study, which are vvidely used by dentists for diagnosis of dental pathologies. Patients and Methods: Eleven patients wlth unilateral alveol clefts was operated with seconder otogen illac and allogenic cansellous bone grafts between 1998 and 2004. Bone defects was measured by NetCAD program vvith periapical and oclussal graphies pre operatively Bone wax was used for per operative measurement and real size has been obtained. Late period control graphies was obtained with the same rontgenograms betvveen post operative 6 months and I year. Lost bone volume and ossification were determined. Result We think that periapical and oclussal graphies are easier procedures and may be used Instead of CT for follovv up in alveol clefts. Addditional advantages are exposure to lower doses of radiation and low prices.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Anaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, alveol yarıklarının takibinde sık kullanılan pahalı ve radyasyon dozu yüksek olan bilgisa¬yarlı tomografi (BTj yerine daha ucuz ve daha az radyasyon veren görüntüleme yöntemleri kullanmaktır. Bunun için diş hekimleri tarafından dental patolojilerin tanısında sık kullanılan periapikal ve oklüzal grafi kullanıldı. Hastalar ve metod: 1998 - 2004 yıllan arasında "tek taraflı alveol yarığı" olan 11 hasta otojen iliak ve ailojenik kansetlöz kemik grefti ile öpere edilmiştir. Preoperatif kemik defektler periapikal ve oklüzal grafiler çekilerek NetCAD programı ile belirlendi. Peroperatifkemik mumu ile yeniden defekt ölçümü yapı/arak gerçek değer bulundu. Postoperatif 6 ay-l yıl süresinde aynı grafîlerle geç kontrol filmleri alındı ve kemik kaybı yüzde (%) olarak ve etraf dokularla olan ossifikasyonu değerlendirildi. Sonuç: Uygulamanın kolay olması, özellikle çocukların daha az radyasyon almaları ve ekonomik olması nedeniyle alveol yanklannın takibinde BTyerine periapikal ve oklüzal grafi kullanılabileceği kanaatindeyiz.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-alveol-yarildi-hastalarin-operasyon-oncesi-sonrasi-donemde-periapikal-okluzal-grafi-ile-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 1
11-16
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Tai CC, Sutherland İS, McFadden L Prospectrve analysis of secondary alveolar bone graftıng using computed tomography J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:1241-9.
2. Boyne PJ. Sands NR. Secondary bone grafting of resid-ual alveolar and palatal clefts J Oral Surg 1972;30:87-91.
3. Hogan l_ Shand M, Heggie AA Kilpatrick N. Canine eruprion inro grafted alveolar clefts: a retrospectrve study. AusrDenrJ. 2003,48:119-24.
4. Robertson NR, Jolleys A An I l-year follow-up of the effects of early bone grafting in infants born with com-plete clefts of the lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg 1983;36:438-43.
5. McCarthy JG, Cutting CB. Sekondary deformities of cleft lıp and palate. İn Georgiade GS, Georgiade NG, Riefkohl R, Barvvick WJ. Textbook of Plastıc, Maxillofacial and Reconstructive Surgery. Maryland, USA: Williams &Wilkins; 1992: 312.
6. Ghristiansen EL, Moore RJ, Thompson JR, Hasso AN, Hinshavv DB Jr. Radiation dose in radiography, CT, and arthrography of the temporomandibular joint. AJR 1987,148:107-9.
7 Conway BJ, McCrohan JL Antonsen RG, Rueter FG, Slayron RJ, Suleiman OH. Average radiation dose in Stan¬dard CT examinarjons of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey. Radıology 1992;184:135-40.
8. Bradrick JP, Smith AS, Ohman JC, Indresano AT. Estimation of maxillary alveolar cleft volume by three-dımensional CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14; 994¬6.

9. Bayırlı G. Röntgen ışınları ve dışhekimligınde uygula¬malar. İstanbul: I.Ü. Dışhek Fak. Yayınlan; 1994; 85-183
10 Richard NB The sensıtıvıty. specıfity. and relıabılıry of radı-ographic periapical dıagnosıs of postenor teeth. Oral surg oral med oral pathol 2000;89:639-42.
1 1. Boyne PJ, Christiansen EL, Thompson JR. Advanced imag-ing of osseous maxillary clefts. Radiol Clin North Am 1993;31:195-207.
12. Botel U, Fleıner B. Steckeler S. Harvesting ılıac crest bone spans in 1 72 maxillary cleft repairs: a retrospeaıve study Fortschr kiefer Ges/chtschir 1993;38:123-5.
13. van der Meij AW. BaartJA PrahlAndersen B, Kostense PJ, van der Sijp JR, Tuinzing DB. Outcome of bone grafting in relation to cleft width in unilateral cleft lıp and palate patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003,96:19-25.
14. Troxell JB, Fonseca RJ. Osbon DB. A retrospective study of alveolar cleft grafting. J Oral Maxıllofac Surg 1982,40:721-5.
15. Bertz JE. Bone grafting of alveolar clefts. J Oral Surg 1981;39:874-7.
16. Thaller SR, Patel M, 2immerman T, Feldman M. Percutaneous iliac bone grafting of secondary alveolar clefts. J Craniofac Surg 1991,2:135-9.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com