You are here

Kafa Travma Modelinde Mannitol veya Hipertonik Salin Solüsyonlarının Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Comparison of The Effects of Mannitol or Hypertonic Saline Solutions in Head Trauma Model

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
We aimed to compare the effects of 20 % mannitol, 3 % or 7 % hypertonic saline on hemodynamic parameters, intracranial pressure and electroencephalography in experimental head trauma. Bilateral craniotomy were carried out in the parietal region and standart head trauma was applied for all rabbits. The rabbits were randomly divided into four groups. In group I rabbits were only observed. In group II: 20 % mannitol, in group III: 3 % hypertonic saline and in group IV: 7 % hypertonic saline was administered intravenously to achieve similar osmolar load. Electroencephalography, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, intracranial pressure were recorded before trauma and 5 and 60 minutes after trauma. Increased intracranial pressure was significantly decreased by mannitol, 3 % and 7 % hypertonic saline solutions at the end of study (p<0.05). But intracranial pressure values of mannitol and 7 % hypertonic saline groups were lower than the other groups (p<0.05). The electroencephalography scores decreased after trauma in all groups (p<0.05). At end of the study, 3 % and 7 % hypertonic saline groups had similar electroencephalography scores with pretrauma scores (p>0.05). The mean arterial pressure and heart rates increased after trauma in all groups (p<0.05). Mean arterial pressure values were found lower only in mannitol group at end of the study (p<0.05). Our study showed that when used in intracranial hypertension treatment, 7 % hypertonic saline solution is as effective as mannitol, and preserves hemodynamic parameters, and normalizes traumatic electroencephalography abnormalities better than mannitol.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Deneysel kafa travmasında, % 20 mannitol, % 3 veya % 7 hipertonik salin solüsyonlarının, hemodinamik parametrelere, intrakraniyal basınca ve elektroensefalografi üzerine olan etkilerini karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Bütün tavşanlara pariyetal bölgeden bilateral kraniotomi yapılarak standart kafa travması uygulandı. Rastgele 4 gruba ayrılan deneklerden; I. gruba tedavi uygulanmazken, II. gruba % 20’lik mannitol, III. gruba % 3’lük hipertonik salin ve IV. gruba % 7’lik hipertonik salin eşdeğer osmolar yükte intravenöz uygulandı. Travmadan önce, travmadan 5 ve 60 dakika sonra; elektroensefalografi, ortalama arter basıncı, kalp atım hızı ve intrakraniyal basınç kayıtları alındı. Mannitol, % 3 ve % 7’lik hipertonik salin solüsyonları intrakraniyal basınçdaki yükselmeyi çalışmanın sonunda düşürdü (p<0.05). Fakat intrakraniyal basınç değerleri, mannitol ve % 7’lik hipertonik salin gruplarında, diğer gruplardan daha düşüktü (p<0.05). Elektroensefalografi skorları tüm gruplarda travmadan sonra düştü (p<0.05). Çalışma sonunda % 3 ve % 7’lik hipertonik salin grupları, travma öncesine benzer elektroensefalografi skorlarına sahipti (p>0.05). Ortalama arter basınç ve kalp atım hızı, bütün gruplarda travmadan sonra yükseldi (p<0.05). Çalışmanın sonunda, ortalama arter basıncı sadece mannitol grubunda düşük bulundu (p<0.05). Çalışmamız intrakraniyal hipertansiyonun tedavisinde % 7 hipertonik salin solüsyonunun; mannitol kadar etkili olduğunu, mannitole göre hemodinamik parametreleri daha iyi koruduğunu, travmaya bağlı gelişen elektroensefalografi anormalliklerini de daha iyi düzelttiğini gösterdi.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
1-5

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Bullock R, Word JD. Management of Head Trauma. In: Shoemaker W,
Ayress S, Grenvick A (eds). Textbook of Critical Care. Third Edition. W. B.
Saunders Company; 1995, 1449-56.
2. Shafi S, Diaz AR, Madden C, Gentilello L. Intracranial pressure monitoring
in brain-injured patients is associated with worsening of survival. J Trauma
2008; 64: 335-40
3. Forsyth LL, Liu-De RX, Parker D, Rhoney DH. Role of hypertonic saline
for the management of intracranial hypertension after stroke and traumatic
brain injury. Pharmacotherapy 2008;28: 469-84
4. Feeney DM, Boyeson MG, Linn RT, Murray HM, Dail WG. Responses to
cortical injury: I. Methodology and local effects of contusions in the rat.
Brain Res 1981;211: 67-77.
5. Öğün CÖ, Üstün ME, Duman A, Gürbilek M, Genç BO. Correlation between
tissue lactate levels and electroencephalogram in evaluating the severity of
experimental head trauma. Crit Care Med 2002;9: 30-6.
6. Houlden DA, Li C, Schwartz ML, Katic M. Median nerve somatosensory
evoked potentials and the Glaskow coma scale as predictors of outcome in
comatose patients with head injuries. Neurosurg 1990;27: 701-7.
7. Üstün ME, Gürbilek M, Ak A, Vatansev H, Duman A. Effects of magnesium
sulfate on tissue lactate and malondialdehyde levels in experimental head
trauma. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 264-8.
8. Biros MH. Experimental head trauma models: a clinical perspective.
Resuscitation 1991;22: 283-93.
9. Berger S, Schurer L, Hartl R, Messmer K, Baethmann A. Reduction of post
– traumatic intracranial hypertension by hypertonic, hyperoncotic saline /
dextran and hypertonic mannitol. Neurosurg 1995;37: 98-107.
10. Qureshi AI, Wilson DA, Traystman RJ. Treatment of elevated intracranial
pressure in experimental intracerebral hemorragie: Comparison between
mannitol and hypertonic saline. Neurosurg 1999;5: 1055-63.
11. Gemma M, Cozzi S, Piccoll S, et al. Hypertonic saline fluid therapy following
brain stem trauma. J Neurosurg Anesth 1996;8: 137- 41.
12. Chesnut RM. Avoidance of hypotension: Conditio sine qua non of successful
severe head injury management. J Trauma 1997; 42: 4-9.
13. Kokoska ER, Smith GS, Pittman T, Weber TR. Early hypotension worsens
neurological outcome in pediatric patients with moderately severe head
trauma. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33:333-8.
14. Pigula FA, Wald SL, Shackford SR, Vane DW. The effect of hypotension
and hypoxia on children with severe head injuries. J Pediatr Surg 1993; 28:
310-6.
15. Schroder ML, Muilezaar JP, Kuta AJ. Documented reversal of global
ischemia immediately after removal of an acute subdural hematoma.
Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 1994;80: 324-7.
16. Graham DI. The pathology of brain ischemia and possibilites for threapeutic
intervention. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 3-17.
17. Ito J, Marmarau A, Barzao P, Fatouros P, Corwin F. Characterization of
edema by diffusion–weighted imaging in experimental traumatic brain
injury. J Neurosurg 1996; 84: 97-103.
18. Riou B, Carli P. Hypertonic sodium chloride and hemorrhagic shock. Ann Fr
Anesth Reanim 1990; 9: 536-46.
19. Walsh JC, Zhuang J, Shackford SR. A comparison of hypertonic to isotonic
fluid in the resuscitation of brain injury and hemorrhagic shock. J Surg Res.
1991; 50: 284-92.
20. Gunnar W, Jonasson O, Merlotti G, Stone J, Barrett J. Head injury and
hemorrhagic shock: studies of the blood brain barrier and intracranial
pressure after resuscitation with normal saline solution, %3 saline solution
and dextran 40. Surgery 1988;103:398-407.
21. Gunnar W, Merlotti G, Barrett J, Jonasson O. Resuscitation from
hemorrhagic shock: Alterations of the intracranial pressure after normal
saline, %3 saline and dextran 40. Ann Surg 1986;204:686-92.
22. Kane NM, Moss TH, Curry SH, Butler SR. Quantitative
electroencephalograpic evaluation of non-fatal and fatal traumatic coma.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;106:244-50.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com