You are here

Home » Content

Yenilik (Innovation) ve İcat (Invention) Kavramları Arasındaki İlişki: Metaforlarla Keşfedici Bir Araştırma

Relationship between Innovation and Invention: An Explorative Investigation Though Metaphors

Journal Name:

  • Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study which focus on the innovation concept as an intersection of science and business, is constructed on the question of what are the perspectives on relationship between invention and innovation. It involves a comparison on “Death Valley” and “Darvin Sea” metaphors which are related with Schumpeter’s and Roberts’ thoughts on invention and innovation. Seventy five researchers from social and applied science participated to the research. As a qualitative study, it utilized cognitive and explorative features, richness and flexibility of metaphors as a research tool. According to the results, both social and applied science researchers have same mind on relationship between invention and innovation but they differ on attributed meaning on invention, innovation and their relations.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bilimin ve işletmeciliğin kesişim noktası olan yenilik kavramını merkezine alan bu çalışma, yenilik ve icat kavramlarına dair bakış açılarının nasıl olduğu, sorunsalı üzerine inşa edilmiştir. Schumpeter ve Roberts’ın icat ve yeniliğe dair düşünceleriyle ilişkilendirilebilen “Ölüm Vadisi” ve “Darvin Denizi” metaforlarıyla karşılaştırma yapılan çalışmada 75 uygulamalı ve sosyal bilim araştırmacısı katılımcı olarak yer almıştır. Nitel yapıda kurgulanan bu araştırmada metaforların bilişsel ve keşfedici olma yönleriyle zengin bakış açıları geliştirme ve esneklik sağlama gibi özelliklerinden yararlanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre her iki katılımcı grup yenilik ve icat arasındaki ilişkiyi benzer şekilde ele alırken, hem bu ilişkiye hem de kavramların kendisine yükledikleri anlamlar konusunda farklılaşmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-yenilik-innovation-icat-invention-kavramlari-arasindaki-iliski-metaforlarla-kesfedici-bir-arastirma.pdf
  • 2
143
164
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahuja, G.& Katila, R. (2004). Where do resources come from? the role of
idiosyncratic situations, Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 887-907.
Altunışık, Remzi, Recai Coşkun, Serkan Bayraktaroğlu ve Engin Yıldırım, (2005),
Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: SPSS Uygulamalı. 4. bs.
Sakarya.
Alves, J., Marques, M.J., Saur, I. & Marques,P. (2007). Creativity and innovation
through multidisciplinary and multisectoral cooperation, Creativity and
Innovation Management, 16 (1), 27-34.
Bell, G. (2005). Research Notes and commentaries, Clusters, Networks and Firm
Innovativeness, Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 287-295.
Branscomb, L. M. & Auerswald, P.E. (2002),
http://www.atp.nist.gov/eao/gcr02-841/contents.htm
Callahan, R.H. (2006). http://ideaflow.corante.com/archives/2006/10/
Casper, S. & Waarden, F. (2005). Innovations and institutions, Edward Elgar
Publishing, USA.
Christensen, C.M. (1997). The innovators dilemma: when new technologies cause
great firms to fail, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chen, Peter and S.M. Hilton (1999), Realtime Interviewing Using The World Wide
Web, Sociological Research Online, 4(3),

Cho, H. & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth,
profitability and market value, Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555-
575.
Yenilik (Inovation) ve İcat (Invention) Kavramları Arasındaki İlişki: Metaforlarla…
162 Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2015, Yıl:3, Cilt:3, Sayı:2
Cohen, A. (2006). Follow the other hand: a remarkable fable that will energize
your business, profits, and life, St. Martin's Press; First Edition edition.
Cooke, P., Roper, S. & Wylie, P. (2001).
www.innovation.lv/ino2/publications/url4.pdf
Cowan, R. & Jonard, N. (2000. The dynamics of collective invention, Journal of
Economic Behavior and Organization, 52, 513-532.
Damanpour F. (1988). Innovation type, radicalness, and the adoption process,
Communication Res. 15(5), 545-567.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational ınnovation: a meta- analysis of effects of
determinants and moderators, The Academy of Management Journal,
34(3), 555-590.
Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and ınnovation: developing and
testing multiple contingency models, Management Science, 42(5), 693-
716.
Dasgupta, P., Gilbert, R.J. & Stiglitz, J.E. (1982). ınvention and ınnovation under
alternative market structures: the case of natural resources, The Review of
Economic Studies, 29(4), 567-582.
Devarajan, T.P., Ramachandran, K. & Ramnarayan, S. (2003). Entrepreneurial
leadership and thriving ınnovation activity, 7th International Conference on
Global Business & Economic Development, Bangkok, 8-11 January.
Erdem, F. & Sarvan, F. (2001). Akademik örgütlerde rehberlik ilişkilerinin
metaforlarla analizi, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Ekim 1/1.
Evan, W.M. & Black, G. (1967). Innovation in business organizations: some
factors associated with success or failure of staff proposals, The Journal of
Business, 40(4), 519-530.
Fiol, C. M. (1996). Squeezing harder doesn’t always work: continuing the search
for consistency in innovation research, Academy of Management Review,
21(4), 1012-1021.
Göker, A. (2001). http://www.focusinnovation.net/what.html
Holstı, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities,
Menlo Park, Addison-Wesley, CA.
Hornby P. & Symon, G. (1994). Tracer studies, in Cassell, C., Symon, G. (Eds),
Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research: A Practical Guide, Sage.
Janssen, O., Veliert, E.V. & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of
ındividual and group ınnovation: a special ıssue ıntroduction, Journal of
Organizational Behaviour, 25(2), 129-145.
Johannessen, J., Olsen, B. & Lumpkin, G.T. (2001). Innovation as newness: what
is new, how new and new to whom?, European Journal of Innovation
Management, 4(1), 20-31.
Lakoff , G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
S. A. DANIŞMAN
163 Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2015, Yıl:3, Cilt:3, Sayı:2
Luborsky, M. (1994). Qualitative research in ageing research, Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Khan, A. M. & Manopichetwattana, V. (1989). Innovative and noninnovative small
firms: type and characteristics, Management Science, 35(5), 597-606.
Kortelainen, Sami (2005), Innovating at the interface: a comparative case study of
innovation process dynamics and outcomes in the public-private context,
http://hsepubl.lib.hse.fi/FI/diss/?cmd=show&dissid=290.
Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2001). Metaphors as a way to explore qualitative data,
Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(3), 367–379
Maclaurin, W. R. (1953). The sequence from ınvention to ınnovation and ıts
relation to economic growth, The Quartery Journal of Economic, 67(1), 97-
111.
McAdam, R. (2000). Knowledge management as a catalyst for ınnovation within
organizations: a qualitative study, Knowledge and Process Management,
7(4), 233-241.
Morgan, Stephanie and Gillian Symon (2006), Eletronic Interviews in
Organizational Research, in Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in
Organizational Research edited by Catherine Cassell and Gillian Symon,
Sage Publication.
Moultrie J., Nilsson M., Haner M.D., Janssen, S. & Lugt, R.V. (2007). Innovation
spaces: towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical
environment in ınnovation, Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1),
53-65.
Osborne, S. P. (1996). The hitch-hiker’s guide to innovation? managing
innovation – and other organizational processes – in an inter-agency
context, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(7), 72–81.
Roberts, E.B. (1988). Managing ınvention and ınnovation, Research technology
Management, 31(1), 11-29.
Sarup, M. (2004). Postyapısalcılık ve postmodernizm, Çev. Abdülbaki Güçlü,
Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları, Ankara.
Schmitt, R. (2000). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative
research, Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394.
SchriftT, A. D. (2002). Dil, metafor ve retorik, derleme ve çeviri, Hüsamettin
Arslan, İnsan Bilimlerine Prolegomena, Paradigma Yayınları, İstanbul.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The theory of economic development, Oxford University
Press, New York.
Utterback, J.M. (1971). The process of technological ınnovation within the firm,
The Academy of Management Journal, 14(1), 75-88.
Van de Van, A.(1986). Central problems in the management of innovations,
Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
Wang, Z. (2005). Organizational effectiveness through technology innovation and
hrm strategies, International Journal of Manpower, 26(6), 481-487.Baltagi,
Yenilik (Inovation) ve İcat (Invention) Kavramları Arasındaki İlişki: Metaforlarla…
164 Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2015, Yıl:3, Cilt:3, Sayı:2
B. H. (2005), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 3rd edition, John
Wiley&Sons Ltd., West Sussex, England.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com