You are here

Home » Content

Tahakküme Hükmetmek: Bourdieu Sosyolojisinde Toplum ve Bilim İlişkisi

Dominating the Domination: Science-Society Relationship in Bourdieu’s Sociology

Journal Name:

  • Sosyoloji Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The distinctive quality of Bourdieusian sociology is the perfection in the explanation of deep and wide scale field studies with a solid weaved and complex conceptual pattern. This article aims to reveal the way he understands the social world, thus how he considers sociology as a science, and its relation with the social world. Bourdieu explains the social world with a conceptual framework centered on “habitus” and locates the domination at the heart of his analysis. He defines sociology with the imperative of denouncing the existent relations of domination in the society and the sociological knowledge as the very condition of understanding these relations of domination by individuals. Thus, which quality of sociological knowledge generates its competence for the production of a genuine intelligence on the society? What is the epistemological characteristic of sociology that the individuals lack, therefore requiring a true understanding of the social world they live within?
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bourdieu sosyolojisinin ayırıcı vasfı, yoğun ve geniş saha araştırmalarının sıkı dokunmuş ve karmaşık bir kavram örüntüsüyle açıklanmasındaki yetkinliktir. Bu makalenin amacı, Bourdieu’nün toplumsal dünyayı anlama tarzını ve bunun üzerinden bir bilim olarak sosyolojiyi ve sosyolojinin toplumsal dünyayla olan ilişkisini nasıl düşündüğünü açığa çıkarmaktır. Bourdieu, toplumsal dünyayı, merkezinde “habitus”un olduğu bir kavramsal çerçeveyle açıklar ve analizinin merkezine tahakkümü koyar. Diğer yandan sosyolojiyi toplumda yürürlükte olan tahakküm ilişkilerini ifşa etme buyruğuyla tanımlar ve bireylerin içlerinde bulundukları bu ilişkileri doğru tanıyabilmeleri için şart sayar. O halde sosyolojinin topluma dair sahici bilgi üretme iddiası hangi vasfından ileri gelmektedir? Bireyleri, sosyolojiyi toplumun geri kalanından ayıran epistemolojik bilimsellikten mahrum ve sosyolojiye muhtaç bırakan nedir?
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 4.pdf
  • 2
85-101
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Addi, L. (2002). Sociologie et anthropologie chez Pierre Bourdieu. Paris: Découverte
Bimbenet, É. (2006). Sens pratique et pratiques réflexives. Quelques développements
sociologiques de l’ontologie merleau-pontienne. Archives de Philosophie, 69: 57-78
Boltanski, L. (2009). De la critique. Précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Paris:
Gallimard
Bourdieu, P. ve Sayad, A. (1964). Le déracinement, la crise de l’agriculture traditionnelle
en Algérie. Paris: Minuit
Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études
d’ethnologie kabyle, Genève: Droz
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Minuit
Bourdieu, P. (1982). Leçon sur la leçon. Paris: Minuit
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Questions de sociologie. Paris: Minuit
Bourdieu, P. (1986). L’illusion biographique, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales.
62-63: 69-72
Bourdieu, P. (1987). Choses dites. Paris: Minuit
Bourdieu, P. ve Wacquant, L. (1992). Réponses. Pour une anthropologie réflexive.
Paris: Seuil
Bourdieu, P. (1993). La misère du monde. Paris: Seuil
Bourdieu, P. (1997a). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Seuil
Bourdieu, P. (1997b). Le champ économique, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences
Sociales, 119: 48-66
Bourdieu, P. (1997c). Les usages sociaux de la science: Pour une sociologie clinique du
champ scientifique, Paris: INRA
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d’agir
Bourdieu, P. (2003). L’objectivation participante, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences
Sociales, 150: 43-57
Corcuff, P. (2003). Bourdieu autrement: Fragilités d’un sociologue de combat. Paris:
Textuel
De Singly, F. (2004). La sociologie, forme particulière de conscience. Bernard Lahire
(Ed.). À quoi sert la sociologie? içinde (s. 13-42). Paris: Découverte
Golsorkhi, D. ve Huault, I. (2006). Pierre Bourdieu: critique et réflexivité comme
attitude analytique, Revue Française de Gestion, 165: 15-34
Hegel (1995), Phénoménologie de l’esprit. Jean-Pierre Lefebvre ve Veronika von
Schenk (Çev.). Paris: Aubier.
Heilbron, J. (2009). Pierre Bourdieu and the peculiarities of sociological knowledge,
(Yayımlanmamış Seminer Tebliği, 9 Mart). http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nylon/
Koytak / Tahakküme Hükmetmek 101
workshops_spring_2009.html
Karadağ, M. (2011). Reflexivity and common sense knowledge: The paradoxes of
Bourdieu’s sociology of practice, Eurasian Journal of Anthropology, 2 (1): 40-47
Kaufmann, J.-C. (2001). Ego. Pour une sociologie de l’individu. Paris: Nathan
Lahire, B. (1998). L’homme pluriel. Les ressorts de l’action. Paris: Nathan
Mesny, A. (2009). What do “we” know that “they” don’t? Sociologists versus nonsociologists
knowledge, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 34 (3): 671-695

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com